W

23.2K posts

W banner
W

W

@WisconsinDummy

if you say that my name fits, you lose twelve social credit.

Wisconsin, USA Beigetreten Ocak 2018
405 Folgt193 Follower
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
I think Rubio is amazing, because he is basically a post-neoliberal that can feasibly undo a lot of the mistakes Reagan and progressives made while selling it as a sane idea to the establishment itself.
W@WisconsinDummy

@NewReaganCaucus Yet you simp for Rubio who has purged foreign aid, shrunk the State Department, cracked down on student visas, deported people to El Salvador prisons, and one of the people who coined the term “common-good capitalism.” I don’t mind this. But it doesn’t sound Reaganite to me.

English
0
0
0
2
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
@NewReaganCaucus Yet you simp for Rubio who has purged foreign aid, shrunk the State Department, cracked down on student visas, deported people to El Salvador prisons, and one of the people who coined the term “common-good capitalism.” I don’t mind this. But it doesn’t sound Reaganite to me.
English
0
0
0
6
The Reagan Caucus
The Reagan Caucus@NewReaganCaucus·
We will never endorse JD Vance. He offers literally nothing to conservatives.
English
57
70
1K
15.3K
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
@JessicaNutt96 I mean… If you genuinely think the war is going bad, logic dictates that Vance is a better option than Rubio, at least on this specific issue.
English
0
0
0
145
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
It’s just the people that are like “War Bad, Vance Bad, Rubio Good,” which aren’t the whole population, but sizable enough, are just baffling and spurting nonsense.
English
0
0
0
7
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
Vance critics who oppose the Iran War while praising Rubio baffle me. Of course supporting the war and Rubio adds up, and so does opposing the war and Rubio. Supporting Vance and opposing the war on principle but supporting actions since the war started also adds up.
Nahal Toosi@nahaltoosi

NEW COLUMN: Did everyone forget that Marco Rubio is the White House national security adviser? That means that more than any American official except President Trump, he's responsible for how the Iran war is going. So why is his political star on the rise? politico.com/news/magazine/…

English
1
0
0
20
W retweetet
The Middle-earth Mixer
The Middle-earth Mixer@MiddleearthMixr·
Apparently it’s going to be about the Tom Bombadil chapters left out of the Peter Jackson films: My prediction is Sam’s daughter stumbles upon some section of the Red Book that describes the experience and they go back in time. Bookmark this. Admittedly, this concept is interesting to me, and Stephen Colbert’s passion for LOTR and his personal Catholic faith (although it doesn’t seem to penetrate his public beliefs at all) seems to be the only things he doesn’t have brain worms about so maybe he could tell a faithful adaptation. My outlook though is grim because nothing that comes out of Hollywood for the most part has the ability to properly capture Light and Truth unless it’s by accident.
Variety@Variety

NEW 'LORD OF THE RINGS' MOVIE Stephen Colbert is co-writing "The Lord of the Rings: Shadow of the Past" (working title), which will go into production after "The Hunt for Gollum." The synopsis: "Fourteen years after the passing of Frodo - Sam, Merry, and Pippin set out to retrace the first steps of their adventure. Meanwhile, Sam’s daughter, Elanor, has discovered a long-buried secret and is determined to uncover why the War of the Ring was very nearly lost before it even began." Colbert is co-writing the script with his son, Peter McGee, and franchise veteran Philippa Boyens. variety.com/2026/film/news…

English
66
15
531
79.2K
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
Some thoughts. 1. Stephen Colbert genuinely is an expert on Tolkien’s works, so it’s not the dumbest choice in the world 2. He’s absolutely going to insert in modern politics into the movie and it’s going to ruin it.
English
0
0
0
9
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
@PastorMarvy “Why didn’t China use this opportunity to start World War III?”
English
0
0
0
4
W retweetet
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
@Zaoist4 We sacrificed our long term global reputation for some minor middle eastern gains that not even Israel was supportive of. Additionally, we committed serious acts of cruelty on their population, further delegitimizing our reputation.
English
0
0
0
8
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
“No, Trump can’t do something brave and cool. It must be staged!”
English
0
0
0
7
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
Do not repeat the JCPOA. We need measures to make sure another war does not start again.
English
0
0
0
8
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
An Iran deal needs to 1. Reduce the oppression apparatus 2. Eliminate funding for terror proxies 3. Have some material gain for the US (even if small or minor) 4. Address the nuclear issue. I’m sure 3 and 4 will be discussed, but what worries me is a lack of 1 and 2.
English
1
0
0
21
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
@CountryFirstRep None of them did. Last president to get foreign policy was HW Bush. Though Clinton and Trump had foreign policy wins too.
English
0
0
1
51
W retweetet
Star 🇻🇪
Star 🇻🇪@DaStarKnight·
Im a cat owner, do NOT do this, this is clearly abusive behavior When cats move like this, it's a clear sign that they're about to EXPLODE and DIE
Kathleen@tmszhjh88

It's too stable.

English
52
879
13.7K
148.5K
W
W@WisconsinDummy·
@devahaz Pivot?
Čeština
0
0
0
36