ℝeallyℝadley

104.5K posts

ℝeallyℝadley banner
ℝeallyℝadley

ℝeallyℝadley

@ReallyRadley

~Right-libertarian, but I like to tweet about sci-fi, fantasy, wordplay, language, and tech. I don't hide my beliefs, but I'm open-minded.

Beigetreten Mart 2017
6.5K Folgt3.1K Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
Ages come and pass, leaving memories that become legends. Legend fades to myth, and even myth is long forgotten… Thank you, friends.
English
5
1
68
10.1K
ℝeallyℝadley retweetet
Kendric Tonn
Kendric Tonn@kendrictonn·
As always, I am available for commission, the work I post is generally available until it's not, and hey, you can always whack that subscribe button for a lil bit of low-friction art patronage o7
PoIiMath@politicalmath

I'm very much with @GPrime85 on this. If you have too much money, FIND SOME ART YOU LIKE AND FUND IT James Joyce was able to write like he did b/c he had a patron and we are culturally richer because of it Pay for art, you philistines!

English
0
2
32
814
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
I was watching an ep of Justice League Unlimited and saw Wonder Woman transform by spinning like Lynda Carter used to. Is that a canonical power? @CoughsOnWombats
English
0
0
1
79
madeofmistake
madeofmistake@madeofmistak3·
superman but he only has enough power for about 10 minutes a day
English
3
0
6
100
ℝeallyℝadley retweetet
FIRE
FIRE@TheFIREorg·
UCLA Law has threatened its @FedSoc chapter with punishment if it publicly identifies students seen on video disrupting last week’s viral campus event with a Department of Homeland Security lawyer. But when protesters named chapter members online? No signs of concern from @UCLA_law. This double standard is striking and sounds First Amendment alarms. The First Amendment protects students’ right to share truthful information about a public event, including the names of students who disrupted it, especially where attendees were informed in advance that the event would be recorded. UCLA must make clear that no Fed Soc student member will face discipline for protected speech. Stop picking favorites, UCLA. Correct this immediately.
FIRE tweet mediaFIRE tweet mediaFIRE tweet mediaFIRE tweet media
English
68
648
2.6K
248.4K
That COMICBOOK Guy
That COMICBOOK Guy@Culture3ase·
Which animated TV show is better? Invincible Batman
That COMICBOOK Guy tweet mediaThat COMICBOOK Guy tweet media
English
719
86
1.3K
286.9K
ℝeallyℝadley retweetet
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
I agree with the majority that, either way, you were assigning people based on race and that that is both unconstitutional and wrong.
English
0
0
1
34
ℝeallyℝadley
ℝeallyℝadley@ReallyRadley·
What's interesting to me about racial gerrymandering is that there were two ways to violate it: - If you split protected minority voters too broadly, you were "cracking" to reduce their influence. - If you put too many in a district, you were "packing" to reduce their influence.
Sean Davis@seanmdav

BREAKING: In a 6-3 decision, the Supreme Court rules that racial gerrymandering, which has been used to create majority black congressional districts for decades, is unconstitutional. Justice Samuel Alito wrote the opinion for the majority.

English
1
0
9
203