Travis Spomer
834 posts

Travis Spomer
@TravisSpomer
Follow me on Facebook if you want the Full Travis Experience™ with photos and music and stuff, or Instagram for just photos.
Redmond, WA Beigetreten Mart 2011
198 Folgt58 Follower
Travis Spomer retweetet
Travis Spomer retweetet
Travis Spomer retweetet

why’s the hinting on these devices so bad lol
anabology@anabology
This little thing has made me fall in love with reading again. So convenient
English

@_NatalieWould Sorry, miss, but no, not that—we meant that we’d kill another dog for free as part of the promotion.
English

@Skoog This was the print edition of The Onion. The ads might be my favorite part.
English

good lord this is perfect
Moongazer@joeybeastmarket
ive found the first 100% effective ad. pear time
English
Travis Spomer retweetet

Imagine that some deranged technologists notice one day that lemonade looks a lot like piss. You could almost confuse the two if you overlooked the taste, the smell, the source and the ingredients, and if you had no compunctions about drinking a lot of piss. By this point in Silicon Valley everyone has been guzzling piss for so long that most of them have forgotten they were only pretending to like the taste.
English

@rsms Writing code is a uniquely joyous method of creative expression, and I have no real interest in carving out tasks to delegate to mediocre programmers who have delivered unacceptably, uselessly poor results for me hundreds of times in a row.
English

It’s surprising to me that many programmers don’t believe in AI at all, like a full, hardline “no.”
A thesis is that generative slop has such “stage presence” + being alarmingly bad that it become people’s mental model of “AI.” That, along with nonchalant “vibe coders” on social media strikes a nerve with some people.
There is a whole category of actually useful, actually practical and truly valuable “AI” tools that help you make better software. I’m not talking about asking ChatGPT to write production code for you but tools like Codex and Cursor where an llm can “work” in a sandbox on your codebase. Have it improve your tests suite or ask it to write documentation or maybe summarize the general architecture. Or get a list of all “// TODO”s with context. Thinking of these tools as “a bunch of mediocre programmers who will do anything for you” seems to be a sweet spot. These tools won’t generally write high-quality code or make smart architectural decisions, but these tools can do a lot of “grunt work” for you.
English
Travis Spomer retweetet
Travis Spomer retweetet







