Rick Deckard

@KatieM12121 @BBCBreakfast No, they never asked because they wouldn't like the answer. So they'll do it anyway.

@BBCBreakfast We are joining a list of frankly fairly shady authoritarian countries. Is this really what the British people want? Have we ever even been asked?

'We will make further statements in July about VPNs and further restrictions' Technology Secretary Liz Kendall told #BBCBreakfast she will outline more details next month about the social media ban on under 16s in the UK - as well as additional restrictions on Virtual Private Networks, curfews and chatbots bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

@roboticpressure @BBCBreakfast You should delete this comment and go and educate yourself, using Tim Berners-Lee's world wide web.

@BBCBreakfast Your country has contributed exactly 0 to technology, and you want to regulate it?

@BBCBreakfast And yet this piece of work voted to jab kids. Voted in favour of 'certificate of vaccination Id' (COVID) passes. Voted against a national statutory inquiry about the grooming gangs. She doesn't care about kids. Heinous.

@BBCBreakfast She's not qualified in any way shape or form to restrict anything. Neither are the rest of the idiots in parliament. These dangerous fools need to go. Now.

@SciTechgovuk @BarnetCouncil @CamdenCouncil @DorsetCouncilUK Oh, joy. What can possibly go wrong.

New AI tool aims to slash planning decision times by half to help our push to build 1.5 million homes 🏠 This will help accelerate routine planning applications – now being tested in @BarnetCouncil, @CamdenCouncil and @DorsetCouncilUK.

Did anyone else have to login to X again just now?

@FringeViews @RogueKite Yes the seed was the iPhone. But if they already know everything about us, why do *they* need digital Id? Why the massive push for it? Why should we empower them further. As for criminal networks, they'll adapt and continue either way, until they threaten the control grid.

@dmw157 @RogueKite I know. But everyone missed their chance to stop it when they made excuse after excuse as to why they needed to own and pay for a smartphone. So, since you're all dragging me into the tech nightmare world, I'd like it to include digital ID so that criminals will think twice.

I really do think people should contemplate why our media wants you getting worked up regarding this subject. The level of detail they could access on us has been known for years. Snowden revealed this decades ago. Obviously the trails and tech have only become more invasive and sophisticated. Is the point to make people think they have anonymity now?

@FringeViews @RogueKite Digital Id, which this will become, will negatively affect everyone when they implement access control to society with it.

@RogueKite I honestly believe it's the criminal networks which proliferate on the net who are behind this massive psychological push to be paranoid about online ID. They're the only ones that it would truly negatively impact.

@RogueKite Not relevant when their goal is digital Id. They may know everything about us, but they do not have the infrastructure to require digital ID checks at the point of access. For that, they need public approval. They to get that approval by saying it protects kids. It's bullshit.

@benonwine No I want them returned to their country of origin, after which I do not want another penny spent on them.

@Heater44444 @1776General_ 🤣👏

@1776General_ Old news. It’s already hanging in the Louvre.

A New York woman is going viral after being repeatedly harassed by a group of black women on the subway, only to drop the N-word on them as the subway doors closed.

@nowayjomo @emilyhewertson @lorraine_teuten Sigh. There it is again. Yet another Labour supporter hurling the worn out 'racist' moniker. Thanks to people like you actual racism will make an unwelcome return. How long will this government enquiry last? Years Decades? That 'my dear' is bollocks.

@dmw157 @emilyhewertson @lorraine_teuten Unsubstantiated is bollocks dear. Wait for the government inquiry instead of a crown funded one by a racist with an axe to grind.

Rupert Lowe promised a Rape Gang Inquiry Report, for every young girl betrayed by decades of state failure. Today, he delivered exactly that; a 200-page dossier exposing the darkest scandal in modern Britain. All while donating his parliamentary salary to charity every month. Whatever your politics, you have to respect that. Rupert Lowe deserves a peerage.

@nowayjomo @emilyhewertson @lorraine_teuten So if it's not 250k what is then? 0? 100? 1000? 10000? 100000? How many is too many before people like you start getting a bit worked up? Yet here you are posting this unsubstantiated shit from 'official bodies', and just conclude it's all bollocks.

@emilyhewertson @lorraine_teuten Load of bollocks

@TheMeenaShmeena @nowayjomo @Georgehstqx @emilyhewertson @lorraine_teuten *In their opinion. Which is pretty obviously going to be their opinion, since they're on hook.

@nowayjomo @Georgehstqx @emilyhewertson @lorraine_teuten “The report is widely viewed as politically partisan. It frames the issue almost exclusively through the lens of immigration and race rather than broader institutional failures. The recommendations heavily reflect the ideological manifesto of Lowe's political party”

Everything about this clip is brilliant.

@DuncanMcFarlan @elonmusk So you've read all 219 pages and you've concluded that it's all bollocks. Can you cite specific parts that are 'bollocks'? Then you engage in whataboutery as if we should just turn a blind eye to it? It is the contents of (or lack of) your cranium that is bollocks pal.

@elonmusk Made up bollocks. Sarah Champion MP already admitted she had no basis for her 100k claim. Many grooming gangs and 85% of paedophile ring members are white. Victims include non-white children and teenagers.

Those who knew must go to prison for a long time

@jamzefish @statsjamie And the how is what people are interested in. If the how is digital Id you'll find it's very unpopular, hence my previous post.

@dmw157 @statsjamie A manifesto is high-level what, not how. You are assuming digital ID will be used for age verification.

🚨 Only 1 in 6 parents put a social media ban first. More preferred targeted limits on risky features or curfews. Yet Starmer is going all in anyway. Another big Government policy they never clearly put in the manifesto. And here’s the obvious question 👇 How do you ban under-16s from social media without forcing adults into age checks, facial scans or digital ID? Child safety — or digital ID by the back door? 🔐

@jamzefish @statsjamie Sure, they'll use credit cards/passports/driver's licences first. Then people without those will not be able to confirm it so they'll shift to biometrics via the government's One Login. So yes, it will be digital Id.

@MaxiMumMother @statsjamie Exactly.

All UK Adults and all visitors to the UK will still be “allowed” (that is the word used in the fine print) to use the platforms… Only once they have: Handed over facial recognition, digital ID, passport, or credit card details to prove they’re not a child. (No details on how this data is secured or protected from misuse or hacking, who is storing it, where, who has access) Step 1: Link your real identity to your location via IP and your speech. Step 2: Police have a lovely searchable database of all data and locations of every UK adult, and what they read, write, view. Every spicy take, meme, cartoon, comment, or political analysis. Step 3: bring in the consequences - arrests, travel ban, debanking, for out-of-bounds speech. This is fascism. The only country that does this is North Korea. Even China doesn't have this level of authoritarian control of it's populace.

@PaffyPete @statsjamie Where? If you're talking about X then no, it hasn't. Even if it had that's very different to a government mandated digital Id.

@statsjamie We’ve had age verification here for 2 years. Did you whinge when it was introduced?