Manoj Rawat🇮🇳

31.5K posts

Manoj Rawat🇮🇳 banner
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳

Manoj Rawat🇮🇳

@SeaSkipper

Veteran Naval Captain. Master Mariner. Naval Warfare. Maritime Security. Defence. Geopolitics.

India Beigetreten Kasım 2014
2.5K Folgt6.2K Follower
Angehefteter Tweet
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳@SeaSkipper·
It is not called 'rocking' but pitching. Secondly it is not 'slapping' but slamming. Thirdly the sea is not calm but there is a perceptible swell. Fourthly Indian Navy has been operating aircraft carriers for 50 years unlike Chinese Navy for 10 years But thanks for ur concern 😉
彩云香江@louischeung_hk

Sea was calm during #INSVikrant 's trial run. But it can be found rocking up and down during sea trials, its bow rising and falling and slapping against the sea. Should be the hull of the center of gravity problems, carrier-based aircraft take off and land will bring problems.

English
110
983
5.4K
0
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳@SeaSkipper·
I am a Naval Veteran and Merchant Navy officer, and this is why I think @RahulGandhi is wrong on Great Nicobar. From an Indian national interest standpoint, Great Nicobar is not a “scam”; it is a strategic port located astride one of the most critical maritime chokepoints on earth, close to the Strait of Malacca, where a huge share of global trade moves every day. India cannot afford to treat Great Nicobar as a sentimental issue when it is a rare natural asset for maritime power, deterrence, and economic security. Yes, Great Nicobar is ecologically sensitive. India respects that. But national strategy is about balancing environmental safeguards with long-term security, logistics, and sovereignty. The current project is designed around an international container transshipment terminal, a dual-use airport, power infrastructure, and a planned township -all of which strengthen Indian Navy’s ability to monitor international sea lanes, improve military response times, and reduce commercial dependence on foreign transshipment hubs. To dismiss this as “destruction dressed in development’s language” is politically convenient, but strategically shallow. This kind of language suits our adversaries rather than us. India’s maritime future cannot be secured by empty slogans. It will be secured by developing ports, airfields, logistics nodes, surveillance, and persistent military presence in the Indo-Pacific. That is exactly why Great Nicobar matters. The real question is not whether development should happen, but how to execute strategic development responsibly while protecting our National interest. We can and should demand strict environmental compliance, tribal safeguards, and transparent implementation not reject a project that strengthens India’s maritime security simply because it is complex and uncomfortable. Great Nicobar is not just an island. It is a test of whether India can step up to its destined role as a great maritime power or remain trapped in slogan politics.
Rahul Gandhi@RahulGandhi

I travelled through Great Nicobar today. These are the most extraordinary forests I have ever seen in my life. Trees older than memory. Forests that took generations to grow. The people on this island are equally beautiful - both the adivasi communities and the settlers - but they are being robbed of what is rightfully theirs. The government calls what it is doing here a “Project.” What I have seen is not a project. It is millions of trees marked for the axe. It is 160 square kilometres of rainforest condemned to die. It is communities that have been ignored while their homes have been snatched away. This is not development. This is destruction dressed in development’s language. So I will say it plainly, and I will keep saying it: what is being done in Great Nicobar is one of the biggest scams and gravest crimes against this country’s natural and tribal heritage in our lifetime. It must be stopped. And it can be stopped - if Indians choose to see what I have seen.

English
353
1.5K
3.6K
111.8K
J P Joshi
J P Joshi@JPJoshi1·
@SeaSkipper @RahulGandhi Thank you - very considered view by you, a naval veteran/merchant navy officer. @RahulGandhi of @incindia has a habit of picking issues with projects that deal with nat'l security, & creating high decibel political noise around it; never understood his motivation & intentions.
English
1
0
2
193
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳@SeaSkipper·
Thank you @prinstaz. You have added some great points. Completely with you on “Reduce direct dependence on Singapore, Colombo, Klang hubs; save ~$220 million annually otherwise paid to foreign ports; shorten Indian Navy + Indian Coast Guard response times; strengthen SLOCs monitoring; integrate civil-military capabilities for deterrence, disaster response, blue economy growth -> all fully aligning with SAGAR, Act East, and India’s overall role as a net security provider.”
English
1
1
6
194
Priyanka
Priyanka@prinstaz·
On point, @SeaSkipper ! Some important points to add: 1. India’s Andaman & Nicobar archipelago shall command over 1,000 kms of Exclusive Economic Zone sitting astride one of the most critical maritime arteries: the approaches to the Strait of Malacca that witnesses ~80% of China’s oil imports alongside ~35-40% of global trade. The nation that gains strategic depth, presence, surveillance, and rapid-response capability at this vital chokepoint, shall command the Indo-Pacific’s future and also serve as befitting deterrence to China’s ‘string of pearls’ dual-use of infra across the IOR. 2. India’s international container transshipment terminal at Galathea Bay, dual-use airport, power infra, and an integrated township shall serve multifold strategic purposes: Reduce direct dependence on Singapore, Colombo, Klang hubs; save ~$220 million annually otherwise paid to foreign ports; shorten Indian Navy + Indian Coast Guard response times; strengthen SLOCs monitoring; integrate civil-military capabilities for deterrence, disaster response, blue economy growth -> all fully aligning with SAGAR, Act East, and India’s overall role as a net security provider. 3. Coming onto the sustainability part: Rahul Gandhi and clan must know that India already demonstrated sustainable development commitments through NGT clearance attained in Feb 2026 that explicitly upheld environmental safeguards whilst recognising these strategic imperatives. For the phased implementation, rigorous Environmental Management Plans, ICRZ compliance, no-go zones for critical biodiversity, tribal welfare frameworks (including Shompen policy), protection for indigenous communities- all been pursued, shall be adhered to, and required compliances fulfilled. 4. India, under PM Modi government, a country that achieved some its SDGs and NDCs 9-11 years in advance of UNFCCC Paris-aligning climate and sustainability agreements despite being disproportionately underfunded by UN-allied sustainability and climate financing global initiatives - stands firmly committed to responsible and sustainable development across all strategic and complex undertakings; the Great Nicobar project shall be treated no differently! Anyone who fails to comprehend this, clearly neither holds domain depth, nor upholds Indian national interests, and certainly lacks strategic thinking. @PMOIndia @DrSJaishankar @rajnathsingh @PiyushGoyal @nsitharaman
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳@SeaSkipper

I am a Naval Veteran and Merchant Navy officer, and this is why I think @RahulGandhi is wrong on Great Nicobar. From an Indian national interest standpoint, Great Nicobar is not a “scam”; it is a strategic port located astride one of the most critical maritime chokepoints on earth, close to the Strait of Malacca, where a huge share of global trade moves every day. India cannot afford to treat Great Nicobar as a sentimental issue when it is a rare natural asset for maritime power, deterrence, and economic security. Yes, Great Nicobar is ecologically sensitive. India respects that. But national strategy is about balancing environmental safeguards with long-term security, logistics, and sovereignty. The current project is designed around an international container transshipment terminal, a dual-use airport, power infrastructure, and a planned township -all of which strengthen Indian Navy’s ability to monitor international sea lanes, improve military response times, and reduce commercial dependence on foreign transshipment hubs. To dismiss this as “destruction dressed in development’s language” is politically convenient, but strategically shallow. This kind of language suits our adversaries rather than us. India’s maritime future cannot be secured by empty slogans. It will be secured by developing ports, airfields, logistics nodes, surveillance, and persistent military presence in the Indo-Pacific. That is exactly why Great Nicobar matters. The real question is not whether development should happen, but how to execute strategic development responsibly while protecting our National interest. We can and should demand strict environmental compliance, tribal safeguards, and transparent implementation not reject a project that strengthens India’s maritime security simply because it is complex and uncomfortable. Great Nicobar is not just an island. It is a test of whether India can step up to its destined role as a great maritime power or remain trapped in slogan politics.

English
7
23
42
3.8K
Kuldip Kaur (मोदी का परिवार)
Well explained Major ji. Can't understand when @RahulGandhi doesn't understand the port's strategic importance in Great Nicobar, why does he put his nose into it only to get exposed.
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳@SeaSkipper

I am a Naval Veteran and Merchant Navy officer, and this is why I think @RahulGandhi is wrong on Great Nicobar. From an Indian national interest standpoint, Great Nicobar is not a “scam”; it is a strategic port located astride one of the most critical maritime chokepoints on earth, close to the Strait of Malacca, where a huge share of global trade moves every day. India cannot afford to treat Great Nicobar as a sentimental issue when it is a rare natural asset for maritime power, deterrence, and economic security. Yes, Great Nicobar is ecologically sensitive. India respects that. But national strategy is about balancing environmental safeguards with long-term security, logistics, and sovereignty. The current project is designed around an international container transshipment terminal, a dual-use airport, power infrastructure, and a planned township -all of which strengthen Indian Navy’s ability to monitor international sea lanes, improve military response times, and reduce commercial dependence on foreign transshipment hubs. To dismiss this as “destruction dressed in development’s language” is politically convenient, but strategically shallow. This kind of language suits our adversaries rather than us. India’s maritime future cannot be secured by empty slogans. It will be secured by developing ports, airfields, logistics nodes, surveillance, and persistent military presence in the Indo-Pacific. That is exactly why Great Nicobar matters. The real question is not whether development should happen, but how to execute strategic development responsibly while protecting our National interest. We can and should demand strict environmental compliance, tribal safeguards, and transparent implementation not reject a project that strengthens India’s maritime security simply because it is complex and uncomfortable. Great Nicobar is not just an island. It is a test of whether India can step up to its destined role as a great maritime power or remain trapped in slogan politics.

English
3
1
5
163
Mahesh Bharti
Mahesh Bharti@mahesh8049·
@SeaSkipper @RahulGandhi Suppose these islands fall prey to the enemy. Will they preserve biodiversity ?? We need safe boundaries for the nation .
English
1
0
2
464
Atman Power
Atman Power@nityatma·
@SeaSkipper @RahulGandhi Sir please watch this as you are a Naval Officer. See how Rajiv Gandhi compromised Indian top secret with Italians and spent millions on his pleasure holidays in Lakshdweep.
English
6
5
15
1.8K
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳 retweetet
Esha_Pune
Esha_Pune@SoillyLands·
Your words matter a lot. To be honest, I didn't read Rahul's tweet But read yours completely twice.
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳@SeaSkipper

I am a Naval Veteran and Merchant Navy officer, and this is why I think @RahulGandhi is wrong on Great Nicobar. From an Indian national interest standpoint, Great Nicobar is not a “scam”; it is a strategic port located astride one of the most critical maritime chokepoints on earth, close to the Strait of Malacca, where a huge share of global trade moves every day. India cannot afford to treat Great Nicobar as a sentimental issue when it is a rare natural asset for maritime power, deterrence, and economic security. Yes, Great Nicobar is ecologically sensitive. India respects that. But national strategy is about balancing environmental safeguards with long-term security, logistics, and sovereignty. The current project is designed around an international container transshipment terminal, a dual-use airport, power infrastructure, and a planned township -all of which strengthen Indian Navy’s ability to monitor international sea lanes, improve military response times, and reduce commercial dependence on foreign transshipment hubs. To dismiss this as “destruction dressed in development’s language” is politically convenient, but strategically shallow. This kind of language suits our adversaries rather than us. India’s maritime future cannot be secured by empty slogans. It will be secured by developing ports, airfields, logistics nodes, surveillance, and persistent military presence in the Indo-Pacific. That is exactly why Great Nicobar matters. The real question is not whether development should happen, but how to execute strategic development responsibly while protecting our National interest. We can and should demand strict environmental compliance, tribal safeguards, and transparent implementation not reject a project that strengthens India’s maritime security simply because it is complex and uncomfortable. Great Nicobar is not just an island. It is a test of whether India can step up to its destined role as a great maritime power or remain trapped in slogan politics.

English
1
1
5
1.1K
Maverickindian18
Maverickindian18@Maverickindi18·
@SeaSkipper @RahulGandhi Thank you for the detailed explanation. But, point is the anti national guy just reads the script given by the funders! Sinces ages🤣
English
1
0
4
511
Manoj Rawat🇮🇳 retweetet
Javier Blas
Javier Blas@JavierBlas·
We thought we were getting a TACO "Trump Always Chickens Out" But so far we are getting a NACHO "Not A Chance Hormuz Opens" (With appreciation to the trader who told me)
English
227
1.1K
7.4K
559.9K
Deepak Lal
Deepak Lal@dplal·
@SeaSkipper @RahulGandhi The govt of the day should answer and table this on Parliament:The real question should be answered transparentlyv and not the usual clak and dagger which is the govt wont.
English
2
0
10
1.4K
Soumya Dwibedi
Soumya Dwibedi@Som07189600·
@SeaSkipper @RahulGandhi I get it its close to malaca. But how are we going to control the int ship route? We cant simply because thats international waters. Only thing it can act as a tranship point for Indian ships but is it required also ?
English
6
0
14
2.9K