Nexist Xenda'ths ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ

25.5K posts

Nexist Xenda'ths ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ banner
Nexist Xenda'ths ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ

Nexist Xenda'ths ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ

@dar205

Thelemite, Traditionalist, Radical Aristocrat, Anarch, Autarch, Panentheist. Modern society works fervently to put vulgarity within the reach of everyone-Dรกvila

Roseburg, Oregon, USA Beigetreten Mart 2008
162 Folgt241 Follower
Nexist Xenda'ths ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ retweetet
รlmos
รlmos@ThaddeusPapistยท
รlmos tweet media
ZXX
1
13
84
2.8K
John Michael Greer
John Michael Greer@JMGreerWriterยท
One of the greatest failures of contemporary mainstream spirituality is its insistence that what's spiritual must be nice and kind and loving and pretty. That's not even remotely true, of course, and one of the reasons I enjoyed writing my tentacle novels so much is that they gave me a convenient fictional framing to talk about how there's no contradiction between the terrifying otherness of the Divine and the possibility of constructive relationships between gods and human beings. Real gods and goddesses are crap-your-pants frightening; so are angels -- that's why the first thing angels generally say when they appear to people in the various scriptural passages is "Be not afraid." If what appears to you is cute and harmless, it's not divine, it's an astral toy you've created for yourself as a substitute for the Divine.
English
11
24
168
4.2K
Nexist Xenda'ths ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ retweetet
Being Libertarian
Being Libertarian@beinlibertarianยท
๐ŸคŒ
Being Libertarian tweet media
QME
41
212
2.4K
31.4K
Nexist Xenda'ths ๐Ÿ‡บ๐Ÿ‡ธ ๐Ÿ‡น๐Ÿ‡ผ ๐Ÿ‡ญ๐Ÿ‡ฐ retweetet
Alexander Raynor
Alexander Raynor@alex_raynor1968ยท
Locchi on Romualdi In this thought-provoking essay, Giorgio Locchi explores the essence of fascism through a philosophical and historical lens, engaging deeply with the ideas of Adriano Romualdi1 and Friedrich Nietzsche. Locchi argues that fascism is not merely a political movement but an expression of a broader superhumanist worldviewโ€”one rooted in a unique understanding of historical time. Read it here: nouvelledroite.substack.com/p/locchi-on-roโ€ฆ
Alexander Raynor tweet media
English
0
3
9
174
Erik Voorhees
Erik Voorhees@ErikVoorheesยท
The world doesnโ€™t realize this yet but AI will finally make philosophy a highly marketable skill
English
269
451
4.3K
216.5K
George Alexopoulos
George Alexopoulos@GPrime85ยท
Indeed, moderates like me only vote Republican because we dislike Democrats way more. Call us "disloyal" if you wish (personally I believe most GOP reps are two-faced, compromised traitors who are only loyal to Satan) but remember that moderates represent millions of votes. Piss enough of us off and we'll be happy to vote third party or not at all.
The President of all the Gays@cyre2067

@GPrime85 Or "You've expressed criticism of Dear Leader, THAT MAKES YOU A LIBTARD! HAR HAR HAR!" ...no, actually like many of Trump's voters, I'm a moderate republican that leans toward liberty and small govt, but feel free to keep alienating people like me as the midterms approach.

English
29
26
365
10.1K
owen cyclops
owen cyclops@owenbroadcastยท
1 out of 3 kids has a CPS investigation at some point, in the united states. but, check this out: only 1 in 8 experience confirmed maltreatment. so if 33% of kids come under CPS at some point, but only 12.5% have confirmed maltreatment, thats another way of saying that the other chunk, 20.5% come under CPS investigation without any maltreatment being found. so, by normal standard statistics, over 20% of kids in the US (one out of five) have a CPS investigation where no wrongdoing is actually found. so, did you know that you live (if youre american) in a country where one fifth of kids get a CPS investigation where no issue is ultimately found? thatโ€™s crazy. this means that one fifth of kids in the US have their family lives - what word do you want to use here? rustled? disturbed? itโ€™s at least a scary thing obviously - letโ€™s say โ€œshakenโ€ by a CPS investigation where nothing is ultimately found to have happened. now, letโ€™s keep going: each of those kids has parents. letโ€™s say those parents are embarrassed, or asocial - whatโ€™s the lowest number of people (specifically: friends that are parents) that they would mention this to? three? that seems like the lowest possible estimate. now, weโ€™re losing track of the math, because these numbers will start to overlap - but it doesnโ€™t really matter. so 20% of kids get one of these unsubstantiated investigations - that means you have a massive number of parents who are directly aware of someone who has their life disrupted in this way. and then, if even one of those friends tells one other parenting friend, youโ€™re actually easily in a situation where most (โ€œmostโ€ only means over 50%) active parents in america are zero to two degrees away from one of these investigations. but, people donโ€™t really openly talk about them. no one is advertising that this happened to them for obvious reasons, and most people arenโ€™t publicly sharing โ€œthis happened to my friendโ€ stories. so, itโ€™s almost a secret or concealed form of knowledge that couldnโ€™t be designed better to spread covertly among active parents without being known about by the population at large. so, whatโ€™s the point? my point is: this is a huge unspoken factor in parents general wariness to let their kids do things that are generally considered unsafe or even potentially risky. if you take these percentages, if you have six parents sitting around, and someone starts saying: โ€œi donโ€™t see why you donโ€™t just let your kid [go to the store alone, ride their bike alone, things like that]โ€ - odds are one of the parents sitting there either already had a CPS investigation or knows someone that did - but they arenโ€™t going to say this out loud. so everyone just says, โ€œhaha - yeahโ€, and moves on. what is called โ€œhelicopter parentingโ€ presumably has some root in millennial neuroses that is unrelated to this. however, this is a big part of what itโ€™s plugged in to that gives it a huge amount of its juice. one in three kids come into contact with CPS at some point. how much is this actually shaping our culture? if you randomly selected ten american kids, odds are that one or two of them will get an unsubstantiated CPS investigation at some point in their life? how can that be real? thoughts for the mind.
owen cyclops tweet media
English
94
136
1.3K
68.7K