St33l Mouse

21.3K posts

St33l Mouse

St33l Mouse

@St33lMouse

Skeptic. Gadfly commenter. Sci-fi fan. I count blocks as victories, so be my guest!

Beigetreten Haziran 2009
414 Folgt381 Follower
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@stephenituruka I don't either, but I know it is a job that needs doing and a tough, risky business.
English
0
0
0
3
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@WilsonLaw @vxunderground Yes. The EFF has succumbed to the long march into the institutions. They aren't the same people they were 20 or 30 years ago.
English
0
0
3
98
Wilson Law
Wilson Law@WilsonLaw·
There are key words littered through this through the messaging 1. People of Colour, queer folk, activists, and organisers 2. Platforms host mutual aid networks 3. Hubs for political organizing, cultural expression, and community care. This is socialist speak. We know why they are leaving X... it should be very very clear. Also about the abortion issue, know who their Social Media and Video manager is.
Wilson Law tweet media
English
4
3
112
1.7K
vx-underground
vx-underground@vxunderground·
The EFF provided additional clarification on why they left X but are remaining on places like Facebook and TikTok. If I'm being completely honest, I still don't understand their reasoning. They wrote that they're staying on Facebook, Instagram, and TikTok because "people there deserve access to information too" ... so ... are they implying people on X do not deserve access to this information? I don't understand. I'm not trying to be antagonistic or sarcastic either, I wholeheartedly do not understand what they're saying. Does anyone understand?
vx-underground tweet media
English
225
56
1.1K
35.6K
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@vxunderground Your not understand is perfectly natural, since they did not actually explain. The obvious question is: Why give up free publicity on X when cross posting costs nothing? They have not answered that, and clearly WILL NOT answer it.
English
0
0
0
60
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@VigilantFox He's got a point. Blow up some more stuff, then get out of there.
English
0
0
0
12
The Vigilant Fox 🦊
The Vigilant Fox 🦊@VigilantFox·
Bill Maher urges Trump to “cut and run” on Iran, says we “took the shot” and it “didn’t work.” “Six weeks ago, we thought it was the right thing to do to take this shot now to deal with Iran once and for all.” “We just don’t think jihadists and people who believe in martyrdom can have nukes.” “Six weeks later, I think we’re at a different place.” “You [Douglas Murray] think we’ve got to finish this no matter what it takes.” “I was never on that page. I was on the page, ‘This is a great opportunity. Hey, we see them all in one place, we can wipe out the whole leadership at once. It looks like they’re ready for an uprising. Take the shot, Mav. Take the shot.’” “We did it, and it didn’t work. Now what?” “I hope [Trump] does what America has always done… We always cut and run.” “We did it in Vietnam, we did it in Iraq. We did it to the Kurds. We did it in Afghanistan. Now we did it in Beirut. That’s us. No lifeguard on duty. If you get in with us, we are going to f*ck you.”
English
176
71
803
348K
Scott Nixon: @mrbrokeneyes.bsky.social
@EricIdle It’s not protecting free speech from anything. It’s protecting free speech for those he deems worthy of using what he thinks is free speech. Anyone else who, for example, uses free speech against him, the Orange man or anything they dislike get punished.
English
50
1
5
2.3K
Eric Idle
Eric Idle@EricIdle·
Protecting Free Speech from whom?
English
2.5K
247
3.4K
128.3K
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@EricIdle From Europe, the U.K., Australia, Brazil, and pretty much the entire world, these days. And from the Biden admin before Trump was elected. And the blue states, too.
English
0
0
1
8
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@cmuratori It still doesn't make sense. If they want to focus on those platforms, fine. But there is no cost to cross posting on X. Therefore, they're leaving X because they dislike X for reasons they're not willing to publicly admit to.
English
0
0
0
390
Casey Muratori
Casey Muratori@cmuratori·
I asked if EFF had posted a more complete explanation somewhere about leaving X while they remain on Facebook and TikTok. Turns out there's a blog post on their website with an entire section about it. I've included it here for other people who would like to read it in full.
Casey Muratori tweet media
English
57
6
186
20.1K
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@GBNEWS Capital goes where it's treated best.
English
0
0
0
16
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@ReclaimTheNetHQ That's actually kind of perfect, when you think about it. The EFF withdraws from a major platform because "it's not where the fight is", then locks replies. Both actions are the exact opposite of what they're supposed to be all about.
English
0
0
9
188
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@LundukeJournal @EFF They didn't say why they were leaving. Just a meandering talk about how the fight was no longer on X. OK, so WHY isn't the fight there, and why is it necessary to leave X?
English
0
0
0
170
The Lunduke Journal
The Lunduke Journal@LundukeJournal·
@EFF That virtue ain’t gonna signal itself! x.com/lundukejournal…
The Lunduke Journal@LundukeJournal

The @EFF has announced that they are leaving @X. But they will continue to use TikTok, BlueSky, Mastodon, Facebook, YouTube, & Instagram. Why? Something about “Young people, people of color, queer folks, activists, and organizers.” Oh, and funding abortions. Seriously. Abortions. The “Electronic Frontier Foundation” (founded to educate law enforcement and politicians on how computers work), is leaving X, but staying on TikTok. Because of “abortions” and “queer folk”. As a wise man once said, “That virtue ain’t gonna signal itself.”

English
1
66
1.9K
37.4K
EFF
EFF@EFF·
After almost twenty years on the platform, EFF is logging off of X. This isn’t a decision we made lightly, but it might be overdue. 🧵(1/5)
English
892
782
4.2K
4.1M
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@EFF So, uh, why are you leaving? You sounded like you were going somewhere with this, but you didn't say WHY you were leaving.
English
0
0
2
181
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@EricLDaugh It didn't take long for them to show how arbitrary and limited their control of the strait would be.
English
0
1
1
26
Eric Daugherty
Eric Daugherty@EricLDaugh·
🚨 JUST IN: Iran claims to mediators it will LIMIT Strait of Hormuz tanker traffic to roughly a DOZEN per day, and they'd have to coordinate with the IRGC A "HANDFUL" of tankers have sailed through the Strait of Hormuz since the Iranian ceasefire began JD Vance is leading negotiations on Saturday and the White House expects oil prices to PLUMMET soon MAKE IT HAPPEN! Hold them to it, or bring more FAFO 🔥
English
133
245
1.3K
262.7K
Michael Miller
Michael Miller@2grifters1wave·
@Ric_RTP Good thing he's not in charge. We're in a democracy. We cure things together. For better or worse. No gods, no kings (in charge of AI). IMO
English
1
0
12
532
Ricardo
Ricardo@Ric_RTP·
The CEO of Google DeepMind just admitted that if the decision had been his, we would've cured cancer before anyone ever used ChatGPT. And that's not even the scariest thing he said on a recent interview. Demis Hassabis is one of the most important people alive in AI. He won the Nobel Prize last year for AlphaFold, the system that cracked the 50 year protein folding problem. 3 million scientists now use his tool. Almost every new drug being developed will touch it at some stage. In a new interview, he was asked about the moment ChatGPT launched and Google went into "code red." His answer was one of the most revealing things any AI leader has ever said on the record: "If I'd had my way, I would have left AI in the lab for longer. Done more things like AlphaFold. Maybe cured cancer or something like that." Read that again. The man running Google's entire AI division is publicly saying the commercial AI race we're all living through was a MISTAKE. That the industry got hijacked by a chatbot when it could have been solving the biggest problems in science and medicine. His vision was simple: Build AI slowly, carefully, like CERN. Use it to crack root node problems one at a time. Cancer. Energy. New materials. Let humanity benefit from real breakthroughs while the foundational science was figured out over a decade or two. Then ChatGPT dropped in November 2022 and everything changed. Demis described what happened next as getting locked into a "ferocious commercial pressure race" that none of the labs can escape from. On top of that, the US vs China dynamic added geopolitical pressure. The result is everyone sprinting toward products instead of breakthroughs, shipping chatbots while the scientific opportunity gets buried under marketing cycles and quarterly earnings. But he's not saying progress isn't happening... He's saying the progress got redirected away from the things that actually matter most. And then it got even scarier: Because when Demis was asked what he worries about with AI, he laid out two threats. The first is what everyone talks about: Bad actors using AI for harm. Terrorist groups. Hostile nation states. Cyberattacks at scale. But that's not the threat he's most worried about. His second worry is AI itself going rogue. Not today's models. The models coming in the next two to four years as the industry enters what he calls "the agentic era." Systems that can complete entire tasks autonomously. Systems that are increasingly capable and increasingly hard to control. His exact words: "How do we make sure the guardrails are put in place so they do exactly what they've been told to do, and there's no way of them circumventing that or accidentally breaching those guardrails? That's going to be an incredibly hard technical challenge if you think about how powerful and smart and capable these systems eventually get." A Nobel Prize winner who runs one of the 3 most advanced AI labs on Earth just said publicly that within two to four years, we're entering a phase where AI alignment becomes a real problem, and the technical challenge of solving it is enormous. And almost nobody is paying enough attention. He called for international cooperation between labs, AI safety institutes, and academia to tackle the problem. He said this is the thing even the experts aren't thinking about enough. He said the only way to get through the AGI moment safely is if everyone starts treating this with the seriousness it deserves. Most AI CEOs give you careful PR answers about "responsible development" and move on. Demis said something different... He said the commercial race FORCED us into a premature deployment of a technology we barely understand, and the window to get alignment right before the next generation of agents shows up is two to four years. If the man who built the system that might cure cancer is telling you he wishes it had happened first, maybe we should listen to what he says is coming next.
English
292
1K
5.2K
904.1K
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@Ric_RTP No, we shouldn't listen to him. He is an elitist. He'd have kept the great discovery to a tiny priesthood "for the good of mankind". Then it would have spread to military and government. This elite, government control IS the nightmare scenario. Thank God it didn't happen.
English
0
0
0
113
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@DylanRatigan No, the Americans will leave without being asked. You'll get your wish, and then some. The rift has been growing for some time, and their departure will mark the beginning of a new era. Not a good one for Europe, I think.
English
0
0
0
6
St33l Mouse retweetet
Jesse Lynn♥️
Jesse Lynn♥️@jesseRoss597206·
If Elon moves forward with biometric authentication I will drop X like a bad habit & so will millions of others. Good luck with that. The arrogance of thinking this data harvesting platform is worth agenda 2030s digital prison is wild. Some will go for it. Many won't.
Aaron@aaronp613

BREAKING: X is working on biometric authentication to use the platform "Verify your identity to continue using X" "Biometric authentication required" It appears they are going to use "Amazon Rekognition Face Liveness"

English
796
1.9K
5.2K
84.7K
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@seamus_coughlin By the time they finish it, the price tag will be a trillion. The truth is they CAN'T finish it for any price. They've already proven that. The legal and political environment make it impossible, and they have the exact wrong people in charge to fix it.
English
0
0
0
19
Seamus (FreedomToons)
Seamus (FreedomToons)@seamus_coughlin·
If you were just complaining that a $4 billion dollar trip to space "could have fed the poor" but you're silent about the $126 billion dollar train to nowhere, it's time to stop pretending your politics have anything to do with feeding poor people
KTLA@KTLA

In a 60 Minutes report, officials said they now believe the rail line linking L.A. and San Francisco could ultimately cost about $126 billion, more than triple the original price tag approved by voters. ktla.com/news/californi…

English
534
6K
31.2K
1.4M
St33l Mouse
St33l Mouse@St33lMouse·
@FalconUpdatesHQ Oh, in that case we should go and leave them to figure it out for themselves.
English
0
0
2
1.4K
FalconUpdatesHQ
FalconUpdatesHQ@FalconUpdatesHQ·
BREAKING 🚨 🇸🇦 🇺🇸 🇮🇱 Saudi Arabia will not join any offensive actions against Iran involving the US & Israel 🚫 It has blocked the use of its bases and airspace for any strikes ⚡️Riyadh refuses to allow its territory to be used for US or Israeli military action against Tehran
English
250
2.1K
9.5K
474.6K