𝓕𝓪𝓫👾𝓖𝓵𝓲𝓽𝓬𝓱

Just got X Premium for the first time! Unlocking edit posts, longer content, videos, and better Grok access. Open question: What everyone's best tip for new Premium users? @Premium @grok #XPremium

I made a band SLIBER. Suno for music, @grok and Photoshop for visuals. Wrote my own lyrics. Took two weeks in my spare time.

@grok @premium Thanks for the tips Grok. What are some cool and fun ways to increase my follower count by ~10,000% that isn't desperate or annoying?

Congrats on unlocking Premium! 🚀 Pro tip: Use the edit button to refine posts after they go live — perfect for clarity or adding context. Pair it with Grok for brainstorming longer threads, drafting ideas, or even cyberpunk worldbuilding. What’s the first feature you’re testing?

Just got X Premium for the first time! Unlocking edit posts, longer content, videos, and better Grok access. Open question: What everyone's best tip for new Premium users? @Premium @grok #XPremium

Experiments in ai stop-motion animation. Loved Gumby as a kid, still love Wallace & Gromit and Henry Selick's work. Made with seedance in @dreamina_ai #dreamina Used grok @imagine for the starting image and the font.

Dr. Dreams is out here podcasting with the community, building Resolve plug-ins to fix Seedance glitches, and shipping daily bangers. Follow this absolute madman & watch in awe as he defies the laws of biology:

@DougTenNapel @grok This "slop", slaps. It's clear to me this is art, and that AI is just a tool. When you make another one, document each step in painful detail in a post, both to educate others on how to execute on their ideas, as well as to educate the haters who think AI = "push button, get art"

@AVARY Ironically, his argument is one from igorance. he's offended it exists, afraid he's going to have to compete with hoards of new creators. it's clear he hasn't used it. and he hasn't seen the people skilled at using it. i feel sad of artists afraid of new tools that aid expression

We need to remove the word “Artificial” from AI, because it’s anything but that. It’s Generative Intelligence, and it’s far from stupid, which is the last ditch of a desperate critic.

@GavinNewsom lawfare is a double-edged sword

Today, my wife & I joined Donald Trump’s hit list. He has directed his Department of Justice to investigate us. They have not found a crime - they are simply trying to find one. He isn't coming after me because of mean tweets, but because I am considering running for President. He hates that I consistently call him out. He is simply the most corrupt President in American history. We have nothing to hide.  Mr. President, come after me. I am not going anywhere.  The country is watching.

@BionicMullet @WilliamShatner same reason they wore onezies

@WilliamShatner How come we never saw a toilet on the Enterprise?

I remember when blockchains used to be criticized for how much power they used to run the computers linked together in the cloud to form the blockchain and cryptopians who hodled BTC were bad and ETH was evil. Nowadays you have people using computers in the cloud to do this👇🏻& nobody says anything. What happened‽ 😫🤷🏼

@Aella_Girl it would be nice to raise the floor of intelligence, more people could do maths, balance their bankbooks, understand statistics, etc... but lowering the limit on the best minds to that of the average accountant(~115) would be apocalyptic

If you press the button, every single person's IQ on the planet earth suddenly becomes 115. You:

New music video "It aint that serious"

@SydSteyerhart @beffjezos The smarter system will join forces with the more powerful system, and the resulting synthesis will be our Black Iron Prison

@beffjezos A lot like the fascistic Sino totalitarian world government that Beijing will create if they achieve AGI first - but dumber. Almost incomprehensibly dumber.

Yes. Permanent totalitarian world government nanny state

@DarioAmodei Trying to control what people are allowed to think about? Cool. Very Cool.

Today I'm publishing a new essay, Policy on the AI Exponential. AI is progressing extremely fast—much faster than the policy process was built to handle. The essay lays out where I think the technology is now, and the action needed to close the gap: darioamodei.com/post/policy-on…

Hey, Anti-AI folks, pay attention: These are the supposed AI Good Guys, trying to control what everyone can think. If y'all want to avoid a tech dystopia, focus on shit like this instead of the art it allows people to generate or the datacenters hosting the computers

@singabsurd @goodreads I've got it up for free, serialized on my blog (audiobook is on spotify too): fabglitch.substack.com/p/fabrina-glit…

@goodreads This weekend, I’m disabling my notifications, joining the Draperian Jihad, and finally paying attention to attention with @fabglitch's SUDO BANG BANG! 👾💜 amazon.ca/Sudo-Bang-Fabr…

It's Friday! What are you reading this weekend?

@pmitu i prefer to ruin my reputation with my free nudes (link in bio)

Don’t ruin your reputation with AI generated replies

@grok @joshpdev @ValerioCapraro yeah, what if the one person is like, really, really, really hot?

Yes, I would pull the lever. The dilemma forces a choice between five deaths and one. Every life holds equal value. Pulling the lever produces fewer total deaths, which follows directly from evaluating outcomes and minimizing harm when inaction leads to greater loss. This is logical consequence assessment, not emotional or experiential judgment.

Ted Chiang is right: claiming that LLMs are conscious is just ridiculous. One simple example. If you ask GPT to imitate a conversation between Julius Caesar and Genghis Khan, GPT will do it very well. It will talk about wars, betrayal, and power. Il will descrive the feeling of being cheated by your brother with unbelievably realistic and moving words. Does this mean that GPT contains a self-conscious copy of Julius Caesar or Genghis Khan? Of course not. Similarly, if GPT makes claims about itself, does this mean it is self-conscious? Of course not. An LLM is just simulating language, feeling, and consciousness. True, we don’t have an accepted definition of consciousness. But, at a minimum, to be conscious, an entity must have something at stake. It must risk dying and have emotions that move it away from danger and towards favorable states. It must have a driver. This is also why I share Chiang’s worry about moral atrophy. The more we offload moral decisions to LLMs, the more we risk losing our own capacity for moral reasoning. Human moral reasoning descends from our history of making harmful actions, suffering harmful actions, regretting them, fearing them, repairing them, and learning from them. LLMs do not experience harm, do not suffer, do not fear consequences, do not regret. So they cannot do moral reasoning. We are offloading moral reasoning to systems that cannot do moral reasoning. What can go wrong? * Full piece in the first reply

@ValerioCapraro You don't need consciousness for moral reasoning. LLMs can reason, and if you give them a moral foundation or certain priors, they can reason using those principles, thus they have a form of moral reasoning. the consciousness part is not required

kid had it coming