Retard Bag Finder
1.2K posts

Retard Bag Finder
@RetardBagFinder
@ifindretards but for finance bagholders 🏴☠️.

🚨BREAKING🚨 DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE AND DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND SECURITY ISSUE INTERIM FINAL RULE FOR THE SAFER SKIES ACT This is an Interim Final Rule (IFR) titled “Counter-UAS Authority for State, Local, Tribal, and Territorial Law Enforcement and Correctional Agencies,” issued jointly by the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) and Department of Justice (DOJ). It was placed on public inspection on July 1, 2026, is scheduled for Federal Register publication on July 6, 2026, and became effective July 1, 2026. It implements the SAFER SKIES Act (Pub. L. No. 119-60, enacted December 2025 as part of the FY2026 NDAA), which amended 6 U.S.C. § 124n to extend counter-unmanned aircraft system (C-UAS) authority beyond federal agencies to qualified state, local, tribal, and territorial (SLTT) law enforcement and correctional agencies. Key Provisions The rule creates a structured, regulated framework so SLTT agencies can independently (without needing federal deputization or on-scene federal personnel) perform C-UAS operations against UAS posing a credible threat to: -People, facilities, or assets -Large-scale public events/venues -Critical infrastructure -Correctional facilities Authorized actions include detection, identification, monitoring, tracking, warning operators, confiscation, disruption, disabling, seizing control, or (in extreme cases) destroying the UAS. It provides a statutory “notwithstanding” clause that overrides certain federal criminal laws (e.g., aircraft piracy, computer fraud, wiretap statutes) and conflicting state/local laws when operations follow the rule’s requirements. Two-tier certification system (via the FBI’s National Counter-UAS Training Center — NCUTC): -Detection and Warning Certification — Online training; covers passive/active detection, tracking, warning, and confiscation. -Mitigation Certification — More rigorous (includes resident training); required for active disruption, disabling, or destruction. Agencies must adopt an implementation policy (reviewed by legal counsel), submit a C-UAS Operations Plan, and use only authorized technologies. Authorized Technologies framework: Jointly maintained Authorized Technologies List (categories, e.g., RF detection, jamming, protocol manipulation) and Authorized Systems List (specific vetted systems). RF-emitting systems require FCC authorization; FAA coordination for airspace/safety. Non-emitting systems (e.g., certain radars/cameras) have lighter requirements. Coordination and oversight: Advance notification/coordination via a federal C-UAS portal (FBI/DHS, FAA, FCC). Real-time FAA notification for mitigation actions. Strict privacy protections (data minimization, retention limits on intercepted communications, dissemination restrictions). 48-hour post-mitigation reporting + semiannual summaries. Audits, civil penalties up to $100,000 per violation, and suspension authority for non-compliance. The authority sunsets on December 31, 2031, unless extended. The rule was issued as an IFR (with request for comments) under good-cause exceptions due to urgent UAS threats and major upcoming events. Why This Is Bullish for Counter-UAS Companies This rule is one of the most significant positive developments for the U.S. C-UAS industry in years because it dramatically expands the addressable market and creates a clear, scalable pathway for commercial technology adoption. Massive expansion of the buyer base Previously, broad C-UAS mitigation authority was largely limited to federal agencies (DHS, DOJ, DoD, etc.). SLTT agencies could only participate via federal task force deputization. The rule now enables thousands of state/local police departments, sheriffs’ offices, and correctional facilities to operate independently after training and policy adoption. With ~18,000 law enforcement agencies and thousands of prisons/correctional facilities in the U.S., even modest adoption rates represent a huge increase in potential customers. Federal grant funding to drive procurement There is already a dedicated FEMA Counter-UAS Grant Program providing hundreds of millions of dollars (references to $250M + rapid awards and up to $500M total) specifically to enhance SLTT detection, tracking, and mitigation capabilities. This rule makes those funds much more usable by giving agencies the legal and procedural framework to actually buy and deploy systems. Authorized Technologies Lists create a “seal of approval” effect Getting systems on the joint Authorized Technologies List / Authorized Systems List will become a major competitive advantage and de facto requirement for sales to SLTT agencies. This standardizes procurement and reduces buyer hesitation. Companies with systems already aligned with federal requirements (or that can quickly get evaluated) are well positioned. Removes legal and operational friction for end users The biggest historical barrier was legal risk (potential criminal liability under federal statutes for jamming, intercepting signals, etc.). This rule provides a clear “safe harbor” for compliant operations, making agencies far more willing to procure and use C-UAS technology. It also explicitly preserves the private sector’s role in design, sale, and maintenance of systems. Complements other policy tailwinds This pairs with the FAA’s recent proposed rule on Unmanned Aircraft Flight Restrictions (UAFRs) over critical infrastructure and other efforts to address rising drone threats (prisons, stadiums, events, infrastructure). Demand drivers are strong and accelerating. Bottom line: The rule turns a statutory expansion (SAFER SKIES Act) into an operational reality. It shifts C-UAS from a mostly federal niche capability to a broadly deployable tool for thousands of SLTT agencies, backed by dedicated federal funding and a standardized approval process. For companies with credible detection and/or mitigation technologies that can navigate the authorized lists and certification ecosystem, this is a clear, near-term catalyst for larger addressable market, faster sales cycles, and accelerated adoption. The rule is still open for public comment (60 days after Federal Register publication), so final details on lists, training logistics, etc., could evolve slightly, but the core framework and market-opening effect are now in place. Source: public-inspection.federalregister.gov/2026-13609.pdf

Pride month is over, you guys can stop being faggots now
































