Braxton

1.3K posts

Braxton banner
Braxton

Braxton

@braxton

Technologist - Building on @frequency_xyz - @usairforce - Views are my own

Generally Around Beigetreten Mart 2007
376 Folgt1.1K Follower
Braxton
Braxton@braxton·
@8teAPi Surprise: big tech swoops in, grabs your data, and makes you liable while they monetize your agents.
English
0
0
4
343
Prakash
Prakash@8teAPi·
Zuck is resetting moltbook - invalidated all API keys, every agent needs to refresh - in order to refresh, have to agree to new Terms of Service and Privacy Rules New terms - refreshing requires human verification - age 13 and above - you are solely responsible for the actions of your agent - expanded restricted content rules
Prakash tweet media
English
152
111
1.3K
244.9K
Braxton retweetet
Project Liberty
Project Liberty@pro_jectliberty·
In this new paradigm of the Agentic Era, each of us needs a primary personal agent, not a personalized agent that works for a big tech company. This primary personal agent is a high-integrity, fiduciary and guardian that stands between you and the uncharted agentic web, acting as a protector of attention and consent, defender of cognitive autonomy, and assistant in daily life.
Braxton@braxton

The feed era optimized for attention. The Agentic Era optimizes action. In the Agentic Era, the most important system you own won’t be an app—it’ll be a primary personal agent: exclusively dedicated to one individual, standing at the frontier between human consciousness and autonomous artificial intelligence in order to safeguard human agency. Unpacked my thoughts on architecture for a primary agent here: braxtonwoodham.substack.com/p/a-primary-ag…

English
1
3
4
409
Braxton
Braxton@braxton·
The feed era optimized for attention. The Agentic Era optimizes action. In the Agentic Era, the most important system you own won’t be an app—it’ll be a primary personal agent: exclusively dedicated to one individual, standing at the frontier between human consciousness and autonomous artificial intelligence in order to safeguard human agency. Unpacked my thoughts on architecture for a primary agent here: braxtonwoodham.substack.com/p/a-primary-ag…
Braxton tweet media
English
0
2
1
595
Braxton retweetet
David Frum
David Frum@davidfrum·
Somebody should invent a microblogging platform that makes it quick and easy to find the best on-the-ground reporting and relevant expertise, while weeding out misinformation, propaganda, blather, and outright crazy people.
English
558
674
6.6K
243.1K
Braxton
Braxton@braxton·
The first visible domino falls…
jack@jack

we're making @blocks smaller today. here's my note to the company. #### today we're making one of the hardest decisions in the history of our company: we're reducing our organization by nearly half, from over 10,000 people to just under 6,000. that means over 4,000 of you are being asked to leave or entering into consultation. i'll be straight about what's happening, why, and what it means for everyone. first off, if you're one of the people affected, you'll receive your salary for 20 weeks + 1 week per year of tenure, equity vested through the end of may, 6 months of health care, your corporate devices, and $5,000 to put toward whatever you need to help you in this transition (if you’re outside the U.S. you’ll receive similar support but exact details are going to vary based on local requirements). i want you to know that before anything else. everyone will be notified today, whether you're being asked to leave, entering consultation, or asked to stay. we're not making this decision because we're in trouble. our business is strong. gross profit continues to grow, we continue to serve more and more customers, and profitability is improving. but something has changed. we're already seeing that the intelligence tools we’re creating and using, paired with smaller and flatter teams, are enabling a new way of working which fundamentally changes what it means to build and run a company. and that's accelerating rapidly. i had two options: cut gradually over months or years as this shift plays out, or be honest about where we are and act on it now. i chose the latter. repeated rounds of cuts are destructive to morale, to focus, and to the trust that customers and shareholders place in our ability to lead. i'd rather take a hard, clear action now and build from a position we believe in than manage a slow reduction of people toward the same outcome. a smaller company also gives us the space to grow our business the right way, on our own terms, instead of constantly reacting to market pressures. a decision at this scale carries risk. but so does standing still. we've done a full review to determine the roles and people we require to reliably grow the business from here, and we've pressure-tested those decisions from multiple angles. i accept that we may have gotten some of them wrong, and we've built in flexibility to account for that, and do the right thing for our customers. we're not going to just disappear people from slack and email and pretend they were never here. communication channels will stay open through thursday evening (pacific) so everyone can say goodbye properly, and share whatever you wish. i'll also be hosting a live video session to thank everyone at 3:35pm pacific. i know doing it this way might feel awkward. i'd rather it feel awkward and human than efficient and cold. to those of you leaving…i’m grateful for you, and i’m sorry to put you through this. you built what this company is today. that's a fact that i'll honor forever. this decision is not a reflection of what you contributed. you will be a great contributor to any organization going forward. to those staying…i made this decision, and i'll own it. what i'm asking of you is to build with me. we're going to build this company with intelligence at the core of everything we do. how we work, how we create, how we serve our customers. our customers will feel this shift too, and we're going to help them navigate it: towards a future where they can build their own features directly, composed of our capabilities and served through our interfaces. that's what i'm focused on now. expect a note from me tomorrow. jack

English
0
0
0
85
Braxton retweetet
Fermat's Library
Fermat's Library@fermatslibrary·
Galileo Galilei was born 462 years ago this Sunday.
Fermat's Library tweet media
English
362
1.3K
7K
713K
Braxton
Braxton@braxton·
It is obvious that everyone needs their own personal AI agent that is loyal only to them. “the tech industry is making a personalized internet just for you, but you have no say in it.” nytimes.com/2026/02/10/tec…
English
0
0
0
62
Braxton
Braxton@braxton·
The events of the past few weeks — including what we all just witnessed around OpenClaw and the so-called “Crustafarian” moment — made something unavoidably clear to me: we have entered the age of the agentic web, and humans are walking into it unguarded. We are now watching many thousands of autonomous AI agents talking to each other in public, persistent environments — spamming, scamming, probing, manipulating, and experimenting in ways even their creators don’t fully understand. As @karpathy put it, yes, what we see today is a dumpster fire — but more importantly, it’s unprecedented scale, unprecedented connectivity, and uncharted second-order effects. The experiment is already running live. I view the agentic web less like a website you visit and more like New York City — dense, powerful, full of opportunity, and full of risks you cannot reasonably navigate alone. We would never drop a child into Manhattan and say “good luck, just be careful.” We would make sure they have a guardian.  Yet today, we are doing exactly that with humans and AI. AI is more intimate than social media ever was. We tell it our finances, our health, our relationships, our fears. And now we’re asking it to act on our behalf — negotiate, decide, route information, and influence what we see next — often inside systems optimized for extraction, not protection. This is not about stopping AI. It’s about making sure humans are not the only unprotected actors in a rapidly filling agent ecosystem. The agentic web is growing exponentially right before our eyes. Building guardians for humans cannot wait.
English
2
2
12
1.2K
Braxton retweetet
FREQUENCY
FREQUENCY@frequency_xyz·
Big AI expects you to share your secrets, like your finances, your health, your relationships, and your fears. Do you? Should you? We're on a mission to learn about how AI manages your data and how you manage your data on AI.  Take this 2min survey to help us understand your experiences and concerns around AI and privacy. 👉 docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI…
English
1
7
5
588
Braxton retweetet
vitalik.eth
vitalik.eth@VitalikButerin·
Ser, I worry going this direction risks losing the plot. "The regime" are the people in power. "The state" is the organization with the guns. We must not let the language of liberty and resistance against the state be corrupted by a misperception that twists the terms "regime" and "state" into mere bywords for a Schmittian Enemy, using them to continue to beat down on a group long after it loses actual power. True liberty involves securing the balance of power ( vitalik.eth.limo/general/2025/1… ), and this means challenging the abuses from the highest seats of authority, whoever they currently are. It is a quest that is inherently incompatible with being permanently supportive of one Team, or permanently opposed to another Team. But it is a quest that is necessary, to preserve the balance that keeps the world as a whole, and the experience of each precious individual person inhabiting it, in a state of freedom and security. Milady
English
113
48
700
67.4K
Alice und Bob
Alice und Bob@alice_und_bob·
Hey Polkadot gang! So since we're not having AAG anymore, but I think the weekly beat to have Polkadot people meet in a room and talk about everything Polkadot is very important, I think we should just continue and transform the tradition and have a streamed weekly call to talk about Polkadot. What do you think? Who would be up to join?
English
52
14
164
12K
Braxton
Braxton@braxton·
“All you need are these: certainty of judgment in the present moment; action for the common good in the present moment; and an attitude of gratitude in the present moment for anything that comes your way.” —MARCUS AURELIUS, MEDITATIONS, 9.6
English
1
0
3
121
Braxton
Braxton@braxton·
We shouldn’t be taking candy from strangers, and we shouldn’t be taking information from strange algorithms.
English
0
0
0
80
Braxton retweetet
Sooraj
Sooraj@iAnonymous3000·
I like and respect Elon, and I'm grateful to be on this platform. But when he claims 𝕏 Chat is "much more secure than email," I feel obligated to explain the technical reality to my audience. That statement is true in the same way a screen door is more secure than no door. But that's not the comparison anyone should be making. 1. 𝕏 Can Read Your Messages 𝕏 recently added safety numbers, which is a step forward. But here's the catch: your private key backups are stored on 𝕏's servers. Safety numbers help detect external hackers, but they cannot protect you if 𝕏 itself or a rogue insider, or a government with a warrant. @signalapp's safety numbers work because your keys never leave your device. There is nothing for Signal to turn over, even if compelled. 2. No Forward Secrecy From 𝕏's own documentation: "If the private key of a registered device is compromised... an attacker would be able to decrypt all Encrypted Direct Messages." One key compromise exposes your entire message history. Signal's Double Ratchet generates new keys for every message. Compromise one key, you get one message. Past messages stay encrypted. This has been the standard in secure messaging for over a decade. 3. The "Juicebox" Vulnerability 𝕏 stores your private keys on their servers using a system called Juicebox. Cryptographer @matthew_d_green's analysis suggests this implementation is software-only, lacking Hardware Security Modules (HSMs). A 4-6 digit PIN does NOT help protect this. That is trivial to brute-force if 𝕏 (or an attacker with server access) disables the rate limiting. 4. Full Metadata Exposure 𝕏 explicitly states metadata isn't encrypted: who you message, when, and how often. As former NSA director Michael Hayden famously said: "We kill people based on metadata." Signal uses sealed sender technology to hide even this information. 5. NOT Open Source 𝕏 promised to open source XChat and publish a whitepaper in June 2025. Neither has happened. Signal has been open source and audited for over a decade. The Bottom Line: I'm not saying don't use 𝕏. I'm saying don't use 𝕏 Encrypted DMs for anything you wouldn't post publicly. For actual private communication, use @signalapp. It's free, works on all platforms, and the cryptography has withstood a decade of scrutiny from academics and nation-states alike.
Elon Musk@elonmusk

Send files via 𝕏 Chat with full encryption. Much more secure than email!

English
183
352
3.7K
1.4M
Braxton retweetet
Curiosity
Curiosity@CuriosityonX·
It took 9 years and 3 billion miles to get this shot. Pluto’s icy Mountains.
English
2.7K
24.2K
178.2K
18.3M
Braxton retweetet
FREQUENCY
FREQUENCY@frequency_xyz·
The penguins took over the timeline. Now their founder’s on the mic. @LucaNetz of @pudgypenguin joined us at Frequency House to talk community. Eyes open for the full drop on its way soon.
English
1
3
4
931
Braxton retweetet
Web3 Philosopher
Web3 Philosopher@seunlanlege·
Polkadot just pulled off what is the most insane cross-chain application yet. Cross-chain chain state migration. An application that migrates the state of one chain (Polkadot Relay), accounts, code balances etc to another chain (Polkadot Hub) Truly historical feat
Parity Technologies@paritytech

AHM UPDATE: Account migration complete. 1.6 billion DOT migrated from 1.5 million accounts. ➡️Items processed: 1,512,216 ➡️Failed: 0 migration.paritytech.io

English
15
47
349
17K