Restore Britain - St Helens Branch

@GlennRestore891 He's so bold 😂 I love that about him!

@RestoreStH I love how he just dropped it in the car. Rupert - "I'll swap you for one". Woman in the car - "I'm alright thanks". Rupert - "don't care, here's a leaflet anyway". 😂😂

Finally, a leader with a sense of humour! For me, it's not just that Rupert exemplifies the values that have long made our country great; it's that he comes across as genuine. He speaks his mind, has the courage of his convictions, and knows how to make people laugh. These are rare qualities in a modern-day politician.

When I was 9 or 10 I was sent to the corner shop with my cousins for eggs and rolls. Our mums told us to keep the change and get a sweet. Shop owner short changed us considerably. We protested. He got violent, manhandled us out of the shop. We shouted “rip off” and “thief”, then left. He knocked on my auntie’s door the next day. Said I called him a “paki bastard” and that he was hurt and offended by this. She told my mum. I absolutely categorically did not say this and told my mum that I didn’t. “The man said you did” This was the start of the summer holidays, I was grounded for the entire holiday, not allowed to leave the house. He lied. I’ve never forgotten. He was a Pakistani Muslim, which I knew because I knew his son and daughter. I could never ever understand why he lied. Still don’t. I was punished for being “racist” when I didn’t even know the meaning of racism at that age. False accusations of racism are worse than racism in my opinion. In my case, I had to spend the summer indoors, In Henry Nowak’s case, he died a brutal, preventable death.

@J_A_Fernie I'm curious, what are the ingredients in the spray? Where can it be purchased?

If anybody is able to and wants to help, this is the wish list for the UTC kits that have been getting handed out to women There’s drink covers, legal pepper spray and rape alarms Thanks for the support in keeping the women and girls of Scotland safe amazon.co.uk/hz/wishlist/ls…

@DRestoreGlasgow Extremely 😄 I want to reply to people, but I'm being blocked repeatedly

@RestoreStH It’s annoying when that happens.

X’s algorithm thinks I’m a bot, so my ability to interact in any way is currently limited. Hopefully this passes soon, and I’ll be able to engage without such heavy restrictions. Thank you all for your support in the meantime. Wishing everyone a peaceful night 🌙

@Restoreplym_off It keeps blocking me from liking and commenting on posts 🥲

@RestoreStH They won't think that if we're talking with you.

@MichaelNix7314 @thejenntruckerr Thank you 🙏🏼

@RestoreStH @thejenntruckerr Already reported and blocked.

🚨 Warning 🚨 Do not click any links sent to you from this account: @thejenntruckerr Whoever is behind it is an impersonator who appears, based on their app store location, to be located in Africa and is attempting to steal people's login credentials. Please share and report the account!

@Anon7127 @Stoic_patriot25 Followed 😊

@Stoic_patriot25 is on 667,needs a follow please guys🫡🇬🇧

Okay, here's the thing, Zara. I'm going to talk to you as a rational human being here, which is more than you deserve, given that you're a champion of Islam and the way it treats your fellow women (not to mention ours, but more on that later). Nonetheless, I will do you the courtesy of addressing you with some respect. 10 years ago, I was as liberal as they came. I had absolutely no issues with Islam, or Muslims. Hell, I even defended Muslims to real bigots and racists. I was in favour of multiculturalism and thought it enriched us rather than destroyed us. Then, I started seeing men (just men) wearing life jackets in dinghies arriving at our shores. At first, I thought they were fleeing some terrible atrocity. How wrong I was. Then, I saw Islam slowly taking over our towns and cities. Bradford. Birmingham. Rotherham. Manchester. Crowds of Muslim men on the pavement, slowly claiming each area as their own, telling white people to leave their territory. Then, I heard and read stories about women and young girls getting harassed, attacked and r*ped while walking the streets by men who spoke very little English and had a middle-Eastern appearance... Then I started reading and hearing about the Asian grooming gangs, and how our women and kids were tortured, raped and, in some cases, killed so that some of your more perverted and depraved men could get their sexual kicks. And then today, with the release of this report, came a final realisation - almost an epiphany: Islam is not compatible with British values, customs or culture. In no way, shape or form. I am not a right-winger. I'm not a racist, Islamophobe or whatever name you want to call me. I'm just a bloke who remembers how it was, and wants to to be that way again. I'm just a bloke who loves his country and his history. I'm just a bloke who wants the future to be a bright one for the British people. I'm also a bloke who you would gladly see thrown from the top of a building for something you find an abomination. The true abomination is how your men have treated the most vulnerable in our society - our kids and our women. I'm also a bloke who loves dogs. They're the most lovable, faithful and beautiful creatures on God's earth, but you consider them unclean. That's the difference between you and us. It's nothing to do with the colour of your skin. It's nothing to do with where you came from. It's to do with the fact that you don't belong here. Multiculturalism was a massive failure. The experiment was cataclysmically flawed. You won't integrate. You won't respect us, our culture, our past or our heritage. You just want to turn us into another Islamic country. Not gonna happen. And you, in particular, do everything you can to bait us, then play the victim when you receive pushback. I see you. 👀 You have 57 other choices, Zara. Pick one. Be happy. Leave us alone. Do all of that, and I will truly wish you well. I don't care how offended you get. I love my country, and I will never apologise for it. 🇬🇧 As you were.

@WaitWot18903 Show me where I said ancestry and genetics are superficial.

@RestoreStH Yeah, skin colour is superficial, but ancestry and genetics are not, and whoever told you that "race" was skin colour was lying, and you fell for an obvious lie, because since when were Albino Africans White? Divergent hereditary traits are the reason why cultures are so distinct

Why have I decided to become a branch organiser? It’s simple: each day, our country deteriorates. This isn’t about superficial traits like skin colour -- it’s about culture. Shared values. Personal safety. Common decency. We can bring it back, together. #VoteRestore 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

@FireNeslo Especially when the government does it.

@RestoreStH I wish we would all agree cyberstalking is creepy. Even when the government does it.

This is deeply concerning. Age verification is not the solution, and our government should not be stepping in to parent young people in place of those who brought them into the world. Government intervention should always be minimal. #VoteRestore 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

Patriots as far as the eye can see! Our goal is clear: to support Rupert in forming a government in 2029. He is the only leader who will deliver the change we want to see 🏴󠁧󠁢󠁥󠁮󠁧󠁿🇬🇧

It's not worth the cookies, and I certainly won't be creating a free account to read this drivel. @Telegraph, we're all terribly bored -- do try to surprise us once in a while 🥱

@alanmckay969 I'm not saying all people are the same.

@RestoreStH If all people are equal, the same, then all countries and cultures would be the same, but they're not, because even though there are physical differences between races, for some reason it is racist to notice that there are also mental differences between the races.

I'd like to take a moment to revisit the last post I wrote in response to this comment -- which I've since deleted due to how it had been interpreted. First of all, I stand by my words. Skin colour is, objectively, a superficial characteristic. We are not merely bags of blood, tissue, and organs encapsulated by white skin. We are far more complex than that. While I'm willing to acknowledge that our outward appearance can indicate shared ancestry and cultural heritage, it is not a determinant of values, character, or an individual's worth. I did not intend to diminish the importance of our origins, but to emphasise that our identity cannot be reduced to appearance alone. I love my people. I love our country. I am not here to upset anyone.

Whilst out knocking on doors today in Makerfield, Restore Britain volunteers came across a lifeless baby hedgehog on a doorstep. After some water and lots of cuddles, they then found some locals who happened to rescue hedgehogs! I can report that Rupert the hedgehog has now been adopted and is on the road to a full recovery! Great work, patriots! 🦔

We are going to surprise a good few people later tonight.

I think you're conflating two separate points. My claim was that skin colour is a superficial characteristic in the literal sense that it is part of our outward appearance. I did not say that ancestry, heritage, biology, or race are superficial. Acknowledging that biological differences exist between races does not contradict that point. Skin colour is an outward, visible trait while race, ancestry, and heritage encompass much more than appearance alone. The argument I've been making from the outset is that skin colour does not fully define an individual. A person is more than their appearance, and more than any single aspect of their identity.

You've just acknowledged biological differences between races, then say "superficial" means surface-level. So which is it? Biological differences would be encoded in every cell, not just skin cells or "surface-level". I don't wish to speak on your behalf, but would you mean something more akin to "race is not a defining feature of an individual". That can portray a general message without being easily misunderstood in good faith, or worse, misrepresented in bad faith.

@Menace2Suburbia Someone who gets it 😌

I agree with this. Race isn’t as important as culture. And arguing the case for Restore Britain from a race-based angle is not the best strategy imo. Please let me explain my angle. We should concentrate on culture and deliberately, pedantically, separate it from race. Why? Because race-based arguments come with a stigma and no amount of shouting “I don’t care,” will get undecideds and small-c conservatives to vote for us, because they still DO care about stigma. However, I believe it is still widely accepted, and we can objectively say, that Anglosphere culture is better than those of the third world in many ways. We should not be ashamed to say that. Historically, it’s why most of the immigrants wanted to come here. They came here because our culture believed in fair play, openness and tolerance, which in turn fostered the opportunity they sought here. The difference to now, is that in past times we controlled immigration much tighter, so immigrants had time to assimilate into our culture. They could say they were British, because to all intents and purposes, they acted British - they abided by our rules, our practices and had a sense of ambition to make their sacrifices coming here mean something. Their children grew up steeped in British culture, taught by their parents to respect and admire the opportunity it had given them. Now we have a large swathe of immigrants who have no intent to be British. They don’t even have an idea of what that is, or worse, actively hate what we are and teach their children to hate us going forward. They are not tolerant. They do not believe in fair play. They demand our capitulation to their way of life. They find ways to cheat the system. They want to pilfer on the generosity of the taxpayer. They don’t integrate - they form ghettoised communities and slowly change Britain into wherever they came from. Their children see the outside Britain as alien to their culture at home. It’s parasitic. And it’s driving our culture down with it. Less tolerant, less law abiding, less fair. Immigrants who came here for good honest reasons can even see it, to the point where now the skilled ones we need are leaving. It’s not the Britain they knew and came here for. We need to restore Britain back to the point where whoever wants to come here, regardless of race, wants to come to be British, respects our values and wants to give something back. The short term tonic will be painful. Extreme, potentially. The milk from teat must be soured so much that the ‘parasitic’ type of immigrant voluntarily want to leave. It is Restore’s policy to still allow immigrants who are willing to contribute and add high value to this country. Restore even want to make it easier for foreign spouses of Brits to come here easier. Their polices are not racist. This must be stressed. But this is the part I say to those of an ethnat bent within Restore: Given that most of the rest of the world is majority non-white and unfortunately poorer than the U.K., many of those being made to feel unwelcome here by the closure of benefits and increased scrutiny, will naturally not be white. Their leaving, therefore, increases the proportion of white Britons. It eases the burden on the housing system and the health service. As the feckless ones leave, so too do some of the instances of crime to which they are disproportionately represented; it will increase the sense of community cohesion and trust and ease some of the burden on the police and justice system. It will take a generation, but in this new country will we see Britons more willing and able to start families of their own. You can make the argument for white British repopulation without having to broach it directly, simply from arguing a position of culture. The race argument gets us nowhere. Argue from a cultural perspective, and you get what you want without the stigma, while gaining more support from the undecided. My tuppence.

I think we're using the word 'superficial' differently. When I describe skin colour as a superficial characteristic, I'm not saying it's unimportant, imaginary, or devoid of meaning. I'm simply saying that it's part of our outward appearance rather than the sum total of who we are. I'm happy to acknowledge that ancestry, heritage, and even certain biological differences exist between races. My point is that these things do not fully define a person. Character, values, conduct, culture, and lived experience all matter too. The disagreement seems to be that some people interpreted 'superficial' as irrelevant, whereas I was using it to mean surface-level.