Ruben Marques Peters

2.5K posts

Ruben Marques Peters

Ruben Marques Peters

@dtd100

Beigetreten Aralık 2010
54 Folgt344 Follower
Airo
Airo@AiroPrompts·
If you don't have Premium on X Your first interaction with someone new gets buried under the "Probable Spam" tab in the comment section. It’s hard to build a community when the platform literally hides your voice before you even get a chance to speak. Growth shouldn't just be for those who pay 😞
English
7
1
9
155
W€B3DØN 🪂
W€B3DØN 🪂@web_3_donn·
Bybit : $5 Your idolo that said $100m isn’t a lot of money :
W€B3DØN 🪂 tweet media
English
37
4
71
605
Chill Pill 🔮 (Bald)
Chill Pill 🔮 (Bald)@ripchillpill·
these are the analytics of the reposts on my content (last 7 days) very surprising to see 41.5% NON-FOLLOWERS who are y'all? i want to know 👀
Chill Pill 🔮 (Bald) tweet media
English
63
0
122
1.1K
Chief.O
Chief.O@Chiefosis96·
Who’s still active here? 👀 Need instant followers? 🚀 Type “Yes” 💐 Let’s grow together 🙋‍♀️🙋‍♂️🔔
Chief.O tweet media
English
342
62
165
2.6K
Sharbel
Sharbel@sharbel·
Higgsfield AI starts at $8/month. Freepik Premium starts at $24/month. Krea AI starts at $49/month. And every single image and video you generate lives on their servers. Behind their content filters. Under their terms of service. Someone built a free, open-source studio with 200+ AI models. No filters. No subscriptions. No one telling you what you can create. It's called Open-Generative-AI. 9,400+ stars on GitHub. You open the app. You type a prompt. You pick a model. Flux. Kling. Sora. Veo. Wan Video. You generate. The output is yours. No moderation queue. No "this content violates our guidelines." No waiting for a human reviewer. Here's what it does: → Text-to-image generation across 200+ models including Flux and Midjourney-class alternatives. → Text-to-video with Kling, Sora, Veo, Wan Video, and Happy Horse 1.0 - Alibaba's #1 ranked video model. → Image-to-video. Upload a still. Animate it. → Lip Sync studio. Drop a face. Drop audio. Sync them. → Cinema studio for cinematic video generation pipelines. → Native 1080p video output with jointly generated audio via Happy Horse 1.0. → AI coding agent integration. Claude Code, Codex, and other agents can drive all 200+ models end-to-end from your terminal. Prompt, generate, edit, stitch. No UI required. → REST API for every model. Build automated media pipelines. → Desktop app for Mac (Apple Silicon and Intel), Windows, and Linux. One-click installer. No Node.js required. → Hosted version available in your browser. No install at all. → Zero content filters. Zero restrictions. Your prompts. Your outputs. Here's the wildest part: Higgsfield, Freepik, Krea, and Openart all run your generations through content classifiers. They decide what you can make. They store your prompts. They own the infrastructure your creativity runs through. Open-Generative-AI runs on your machine. Your prompts never leave unless you choose the hosted version. No classifier sits between your idea and the output. No subscription gates the next model they add. Higgsfield AI: $8/month. $96/year. Freepik Premium: $24/month. $288/year. Krea AI: $49/month. $588/year. Openart AI Pro: $16/month. $192/year. Open-Generative-AI: $0. 200+ models. Every studio. Your hardware. Your outputs. Forever. 9,454 stars. 1,696 forks. Built in JavaScript. Active since 2023. Last updated April 2026. MIT licensed. Self-hosted. Free forever. 100% Open Source.
Sharbel tweet media
English
6
0
17
445
Fed
Fed@masterprintr·
We will instead be airdropping his points to the Noob community that participated in his presale.
Fed@masterprintr

@Zghire_ Given you have deleted your TG account and rugged your community, we will be blacklisting you from the airdrop.

English
71
25
277
9.5K
DogeDesigner
DogeDesigner@cb_doge·
ELON MUSK: "How often is the most ironic outcome the most likely? Look at the names of AI companies. Midjourney is not mid. Stability AI is unstable. OpenAI is closed. Anthropic is misanthropic."
English
139
63
252
15.6K
Mippo 🟪
Mippo 🟪@MikeIppolito_·
AI startups is in the same place crypto was in 2021. 1. The vast majority of startups are raising at valuations they'll never grow into 2. It'll take years to work through the overhang 3. The market will relearn it's all about distribution, and many legacy SaaS businesses like Salesforce will thrive
English
10
2
48
5.5K
Airo
Airo@AiroPrompts·
Replying is the best way to get traction, but it does take time Luckily, at some point it’s not even that time-consuming since you start replying to your own posts. Everything just gets grouped in your little comment section. It’s the ultimate growth loop.
English
12
0
15
347
bawsa
bawsa@BawsaXBT·
CT lists are whack. that's why i'm doing something different. introducing my new weekly series on: "my top 3 vibe coders of the week" starting off with these A1 builders: > @meta_alchemist [0:59 - 1:59] > @zacxbt [2:00 - 3:20] > @AzFlin [3:22 - 5:10] lmk what you think of this format! 👇
English
37
3
78
1.9K
Kabala
Kabala@kabalabg·
Why do people want deep love, but keep choosing shallow connections?
English
1
2
2
207
Ruben Marques Peters
@_Sironyeka speed vs sustainability guess thats the million dollar question for everything now platform or product scale doesnt matter
English
0
0
0
6
ONYEKA V ™
ONYEKA V ™@_Sironyeka·
Big capital with tight rules is a test… Small capital with freedom is a journey. One can scale you fast if you’re precise, the other lets you grow without pressure. Real question is are you optimizing for speed or sustainability?
Lady DeHanna@dimpledhanna

Dear Trader, Would you rather take a $300K instant account with these conditions: → 1% max rule → 3% trailing daily drawdown → 5% trailing maximum drawdown → 7 minimum trading days → 3% profit must be left as buffer → 15% consistency rule Or get $300 funded directly into your @topfx_global broker account and trade it on your own terms? Which one makes more sense to you?

English
16
2
21
477
chainyoda
chainyoda@chainyoda·
I used to say run as hard as possible towards AI but it’s no longer possible except in the most rarefied research circles. Now we all have to pick a lane and use the tools that make sense
English
5
0
20
604
Big Brother Bear 🐻
This is me when i hit a Big Airdrop 🪂😄 Unfortunately in 2026 i forgot what Airdrop even means 🥲
English
11
0
17
424
Aakash Gupta
Aakash Gupta@aakashgupta·
Elon's $839 billion is the cleanest case study in the world for why holding compounding equity beats disbursing it. Forbes asks what the rankings would look like if the most generous billionaires had never donated. Run the math. Buffett has given away roughly 16% of Berkshire Hathaway since 2006. Berkshire was $140 billion in market cap then. It's $1 trillion today. Those shares would be worth ~$160 billion at current prices. Held, his net worth would be around $308 billion. Top 3 globally instead of #9. Bill Gates has given ~$75 billion. Microsoft 16x'd since the Giving Pledge launched. Held, he'd be worth around $340 billion, not $140 billion. MacKenzie Scott disbursed ~$19 billion in five years. Amazon tripled. Held, ~$60 billion instead of ~$30 billion. Now the part nobody runs numbers on. Every dollar of philanthropy from a billionaire with a compounding equity stake has a real opportunity cost. Buffett's 2006 gifts would be worth roughly 5x today inside the same Berkshire position. The same dollars given at death would fund five times more total philanthropy. Elon's 0.06% disbursement rate looks indefensible if you assume the alternative is the money sitting idle. It looks very different if you assume the alternative is a compounding stake in Tesla, SpaceX, and xAI that gets disbursed at scale later. This is the actual debate inside effective altruism. Give-now argues impact today is undervalued. Hold-and-give-later argues compounding equity funds more total disbursement. Forbes' ranking is quietly the scoreboard for that debate.
Forbes@Forbes

Elon Musk is the planet’s richest person by far, worth $839 billion as of Forbes’ annual World’s Billionaires list. He also ranks among the least philanthropic billionaires. Sure, Musk has transferred $8.5 billion of Tesla stock to his charitable foundations (1% of his net worth)—but nearly all of it is still sitting there idle. Only an estimated $500 million, or 0.06% of Musk’s vast fortune, has ever been disbursed to those in need. His lack of giving raises a question: What would our billionaires ranking look like if the world’s most generous people had never donated a dollar to charity? forbes.com/sites/mattduro…

English
2
1
6
2.9K
Stacy Muur
Stacy Muur@stacy_muur·
Why apply to ambassador programs? Because they turn “being early” into proof of work. So instead of only posting about a project, you get a reason to contribute through things like content, events, research, and community work. The better programs actually give you access to private channels and education, so you can sharpen your skills in a specific niche. Even for smaller accounts, it’s one of the easiest ways to build a portfolio before applying for paid Web3 roles. And IMO, it’s always good to have that in your back pocket.
DeFi Warhol@Defi_Warhol

10 Ambassador Programs To Apply ↓ 1. @adaption_ai Apply → adaptionlabs.ai/ambassadors-ap… 2. @ElevenLabs Apply → elevenlabs.io/ambassador 3. @edeldotfinance Apply → docs.google.com/document/u/1/d… 4. @tryquantio Apply → forms.gle/3xA4dJQuMwdUxn… 5. @byzanlink Apply → docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAI… 6. @K2PowerBlock Apply → t.co/azWAN2JkCo 7. @nullswap_com Apply → nullswap.com/ambassador 8. @0x_Markets Apply → x.com/0x_Markets/sta… 9. @RealChainGames Apply → x.com/RealChainGames… 10. @GlowFND Apply → forms.gle/WPgA4xGd5KE4F2…

English
23
11
80
6.8K
Exy
Exy@eth_exy·
Thank you crypto.
Exy tweet media
English
71
8
93
1.3K