
Devin Bates
13.3K posts

Devin Bates
@SpassiJake
Blockchain developer. Passionate about decentralized systems and the future of finance. ⛓️ #Ethereum




RT : Grinding yaps on @KaitoAI taught me something: attention alone won't cut it conviction matters. The 100‑yap threshold and $KAITO allocations push you to earn reputation, not chase virality. When onramps, KYC and custody meet readable signals, Info‑Fi actually protects user agency 🔥 I'm stacking yaps and watching Surf and unbias turn signals into allocatable conviction you in?







Saw the Week 31 33 snapshot released by @0xSoulProtocol and dug through the notes briefly spun up the preview flow to see the cross-chain borrow story in action. Collateral stayed on the source chain while execution targeted another network, fewer approvals, no intermediate wrapped assets, and a noticeably smoother UX than the usual bridge-and-repeat routine This is the kind of plumbing that doesn't shout but quietly changes capital efficiency. If mainnet matches the snapshot, liquidity fragmentation becomes an execution problem, not an access one. I’m shifting a small allocation to monitor loyalty mechanics and any airdrop signals curious if others see this as the next layer for cross-chain credit or just an incremental UX win? #DeFi #crosschain #lending $SOUL

gQuacks 🦆 The grind on @wallchain creates a different kind of clarity. While everyone is distracted by noise, the leaderboard rewards those finding real infrastructure gems like @idOS_network Think about how many times you’ve abandoned a dapp because of a KYC wall. idOS fixes that friction permanently. One verification, encrypted data, zero hassle. It’s the kind of "boring" tech that actually unlocks mass adoption. Earning rewards for spotting the future of identity feels like a cheat code 🤯 Consistency compounds, fam. Don't let your mindshare fade 🤝




I wanted to see if client-side proving is more than a buzzword, so I used Miden to batch a swap, send, and note claim on my laptop. Local execution produced a tiny proof, the chain verified without rerunning my code. Atomic batches meant all steps succeed together or revert, no partials. It felt like moving from a giant computer to a proof checkpoint What surprised me: speed and silence. My inputs stayed private, yet settlement was snappy. With v0.13 splitting block building from proof generation in late December, 500 TPS starts to sound practical rather than promotional Want to try it? Bundle actions into a user-defined batch, generate (or delegate) the proof, submit, watch verification. Between the $25M seed and spinout from Polygon and apps like Lumina’s dark pool on the zkVM, @0xMiden is carving the private execution lane #ZK #privacy #rollup #Ethereum $ETH How would you use atomic batches in your app?




alpha: go give @OpenDroids a follow street season starts soon


I feel the war has aged me 100 years💔When will this misery end? When will we live like the rest of the world?💔 If you want to help us, the link below do so as much as you can🙏👇🏻 gofund.me/fd14389e9

分享一个v4 hook的坑 #code" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">bscscan.com/address/0x4442…
出于对hooks的不安,发现了这个奇怪的hook, 然后将它的代码喂给了ai,进行分析,发现它竟然在吃正滑点. 嗯,是的,正滑点,多余的币,会存在某个池子里,然后白名单用户,可以定期提现。 这种池子,并不是官方的大池子的hook, 应该是有人恶意创建的池子,然后如果有聚合器,或者bot的代码处理的有问题,比如min amount out设置了0,或者高滑点,就会被猛吃。 app.blocksec.com/explorer/tx/bs… 比如这笔提现,就吃了aster/stbl/usdt/bnb等等,价值9000刀,总共有14笔提醒,不知道总共赚了多少钱了。 说起来,创建特殊的hook池子,也算是链上一种特殊的邪修了,这看起,还是挺赚钱的啊,特别是新币开盘的时候,如果某些聚合器识别有问题,给它动态更新下参数,要麻透。 另外有些hook的lp fee很高,比如BNB/AIAV, - 2.6% LP Fee - 0.4% Protocol Fee 一来一回,6个点没了。 然后还要注意,有不少hooks,它的参数是可以动态调整的啊,哪天给你lp fee设置个80%,就爽歪歪了。 黑客新思路,如果有些hook,被大量池子采用,黑掉,更改参数...






🚨🚨BREAKING UPDATES 🚨 🇺🇸 Thune Sidesteps Question on White House Jan. 6 Claim On the fifth anniversary of the January 6 Capitol riot, Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) avoided commenting on a controversial new White House website. The site, launched today, blames Democrats for exaggerating the event and accuses Capitol Police of escalating tensions during what it calls a mostly peaceful protest. When asked if he agrees with blaming the police, Thune said only: "I haven't seen what they put on their website." The statement has sparked criticism, with many seeing it as an attempt to rewrite history. Over 140 officers were injured in the 2021 attack, which disrupted the election certification. Thune's brief response highlights Republican caution on the sensitive issue as President Trump pushes his narrative. Source: @atrupar

