Michael Aquinas

Credit: @ k.t.finley ⚜️ (instagram.com/stories/highli…) [x.com/aquinas_michae…]

@CMG81244700 @GerryHassan @ScotNational Likewise! 🤍

@aquinas_michael @GerryHassan @ScotNational Bless you and your family, hoping you have a lovely summer

Malcolm Offord is the Reform leader in Scotland & Nigel Farage's man north of the border. His offensive & homophobic comments on George Michael show he is unfit to hold any public office. Well done to @ScotNational for printing his comments. thenational.scot/politics/25966…

Men of God confirm that Women: 🤍 have a "purer influence" 🤍 are "naturally more virtuous" 🤍 are "naturally more honest and unselfish than men" 🤍 are "the most religious, the most moral & the most sober portion of the American people" Sources in Thread: x.com/aquinas_michae…

@ladies4pd @malinformedtv @Eleven_twenT2 Indeed, it's always very telling when men would 'rather have women lose the right to vote' than have the worst McEpsteins in the world lose the right to vote – men who want to reduce all women to serfs, deserve to be reduced to punitive serfdom themselves. x.com/aquinas_michae…

@LordGhannon @gracemthorp @BrittanyXVenti Of course you prefer degenerate men like Prince Andrew + P. Diddy over Christian women who save children from nonces like him. x.com/aquinas_michae…

@CMG81244700 @GerryHassan @ScotNational Men should remember that the most powerful saint is a woman – she outranks even all the angels, so misogynists are in for a shock :)

@aquinas_michael @GerryHassan @ScotNational Thank you for the work you do speaking up for women, and providing statistics!

@cenkuygur @joerogan True (within reason) – that said: Anyone who disagrees re: basic human rights + dignity is an enemy against justice (people in good faith may have different understandings of the best ways to handle things, yet people in bad faith lack well-meaning intentions in the first place).

I said a lot of people on the left were misunderstanding @joerogan and all the independent podcasters. They didn't agree with us on everything, but they weren't MAGA. Others said they were hard core MAGA extremists. Here's what Rogan just said about some of the people in MAGA, "a lot of them are dorks. A lot of them these really weird fucking uninteresting, unintelligent people." The world is not black and white. Everyone who disagrees with you on a couple of issues is not your enemy. People have been taught to hate one another. Especially if you're on the left, you have to break that cycle of hatred, rather than feed into it.

@GerryHassan @ScotNational Odd how headlines don't seem to point out the "joke's" blatant racism + sexual harassment + mockery of the dead as problems.

@simplydapperaf @Telegraph #Immigration #ImmigrationLaw #HumanitarianParole #HumanitarianGrounds

@simplydapperaf @Telegraph Why should he be punished for his parents' mistake? He was a minor, so if he hasn't committed violent crimes or similar then he should be allowed to remain on humanitarian grounds – the state's right to deport is not absolute, as moral law trumps secular law.

🗣️ ‘ICE deported me to Britain – it’s a dump’ Immigrants sent to the UK by the US say they lack support to survive in a strange land. Watch the full report here ⬇️ youtube.com/watch?v=7enjlO…

@SWPatriot1NYS @simplydapperaf @Telegraph Try to act more like a human/less like an inhumane demon, otherwise God may send you similar challenges in life – humanitarian grounds can protect people from deportation, yes: - Humanitarian Parole - Prosecutorial Discretion - Asylum Laws - T&U Visas - DACA - SIJS - VAWA - TVPRA

@aquinas_michael @simplydapperaf @Telegraph Humanitarian grounds? Is the UK at war on its homeland? Are ppl starving or is there a drought? 😆 🤣 😂

@bar_doors @simplydapperaf @Telegraph "Ignorantia juris non excusat" in an absolutist context is pagan irrationality, akin to murdering children for their fathers' crimes. Crass/Vincible Ignorance = Culpable Naive/Invincible Ignorance = Not Culpable (otherwise the state could have arrested you as a toddler) Examples:

@bar_doors @simplydapperaf @Telegraph Lambert v. California (1957) Cheek v. United States (1991) Ratzlaf v. United States (1994) Staples v. United States (1994) United States v. Pennsylvania Industrial Chemical Corp. (1973)

@twetrbirb @ZalinskyS @simplydapperaf @Telegraph @ Zalinsky – Yes, it is how The Law works (including legally binding human rights legislation) as Divine Law overrides secular law: Lex iniusta non est lex.

@ZalinskyS @aquinas_michael @simplydapperaf @Telegraph When someone asks "why" something is the way it is, that is a normative question. The question is not asking how the law works, but, as he said in his post, "why".

@oliver_scotch @giovannitweet @ILeonardaJonie Christ commands chivalry + charity, whether you agree or not – grow up.

Why Women SUCK!