@Polymarket How would online ivermectin sellers make money? 😭 They need another pandemic to sell ivermectin.
English
Dr Sam
213 posts
Dr Sam
@dr_sam_0
Biomedical Scientists | Agnostic | Science | Exploring Faith
Beigetreten Mart 2021
87 Folgt41 Follower
JUST IN: WHO chief assures hantavirus outbreak “is not COVID”
English
@EriqueMonnie @KR3Wmatic @maklelan I don’t think you understand the argument I’m making. “They are one” is not found in the original version. The KJV got it wrong. This is wildly accepted by most bible scholars. Just google “Comma Johanneum” to read more about it.
English
@dr_sam_0 @KR3Wmatic @maklelan The verse just said they are one, so what’s your argument? The bible explain itself better than the quran that needs Hadith.
English
@athiestboi I’m an agnostic but I’ve got to admit, most critical scholars agree that Jesus existed. The gospels may not accurately represent what he did but he definitely existed.
English
Is there any evidence that the individual Jesus ever existed?
English
I’ll do you one better, the highest form of intelligence would be proving Jesus is Lord. Too bad nobody has done that yet.
YoungHoon Kim@yhbryankimiq
THE HIGHEST FORM OF INTELLIGENCE IS RECOGNIZING THAT JESUS CHRIST IS LORD. 100%
English
1 John 5:7 in the KJV (“these three are one”), that’s the famous “Comma Johanneum”. It was added later by a scribe. It’s not part of the original text. As for the other verse, simply mentioning the Father, Son, and Holy Spirit does not mean they are co-equal, co-eternal, consubstantial persons sharing one divine essence.
English
@dr_sam_0 @KR3Wmatic @maklelan Matthew 28:19 (KJV)
"Go ye therefore, and teach all nations, baptizing them in the name of the Father, and of the Son, and of the Holy Ghost:"
• 1 John 5:7 (KJV):
"For there are three that bear record in heaven, the Father, the Word, and the Holy Ghost: and these three are one.
English
@DrNeilStone I think the mainstream media is partly complicit in causing this hysteria. They’re giving conspiracy theorists all the materials they need to cause panic.
English
All those people saying about Hantavirus that you "WILL NOT COMPLY"
Relax
There's nothing to comply with
English
@MaryBowdenMD @ApuAkkad1 This is bottom-tier logic. People will try anything in life or death situations, but that doesn't excuse spreading misinformation or grifting your followers, especially for a disease that isn't even a current public threat.
English
@ApuAkkad1 So if you were dying of hantavirus, would you wait for a clinical trial to prove ivermectin works or just try it?
English
It’s crazy that instead of doing trials to prove something works, these people instead say no trials prove it does not work. Burden of proof is on the person making the claim.
Mary Talley Bowden MD@MaryBowdenMD
No one has done a study to show ivermectin doesn’t work for hantavirus. Ivermectin has multiple anti-inflammatory and anti-viral properties, and if I had hantavirus, I would try it!
English
@ApoloJedi_ The "blind forces" didn't plan it; the lineages that used it simply outlived the ones that didn't.
English
How do evolutionists overcome the monumental problem of their belief that blind purposeless forces produced sexual reproduction?
Is Genesis History?@isgenhistory
{Can survival of the fittest fully explain love, attraction, and family?} {Is sexual reproduction evidence of chance or design?} "Why Sex is the Best Argument For Creation and Against Evolution", written by the producer of Is Genesis History, shows why the complexity and interdependence of sexual reproduction may point more convincingly to creation than evolution. Click below to check it out! isgenesishistory.com/why-sex-is-the…
English
Where do I even start?
This is what we call an “ All or Nothing Fallacy”. it relies on a misunderstanding of how biological traits actually develop. Evolution doesn't start with "vision"; it starts with light sensitivity. A single light-sensitive protein (opsin) allows a microbe to move toward food or away from UV rays.
Also, Opsins didn't appear out of thin air. They evolved from G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which cells already used to sense chemicals and hormones. Evolution "co-opted" an existing signaling system and tweaked it to respond to light.
The claim that “fully formed eyes suddenly appear” is also false. Fossils show gradual increases in eye complexity, especially in arthropods and mollusks.
Divinely Designed@DivinelyDesined
Vision is an absolute marvel of Divine Engineering. It requires a minimum of 3 systems working together from the start, or we don't see. 1. Eyes to capture light & convert into signals 2. Pathways to transport the signal 3. A brain to process it Evolution can't build it one step at a time, because there is no vision until all those systems exist and function together. Compounding the complexity further, each of those 3 systems themselves require a minimum number of more complex subsystems to function properly. For instance, all eyes require opsin proteins. Opsin is a highly complex protein that holds a special light-sensitive molecule called retinal; when a single photon hits the retinal, it instantly flips shape, triggering the opsin to change its 3D shape and trigger a precise cascade which converts the light into an electrical signal to be sent to the brain where it can be understood as vision. Opsin alone, is useless. It needs the retinal molecule plus the full cascade, or it does nothing. This is the case with ALL vision systems, confirmed over and over again the lab. No partially formed system produces any vision, or any other function for that matter. Many uninformed Evolutionists attempt to argue that we see different levels of complexity in vision systems, which they say is evidence that vision evolved gradually from simpler systems. But the evolutionary scientists themselves refute this. Even the very simplest possible system of vision - the infamous "light sensitive cell" - still relies on a similar highly complex, interconnected network of proteins and other molecules. Mainstream evolutionary science even teaches that vision systems evolved independently, from scratch, at least 40 different times. The reason is because many vision systems are so different, operating with such unique parts, that one simply could not have evolved from another. The fossil record itself refutes the concept of step by step construction of vision systems. Complex eyes appear early in the fossil record, fully formed & functional. There is no increasing complexity in the fossil record - it's a complete contradiction of evolutionary predictions. The vision system has all the Hallmark evidence of design. A complex, interconnected web of information processing systems with incomprehensibly precise timing & coordination between them all to produce a highly specialized function. Nature does not, and cannot, produce such a system, not with all the time and resources in the entire universe. Everything you see is a testament to the Power of our Creator.
English
Where do I even start?
This is what we call an “ All or Nothing Fallacy”. it relies on a misunderstanding of how biological traits actually develop. Evolution doesn't start with "vision"; it starts with light sensitivity. A single light-sensitive protein (opsin) allows a microbe to move toward food or away from UV rays.
Also, Opsins didn't appear out of thin air. They evolved from G-protein-coupled receptors (GPCRs), which cells already used to sense chemicals and hormones. Evolution "co-opted" an existing signaling system and tweaked it to respond to light.
The claim that “fully formed eyes suddenly appear” is also false. Fossils show gradual increases in eye complexity, especially in arthropods and mollusks.
English
Vision is an absolute marvel of Divine Engineering.
It requires a minimum of 3 systems working together from the start, or we don't see.
1. Eyes to capture light & convert into signals
2. Pathways to transport the signal
3. A brain to process it
Evolution can't build it one step at a time, because there is no vision until all those systems exist and function together.
Compounding the complexity further, each of those 3 systems themselves require a minimum number of more complex subsystems to function properly.
For instance, all eyes require opsin proteins.
Opsin is a highly complex protein that holds a special light-sensitive molecule called retinal; when a single photon hits the retinal, it instantly flips shape, triggering the opsin to change its 3D shape and trigger a precise cascade which converts the light into an electrical signal to be sent to the brain where it can be understood as vision.
Opsin alone, is useless. It needs the retinal molecule plus the full cascade, or it does nothing.
This is the case with ALL vision systems, confirmed over and over again the lab.
No partially formed system produces any vision, or any other function for that matter.
Many uninformed Evolutionists attempt to argue that we see different levels of complexity in vision systems, which they say is evidence that vision evolved gradually from simpler systems.
But the evolutionary scientists themselves refute this.
Even the very simplest possible system of vision - the infamous "light sensitive cell" - still relies on a similar highly complex, interconnected network of proteins and other molecules.
Mainstream evolutionary science even teaches that vision systems evolved independently, from scratch, at least 40 different times.
The reason is because many vision systems are so different, operating with such unique parts, that one simply could not have evolved from another.
The fossil record itself refutes the concept of step by step construction of vision systems.
Complex eyes appear early in the fossil record, fully formed & functional.
There is no increasing complexity in the fossil record - it's a complete contradiction of evolutionary predictions.
The vision system has all the Hallmark evidence of design.
A complex, interconnected web of information processing systems with incomprehensibly precise timing & coordination between them all to produce a highly specialized function.
Nature does not, and cannot, produce such a system, not with all the time and resources in the entire universe.
Everything you see is a testament to the Power of our Creator.
English
@iluminatibot It’s just you bro. I took the vaccine and my immune system is just as good. This applies to the billions of people on this planet.
English
"Is it just me or are people dropping like flies ever since 2020?"
"It's almost as if something has happened to their immune systems."
English
@DrFrankTurek Yes, Flood myths, divine sons, apocalyptic saviors, resurrections. Most of these themes existed long before Christianity. The difference is Christians mock every other mythology and turn around and say their version is “historical fact.”.
English
No worldwide flood layer.
No interruption in ice cores or tree rings.
Ancient civilizations continued without disruption
Millions of species couldn’t fit or survive on one wooden boat
Animal migration after the flood makes no sense biologically or geographically
No evidence of a human/genetic bottleneck from only 8 people.
English
COVID conspiracy Twitter really turned some of y’all into quack virologists. Hantavirus has been studied for decades and there’s still no universally proven antiviral cure, but somehow you cracked it with ivermectin and vitamins.
Joe Tippens@JoeTippen
Good news... THE HANTAVIRUS is a SINGLE STRAND RNA VIRUS. Other Single Strand RNA viruses: - Sars-Cov2 (COVID-19) - RSV - Marburg - Ebola Therefore, we already know the cure. A Zinc Ionophore combined with Zinc. 👉HCQ 👉IVERMECTIN 👉QUERCETIN + VITAMIN C Thank you Dr. Zelenko RIP 🙏
English
Dr Sam retweetet
Almost any time someone mentions the word toxins, you can assume they’re not being factual.
Everything can be toxic, including oxygen, water, sodium, glucose, and many other things essential to life.
Thankfully, even scary-sounding things that can be toxic—like arsenic, formaldehyde, and even heavy metals—are also usually nontoxic in the small amounts in which they’re encountered in our diets and everyday life.
The rare exceptions prove the rule that there’s really no such thing as detoxing.
Your liver and kidneys are the best detox agents you have, and if those aren’t working, then you should seek medical attention.
- @RyanMarino
isksmsn@isksmsn156068
@jonathanstea You think toxins are a conspiracy?
English
@KR3Wmatic Both religions make similar but contradictory claims. They both can’t be right, though they could both be wrong. That said, I’m more sympathetic to Christianity. I think Islam too violent.
English
Dr Sam retweetet
Fauci testified using the NIH’s technical definition of gain-of-function at the time. Critics use a broader definition. That is a scientific and regulatory dispute — not automatic proof of lying.
Rand Paul has been predicting Fauci prosecutions for years. If there were clear evidence of criminal perjury, charges likely would have happened already.
This is the problem when Rand Paul doesn’t care about science but headlines
Dr. Drew@drdrew
"Fauci testified under oath that the NIH has never funded gain-of-function research. That's a lie," says Dr. @ScottAtlas_IT, who served alongside Dr. Fauci on the White House Coronavirus Task Force in 2020. @RandPaul warns there are less than 3 days left to indict Dr. Fauci.
English