Holy Schmokies

@abdlkbrr Ummm no. Hands and Arms are not considered for Offside calls. The fan commentary without knowing anything about the rules and claiming FIFA conspiracy against Iran is just lame. Great play, but execution was clearly offside.

Il y’avait pas hors jeu le bras du joueur belge couvre complètement le joueur iranien concerné par l’action de but.Celui étant en bas ne faisant pas action de jeu n’est pas concerné par le hors jeu ,donc faire une coupe du monde avec une var qui est politique pro usa. NUL

@ScoringChanges @whitesox @tigers Fielders Choice to home plate with runner safe returning to 3rd. So batter doesn't record a hit.

🚨ODD SCORING ALERT🚨 This is from today's @whitesox at @tigers game. Here, with no outs in a tie game and runners on first and third, a ball is hit to first baseman Jacob Gonzalez, who instead of tagging first, threw home, but the runner on third wasn't advancing. This was correctly scored a fielder's choice, and not an error. Part of the Rule 9.12(a)(1) comment says this: "The Official Scorer shall not charge an error to a fielder who incorrectly throws to the wrong base on a play." Because of this rule, it isn't an error, but it also isn't a hit, as Gonzalez had a force out but chose to go elsewhere for an out. #WhiteSox #RepDetroit

@ViralMindLive Sorry but no.

Iran's goal is correct. When politics interferes with football, it corrupts it. The FIFA president is complicit and biased towards everyone except Iran, and this will create a disastrous situation for football. This president will destroy football, the most popular sport in the world, the number one sport globally. He will corrupt it. We must remove the corrupt FIFA president. After removing the corrupt Blatter, we must remove the corrupt one, because, frankly, football has become entangled with politics, and America controls FIFA. America thinks it will control the world, but Iran is a major concern. This means America will feel more confident in manipulating the World Cup. People trusted them and gave them the right to host the World Cup, but with this president, this foolish clown, he will destroy everything and corrupt the best sport in the world. All of this is because of FIFA's machinations.

@AlexvandeKamp2 Any part of the body except hands/arms.

#BELIRN Buitenspel? Ik vind dit raar. De aanvaller in het wit wordt hier buitenspel gegeven. Omdat hij iets achterover buigt? De stand van de voeten zouden toch bepalend moeten zijn? Eens? Zo niet, waarom niet?

@NebbioloNerd @FergieTime93 @The25thNigga Here's video too

@QueuballMark @FergieTime93 @The25thNigga Yup. Risky AF but he’s clearly playing the ball not the man.

If this wasn’t a penalty idk what is then…

@JRRandall @PolymarketSport Clear as day ball contact first on slide tackle.

@QueuballMark @PolymarketSport I want to see the video not a bunch of still frames but yes that one

🚨TRENDING: The ref blew the final whistle while Cabo Verde had a free kick in a very dangerous position… robbing them of a potential winner

@JRRandall @PolymarketSport The still frames show the ball contact first. Body context doesn't make a foul by itself unless it's a dangerous play or in absence of ball contact first.

@NaijaBet @PolymarketSport Ref was right. The corner kick is part of play and if not done before extra time ends there isn't more time added to complete it.

@PolymarketSport Absolute scenes! You can't help but feel for Cabo Verde there—that is pure heartbreak at the final whistle. The drama in these late stages is why we love the game, even when it leaves everyone stunned. Did the referee get this one completely wrong, or was the time...

@G9zer9 @PolymarketSport No need ref had clear view. Would have been upheld anyway.

@PolymarketSport Something was up. No replays either on controversial decisions.

@PolymarketSport Corner, not Free. The clock is continuous and the corner is part of play so there isn't more time allotted for the kick after extra time ends.

@JRRandall @PolymarketSport You mean the clear no foul?

@PolymarketSport Also that slide tackle from behind in the box should have went to VAR

@YahooSports No

Should this have been called a penalty for Cape Verde in stoppage time vs. Uruguay? 🤔

@R3duX100 @Sau7even @PandadelAmorXXI Clearly the idiots on the ground dropped him, couldn't hold him.

@QueuballMark @Sau7even @PandadelAmorXXI Was in a different location. Yes, was in Paseo de la Reforma, but the 1st jump from a news-stand, the 2nd jumped from a Metrobus station. Anyway, the first one was an idiot. He would still have jumped like a wrestler, he would have used his hands and he wouldn't have fucked up.

Reportan que quedó cuadrapléjico el briago pendejo que se aventó durante los festejos de la victoria ante Corea. #PandaNews

@PandadelAmorXXI They dropped him! Where is news source on his condition?

@PandadelAmorXXI @grok is this story true

@Sau7even @PandadelAmorXXI That's because he went second and saw the first guy

@PandadelAmorXXI Este morro fue más listo

@ScoringChanges @Phillies @Mets He's more than 1/3 between 2nd-3rd at time of cutoff throw, so he was definitely going to 3rd. You could argue consideration of the cycle doesn't matter and he would've stayed at second if no runners were on base. But that's subjective and within the umpire discretion.

🚨CYCLE SCORING ALERT🚨 Tons of folks sent this one in from the @Phillies and @Mets game, with Bryce Harper completing the cycle with this fifth inning triple. I believe this was scored correctly as a triple. This falls under Rule 9.06; Determining the Value of Base Hits. The key is Harper never slowed down at all and was going for third the whole time. One of the things the scorer has to determine is whether or not Harper went to third on the throw or not. He obviously was going for third regardless, and the fact that he would have been out is inconsequential here. The OS Manual states this: “Had the bases been empty, would the batter-runner have attempted to advance the extra base? If not, the value of the base hit should not include the additional base.” The answer on this one is yes, Harper would have ATTEMPTED to advance. Doesn’t say if he would have been safe. Since he would have attempted this regardless of the throw home, he was, IMHO, correctly credited with a triple.

@AK_Slips Ball contact.

@skydlimit21 @The25thNigga All ball by defenders.

@The25thNigga LMAO. This isnt a Penalty. The guy got a clean challenge on the ball…the body contact doesnt determine if its a penalty or not as long ass it was clean ball at first

@FergieTime93 @The25thNigga Neither was a penalty because defenders got ball.

@The25thNigga This first tackle was outside the 18 yards but damn the second one was a clear penalty Argentina have been awarded penalty for less