@BrownieBot96248@BasedIllinoisan Yeah screwing yourself over long term in exchange for 2 years of stuff you want sounds great. Yall are already gonna lose a ton of house seats and EVs after the 2030 census. You think someone like Newsom will soften that blow even a little? Really?
@ReallGray@BasedIllinoisan What is the point of elections? Why do you want your party to win? Have you never thought about that? I would rather 2 years of a sweeping agenda than 4-6 years of status quo bullshit. I dont think they would lose so many seats if they accomplish a vast agenda and communicate it
A Jewish man was the runner-up for the Democratic nomination twice in the last decade and his base was virtually all of the same people that Zionists on both sides of the aisle falsely accuse of antisemitism.
@BrownieBot96248@BasedIllinoisan If you think any of the other candidates i mentioned are gonna get you very far... 2030 would not go well I don't imagine. Or 2032.
@ReallGray@BasedIllinoisan Because maybe I want actual good policy to get through Congress and not a president that will just cause us to get someone even more anti-establishment than Trump 4 or 8 years later.
@BasedIllinoisan If its harris/newsom/buttigieg/AOC, you'd be surprised how badly they'll mess it up. Shapiro is about to win reelection by possibly 20 in PA. Why risk it with candidates that are borderline unelectable on the national level?
@ReallGray@djmarkfarina im saying man you're right bro probably didn't know but he sourced it like he had it down. thats lame. he also hasnt changed it. shit piss me off irrationally
@ReallGray@djmarkfarina if i cant find any source linking anything to a sports illustrated 2004 issue with these 3 across the entire internet then it doesnt exist. its spreading disinformation for the fun of it. now im pissed this doesnt exist and am more pissed that this genAIshit is only getting worse