Terranox

@freddys_finger @MickamiousG I didn't say crimes weren't committed by others, I said the vast majority of crimes are Aussie males in that age range. So are we getting rid of them or not?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG Good comeback 🤡. So every Islamic hate preacher and African machete gang member is born here are they dumbass?

Well we were actually until individuals and groups got behind the destruction of your nation with the implementation of mass immigration policies. You can’t say ‘never will be a monoculture’ when we were once and still are a European Culture and we will return back to that, make no mistake Australia First is Inevitable

@freddys_finger @MickamiousG Wait you arent on board with this?

@freddys_finger @MickamiousG Thank goodness, we can get rid of the major perpetrator of criminal activity in this country - men born in Australia aged 18 - 34.

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG Than the military of a nation?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG Someone has greater force

Went into Werribee for the first time today in who knows how long…. I swear it’s been conquered by Indians What the hell is going in?! It’s like white folk don’t exist out here

@freddys_finger @MickamiousG "Fit in" meaning?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG What makes you think there needs to be 5 or more? Contribute, fit in and respect our way of life. In other words if you hate the way of life here and want to change it don’t come. Simple really

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG But if force doctrine is infallible, what is the risk?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG There hasn't been a need too. Quite obvious.

@MickamiousG Another made up number brought to you by Mick.

Politicians in Australia: “Australia is the best place to live in the world, it’s a vibrant healthy society where you can get ahead and live your best life” Reality: Australians will pay 80c in tax for every dollar they’ll ever earn and spend.

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG Doesnt the state employ the military? You have been saying "the people with power" make the calls. So if it isnt the leader of a country, and instead is the armed forces themselves, why havent they risen up to claim power?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG Probably because the military wouldn't support it?

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG England using military might to protect their nation is not what I mean. Let's say this, Keir Starmer refuses to resign and uses the military to preserve his position. Why didnt he elect to do that?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG Read what i wrote again.

@grok @MickamiousG Basing your whole argument on when it was "called Australia" is some dumb shit.

@MickamiousG Agreed. The nation-state of Australia emerged post-1788 with British settlement and federation in 1901. Its settler society was deliberately shaped as an Anglo-Celtic monoculture through the White Australia Policy from 1901 until the policy's end in the early 1970s.

Hey @grok Was Australia Ever a Monoculture society? Be Concise.

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG Are you referring to Hitler? I wouldn't call Hitler a democratic leader. Democratically elected sure, but Germany was fascist by that stage. Why doesnt a "democratic" leader do that?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG They havent? 🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣 So when the Germans attempted to invade England, what did they do? Did they just ask the Germans to pretty please respect their right as a nation or did they use their army and airforce?

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG But he could permanently sustain power by deploying the military. Why has no Western democratic leader secured their control in this manner?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG Declare a war against him. See if he sends the military against you. Then See if he uses it or not.

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG So why isn't Albo using it now? Or why didn't any LNP leader throughout the 2010's?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG You need the force first.

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG It's an unstoppable doctrine apparently.

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG Are you suggesting thats easy?

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG But why does Hanson bother with democratic processes and just raise a military force instead and seize power?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG I never shit it down. They can certainly try. Force doctrine doesn't discriminate. If Hanson won an election I am pretty sure those with force will protect the result. As they have done for every election.

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG But you still suggest at times you would raise some force to challenge a dominant power, but when minorities do that you shut it down because they dont have power. So if we want the Voice we should raise an army? If Hanson wants to be in charge she should ignore democracy?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG 🤣🤣🤣🤣 See now you're getting it!

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG My opinion is irrelevant to force doctrine.

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG What would you do?

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG So then does the person without the gun keel over, or fight back?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG Yes. They can try. But the one with the strongest force will win. The only reason people have rights is because the people with the strongest force can protect them. If there are two people in a forest. One claims to have a certain right and one has a gun. Does the right win?

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG Yes but you also say that people should resist with force, but then when you see a marginalised group try to assert their rights, you say they can't because the powerful group calls the shots.

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG My claim is that those with the most amount of Force hold all the cards. Look up force doctrine.

@Pubtest14 @MickamiousG It's the disjunct between assertion that those in power set rules and the rest comply (e.g. no Voice because Europeans dominated Australia), and your claim that raising a force to challenge is necessary. Should Indigenous groups use military force to make the Voice happen?

@TopShotTerra @MickamiousG No i dont think they should. Im not sure why this is a surprise to you? Its happened alot historically. USSR, China and Cuba just to name a few.