Tim 🍉

@GiveMeBanHammer Total number of people who bought the game cannot be derived from all time peak. It's entirely possible and probably easier to have more reviews than peak players in a short time with an unpopular and short game

Schizo time: This just seems odd to me... There's more positive reviews, than maximum players for Mixtape. Around over 1000 extra positive review. This is not unusual in itself, but its only a pattern you see with much older games, at least 3 years or older...like Skyrim, Left 4 Dead 2 or Elden Ring - because good reviews accumulate over the years. Mixtape just came out, 4 DAYS ago and already it shows a pattern seen almost only from games that are older than 3 years? This just seems out of the ordinary for me...

Dark souls arrives...2014...saves the entire medium...alright here's definitive proof dark souls 2 is the best of all souls game

@Critical_Scribe But it's only a rarity when you look at Western AAA titles. Those aren't the only games, play the ones you like

>A rarity in the modern day happens >”SHUT UP THEY HAVE ALWAYS BEEN DOING THIS!” The overcompensation here tells me that you were desperately looking for this example, and it comes from a card game. Come back to me when a Western AAA game embraces titillation like a game like Stellar Blade and I’ll be convinced the problem doesn’t exist anymore.

@4m4l3kBr1t @DoctorDisaster1 You're arguing about the past and it's definitive. She has a comms degree from an ivy league and and you're surprised she spoke her way to where she is. I said twice they should start consulting. If they want to make videos they can but it's not working clearly

@TWbro @DoctorDisaster1 So if that's the simplest way why didn't sarkeesian do it? If you think her method is so effective why is it not OK for others to copy said method? Your rhetoric is just infantile.

I want to make sure I get this straight - an activist infiltrated an industry that the chuds love, and the chuds want nothing to do with her because her activism is all about hating us, and this somehow proves that the chuds are just activists themselves. Seems a bit off to me.

@4m4l3kBr1t @DoctorDisaster1 Making games is just the simplest way to ensure the games you like are still around you didn't understand that. Anita changed the culture by doing something else which by the way the people you agree with aren't doing. They're making videos. They should start consulting I guess

@TWbro @DoctorDisaster1 Anita Sarkeesian: "Doesn't have to make games, just produce culture. Which she does by making videos criticising other peoples work." Everyone else: "Has to produce culture, which has to mean more than just making videos criticising other peoples work."

@4m4l3kBr1t @DoctorDisaster1 I already said you don't have to /make/ the games. You just have to produce culture. I don't see why you're asking why Anita doesn't have to do more when she is still in the space she's closer to influencing games than people who made videos on her years ago. They haven't Yes

@TWbro @DoctorDisaster1 So they should have done more than sarkeesian, but sarkeesian didn't need to do more? What games did she make? These goalposts are just all over the place, huh? So if someone goes into an art gallery and smears shite on the paintings that's just anti-painting and pro-shite?

@4m4l3kBr1t @DoctorDisaster1 I'll give you that producing videos is culture. But I should say that they should have done more that's why I said making games. You're fundamentally misunderstanding why she's producing culture. She's not anti-culture she's anti your culture and pro her culture get it?

@TWbro @DoctorDisaster1 "What do you call making vidoes reacting to her content?" "Producing culture." She changed the space by attacking it and attempting to destroy it. She is anti-culture. Going into an art gallery and smearing shit all over the paintings isn't "producing culture." That's her.

@4m4l3kBr1t @DoctorDisaster1 What do you call making videos reacting to her content? That's what was happening while journalism on her pick up. You can't say she doesn't produce culture when you would agree that she changed the space that's why it's called a culture war.

@TWbro @DoctorDisaster1 No, they were not. I'll repeat: Chuds didn't push her, positive or negative. Gaming journos and places like the UN did. She was everywhere. She doesn't produce culture. She attacks it and tries to destroy it.

@4m4l3kBr1t @DoctorDisaster1 Negative projection is still projection that's what reactionaries were doing. You don't have to /make/ the games to be able to criticize and the point isn't even to be critical it's to produce culture. Maybe I should've said the gamergate reactionaries should try consulting

@TWbro @DoctorDisaster1 And pretending people have to make games in order to be able to criticise it, or instead of criticising it, while defending sarkeesian who has made no games is just wild.

@4m4l3kBr1t @DoctorDisaster1 Aw you got me man fuck. Maybe in twelve years I'll still be recoiling from having this conversation fuck

@TWbro @DoctorDisaster1 Said the person reacting to other people expressing their views and opinions.

@4m4l3kBr1t @DoctorDisaster1 People who spent time being reactionaries during gamergate are likely still spending time being reactionaries today. When they should have been making games

@TWbro @DoctorDisaster1 What is this nonsense you are chatting?

@Ranting_Monkey You value life at $100?

I answered you directly in the first comment I saw. Don't take it so personally, you just provide a good example of the stupidity of people who would press blue. I don't know you. I have very limited history with your content. Your video came up when I googles this dumbass question masquerading as a deep philosophical conundrum I just thought since I was using you as an example it was kind to tag you in it. But since I have your attention, let's try a real world experiment. Everyone who see this should send me $100.00. If 50% of the people who see this send me $100.00, I'll send it back. If less than 50% send me $100.00, I keep it all. No death consequence but you can keep others from losing a hundred bucks. Or, you could press the red button and save your own money. Don't be selfish now, other people are relying on you to save them from giving me money. Don't let em down.

@trashjuicecube @realwruffian I suppose that fair but what I had to do was lock the car using the key in the door to make them roll up. What's the circuitry involved that would be different from me doing it from a distance with the fob?

@realwruffian @TWbro You need the circuitry used for auto close to avoid chopping toddler heads off and such

the humble 2006 acura tsx

@Kooale3256 @HserLoL It really is an unfortunate circumstance of internet discourse

@HserLoL -> Dont play the game and give it a bad review "How can you say its bad when you havent played -> Play the game and give it a bad review "Why did you play for so long if you dislike it" Cant win

how the fuck do you spend 210 hours playing a game you dont think is very good

@HserLoL Gaming as an industry got much bigger in the late 2010's and people stopped playing the games they liked and just played whatever was in front of them/popular

@KamenS0L I think most people struggle with not backing up because it seems counterintuitive and puts faith in the rest of the team (who should be looking out) who they may not be queued with. It's hard to grasp

People saying he doesn't play support when he's absolutely correct here. I play support the most and this is just facts. Backing up is actively selling. Taking time to do damage instead of healbotting is alot more impactful... Why do rivals players hate improving?

Just looked at Hawkeye and sighed

The ragebait was successful my friend. You were furycaught and wrathreeled