Angehefteter Tweet
beevirr
372 posts

beevirr
@beerriv
Eye of Horus Thread/IG: beerriv TikTok: cogitoergosumVenus
Beigetreten Nisan 2026
1 Folgt30 Follower

Adam in Hebrew means “man” or “human kind”
“Mankind , living wholly on the material plane, is hence a beast (666) physically, mentally and emotionally”
This was quoted from Dr. George Carey book God - Man The Word Made Flesh.
When I think of Eve I think of “Evening, Christmas Eve” Christmas Eve is the night before Christmas. Christ is the sun. Which makes Lilith the night who is Eve.
English

The Bible says Adam and Eve were the first people
It does not say they were the only people
In fact it even implies that they were not
Kelvin O johnson@_OKJ__
Only reasonable explanation to be honest.
English

@brain_stimulus I love to learn. Wow. I want to know more about this. I wonder if anyone wrote a book on Pearl Harbor and their meth use.
English

🥬⚠️ LA VÉRITÉ CHOQUANTE SUR POPEYE QUE PERSONNE NE VOULAIT VOUS DIRE !
😱❗Popeye n’a jamais mangé d’épinards.
💥Il prenait de la Pervitine — de la méthamphétamine militaire de grade A — et les créateurs ont fait d’un vétéran drogué un héros pour enfants.
🔥Preuves dans la vidéo :
Ses tatouages : 12-7-41 (date de Pearl Harbor) et 1177 (USS Arizona)
En 1942, la Navy distribuait des pilules vertes de méthamphétamine… que les marins appelaient « spinach »
Le timing exact : 3 minutes pour que la meth fasse effet = durée exacte de la transformation dans les épisodes
Son œil toujours fermé = paralysie faciale partielle due à une overdose
Ses rires maniaques et sa force extrême = symptômes classiques d’intoxication aiguë à l’amphétamine
Olive n’est pas sa petite amie… c’est une infirmière psychiatrique qui essaie de le contenir
Brutus ne kidnappe pas Olive… il tente de la protéger
La série entière documente le trauma de guerre et l’institutionnalisation psychiatrique d’un vétéran du Pacifique.
Nous avons regardé des générations entières applaudir de l’addiction et du PTSD déguisés en comédie nautique.
Regardez la vidéo jusqu’au bout. C’est glaçant.😱
Français

Good ol’ ancient civilization. I truly admire thought who really want to learn and went back to the ancestors for answers.
Greeks and Romans respected Egyptians. They created mystery schools that were Egyptian based. Philosophers like Socrates, Plato, Seneca all learned from Egyptian mysteries schools.
English

Ancient Egypt already solved microplastics. We spent billions relearning it.
Scientists just confirmed that one seed from the Moringa tree removes 98% of tested PVC microplastics from tap water.
Egyptians, Greeks, and Romans used this tree for water purification for thousands of years.
One seed cleans 10 liters. No chemicals. No toxic byproducts. Renewable.
Biodegradable.
Modern water treatment plants use alum — a synthetic chemical process that produces toxic sludge.
The Moringa tree outperforms it.
We built billion-dollar systems to solve a problem nature already solved before recorded history.
What else did the ancient world know that we’ve forgotten?
English

@Art0fLife_ I can recognize a grifter when I see one. Study others and take their content and refuse to practice what he preaches. Yes, not one lie told. However a broken clock is right twice a day.
English


@DoctorLemma “Pigcasso” is so cute lol. Makes sense George Clooney would purchase her art. I recall him saying he use to own a pig.
English

A piglet rescued from an industrial farm in South Africa in 2016 was put in a stall with various objects to keep her busy. She ate or destroyed every single one of them except the paintbrushes. The woman who’d rescued her, a former pro golfer named Joanne Lefson, took the hint. She taught the pig to hold a brush in her mouth and touch it to a canvas.
By the time Pigcasso passed last year at 700 kilograms, her abstract paintings had been collected by George Clooney and her brushwork licensed by Swatch for a limited-edition watch called Flying Pig, which retailed at around $110. In 2018 she became the first animal in history to host her own solo art exhibition, in Cape Town. They called it OINK. One of her canvases, Wild and Free, later sold to a German collector for $25,000.
Total raised for the sanctuary that took her in: over a million dollars.
English

@NFL_DovKleiman I’m not on dating sites…. However I doubt he went to Hinge for “women”.
English

@HDaniels1959 @ihtesham2005 Your entire point is moot due to name calling.
English

@beerriv @ihtesham2005 It's not criteria, you idiot. It's performance. You either are good at fluid reasoning or you're bad at it. You either have deep or shallow crystalized knowledge.
English

A Stanford psychologist spent 35 years trying to prove that high IQ produced genius. He selected 1,528 of the smartest children in California and tracked them for the rest of their lives.
Not one of them won a Nobel Prize. Two of the boys he had rejected from the study won the Nobel Prize in Physics.
The trait he had built his entire career on did not predict the thing he thought it predicted.
His name was Lewis Terman. The study is one of the most honest accidents in modern psychology.
In 1921, Terman was the most famous psychologist in America. He had translated and adapted the original French intelligence test into the version that would dominate American schools for the next 50 years.
He called it the 'Stanford-Binet'. He believed, with the certainty of a man who had built a career on a single idea, that intelligence was the master variable behind every form of human achievement. The doctors, the inventors, the senators, the artists, the great writers and great scientists. All of them, in his model, were sitting at the top end of the same bell curve. If you could find the children with the highest scores, you could predict the future leaders of the country.
So he set out to prove it.
He sent his research team into California schools and screened roughly 168,000 children. He had teachers nominate their brightest pupils. He gave the nominees the Stanford-Binet. He kept the ones who scored 135 or higher, which placed them in roughly the top one percent of the population. The final sample was 1,528 children, average age 11. They had a name in his lab notebooks within a year. Termites.
He planned to follow them for the rest of their lives. He died in 1956 having tracked them for 35 years. Stanford kept the study going. The last surviving Termites were tracked until the 2000s. The data set is one of the longest continuous psychological studies in human history.
Here is what the data showed.
The Termites did well. They went to college at higher rates than their peers. They earned more money. They became professors and engineers and lawyers and physicians at higher rates than the general population.
Terman was not entirely wrong. High IQ is correlated with conventional success. The correlation is real and the effect size is meaningful.
But that was not what he had set out to prove.
He had set out to prove that high IQ produces genius. The kind of genius that wins Nobel Prizes, writes great novels, founds new fields, and reshapes the technological direction of the world. And on that specific question, the dataset turned on him.
None of the 1,528 Termites won a Nobel Prize. None of them won a Pulitzer. None of them became world-class musicians. None of them produced a single piece of work that historians of science or art still talk about. They were accomplished. They were comfortable. They were not, in any sense Terman would have recognized in his original ambition, geniuses.
The detail that haunts the study is what happened to the children he rejected.
In the screening phase, his team had tested two boys named William Shockley and Luis Alvarez. Both scored below the cutoff. Both were sent home. Shockley went on to co-invent the transistor and win the 1956 Nobel Prize in Physics, the same year Terman died. He founded the company that seeded the entire ecosystem we now call Silicon Valley. Alvarez won the 1968 Nobel Prize in Physics for his work on subatomic particles, and later proposed the asteroid impact theory of dinosaur extinction that turned out to be correct, too.
Two of the most consequential American physicists of the 20th century had been measured by Terman's own instrument and judged not gifted enough to be worth tracking.
There is an important caveat here that the more honest critics have raised in recent years. A 2020 simulation study from researchers at Utah Valley University showed that even with a perfect IQ test, the base rate of Nobel Prizes is so vanishingly low that Terman would have been statistically unlikely to catch a future laureate in any sample of his size, no matter where he set the cutoff.
The Shockley and Alvarez story is dramatic but it does not, on its own, prove that IQ does not matter. It proves that rare outcomes are hard to predict from any single variable, including a very good one.
That caveat is real. It is also not the most important thing the study showed.
The most important thing the study showed is what Terman himself eventually admitted, late in his career, in a quieter voice than he had used for the previous three decades. He wrote that the relationship between intelligence and achievement was, in his words, far from perfect. Within the Termite sample itself, the highest-IQ children did not become the most accomplished adults.
The variation in outcomes inside the group of geniuses was enormous, and IQ explained almost none of it. Some of the Termites had unremarkable careers. Some of the Termites had remarkable ones. The thing that distinguished the two groups was not the score he had used to select them.
What distinguished them, when researchers eventually analyzed the data more carefully, was a cluster of traits Terman had not been measuring. Persistence. Curiosity. Health. Stable family circumstances.
The willingness to keep going when a project stopped being interesting and started being hard. Most of the Termites who went on to do meaningful work were not the ones with the highest scores. They were the ones who had spent decades grinding on a single problem.
The lesson is the part that should change how anyone reading this thinks about talent.
The trait you select for is the trait you optimize for. If you measure children on a test of pattern recognition and verbal recall, you will find children who are good at pattern recognition and verbal recall. You will not find the children who will spend 30 years thinking about a single equation. You will not find the children who will quietly read the same difficult book six times.
You will not find the children whose curiosity is wider than their working memory. Those traits do not show up on the test you are running, which means they do not show up in the dataset you build.
Terman spent his life trying to find genius and ended up proving that he had been measuring the wrong thing all along. The kids he rejected were not stupider than the kids he kept. They were running a different program underneath, and his instrument could not see it.
The trait you can measure is almost never the trait that actually matters.
Most people building careers, hiring teams, and raising children are still selecting for the version of the trait that fits on a test.

English

@Kharlos013 @TRHLofficial You’re absolutely welcome. I misspoke by adding “crime”. I meant *from*.
English

@beerriv @TRHLofficial Good description of human behavior and its cycles. Good read.
English

@HDaniels1959 @ihtesham2005 Failing is the wrong word to use. All apologies.
I have seen one of these I.Q. Test and know I won’t meet the criteria that they’re seeking. Whatever that is. However everything I said on my original statement stands. Thank you for your added information.
English

@beerriv @ihtesham2005 There's no such thing as "failing an I.Q. test".
Your score is just your score. It being a high or low score is relative to your fellow test-takers.
Those who do better than most test-takers have an easier time solving life's cognitive tests, as every such test is an I.Q. test.
English

@Gabriele_Corno Even females in marine life are protecting themselves against males.
English

Female octopuses have been seen throwing rocks and other objects at annoying males that refuse to leave them alone. Researchers observing them in the wild noticed the females aiming the objects to push the males away.
Scientists believe this surprising behavior shows just how intelligent, aware, and expressive octopuses really are.
English

In 1997, a Japanese man stopped speaking to his wife after an argument and stayed silent for 20 years. Despite living in the same house and raising three children together, he refused to talk to her, communicating only through nods and gestures.
In 2017, after their son contacted a TV show to help reunite them, the husband finally apologized in a public meeting arranged at a park ending two decades of silence.

English

How to remedy this, you can listen to vinyls in a receiver speakers, play some singing bowls and tuning forks a couple of times a day also, believe it or not… house music. Brings in a frequency (I’m not knowledgeable with numbers however I see how children respond to it) that pulsates the pineal gland. If you play house music around children, pay attention to how they respond.
English

@elorwelliano I was just thinking this is the beginning of an ending before I read the last line. There’s a shake down happening……
English

NUEVA YORK: CRÓNICA DE UNA MUERTE ANUNCIADA
🚨🇺🇸 Goldman Sachs huye de Nueva York y deja en pánico al alcalde socialista Mamdani.
El alcalde de Nueva York enfrenta un duro golpe tras confirmarse que Goldman Sachs, uno de los gigantes históricos de Wall Street, está obligando a cientos de sus gerentes y empleados a elegir entre mudarse a Dallas, Texas, o Salt Lake City, o abandonar la empresa por completo, debido a los insostenibles costos operativos provocados por los aumentos de impuestos y regulaciones impulsados por su administración socialista.
El éxodo masivo de la icónica firma hacia estados más amigables con los negocios marca el inicio de un colapso económico anunciado en la Gran Manzana.
Español

@Lifewhenyou @Mimshack20 How many babies is was she carrying? I’d say four.
English













