Fake Poulter
42.6K posts

Fake Poulter
@fakePOULTER
Fabulous English Golfer who is hooked on Little House on the Prairie. This account is fake, as the name clearly indicates. I am not, Ian James Poulter.
Where am I? In a Ferrari. Beigetreten Mart 2013
2.5K Folgt4K Follower

@YesItsBS @EvilCoachFick Kill me if Wisconsin ever gets a coach like PJ
English

@EvilCoachFick Coach shows no emotion… meanwhile the little elf on the other side at least cares
English

The worst team in basketball so far. Last year was such a fart in the wind for the Pacers
Indiana Pacers@Pacers
final.
English

@ArmenSaryan It wasn’t a paid event. It was an athletic department function for sponsors of MU. The only person who got out of there faster than me was the AD Larry W….🤣🤣🤣
English

@fakePOULTER well usually with speaking engagements that is what tends to happen, in a way that's what they pay for, I don't think you're wrong, but Al and Rick and all those guys were the same
English

Buzz is really good at this. I'm not gonna be the guy to ask why he would leave for VA tech if it was a top 15 job. Others would ask that question and it's quite logical.
Big East Golden Eagle@BE_GoldenEagle
A brief clip of Buzz Williams on his time at Marquette. Calls #mubb a Top 15 job in the sport.
English

@DustyEvely Uhhhh, really? As evidenced by what? His big showings in the playoffs?
English

LaFleur has shown himself to be an extremely adaptive game planner, so I have faith in him making an adjustment.
james shoquist@jshoquist3
@DustyEvely Do you have faith they’ll make the adjustment?
English

@NFL Great job with the review assist @NFLOfficiating …. Clown college
English


crazy play that had zero creativity after calling a timeout and Jordan Love did everything he could to extend it buying time just for his pass catchers to get no separation.
FOX Sports: NFL@NFLonFOX
Crazy play on 4th and 8😬 📺:FOX
English

@LouStagner I’m
Glad I don’t have the pressure on having to be the arbiter on every topic in golf. Seems quite taxing.
English

Colt Knost getting his amateur status back is bad form.
From the USGA website:
"The Mid-Amateur, for amateur golfers of at least 25 years of age, provides a formal national championship for the post-college amateur, for whom the game is truly an avocation."
"for whom the game is truly an avocation".
Letting ex-pros, where golf WAS their vocation, play in the mid-am runs against the spirit of the event. Especially ex-pros that won many millions of dollars.
In the 2025 mid-am, six of the eight quarter-finalists were reinstated professionals. Years of high-level reps and tour-hardened skills don’t disappear because the prize checks stop.
Even if an ex-pro hasn’t played for money in years, the accumulated skill capital (elite and extensive practice reps, extensive tournament reps, elite coaching, etc...) persists.
Colt wrote:
"If a surgeon decided to take 7 years off and then come back to operate on you, would you feel as confident in that doc as one that did the procedure yesterday or the week before?"
This is the wrong question. His analogy asks, “Is the ex-pro as sharp as before?” The question should be, “Does the ex-pro still have a big edge over true amateurs?” Even if they’re a bit rusty, a former tour player’s baseline skills remain FAR above a career amateur.
And that baseline skill is there because golf was their vocation. Which is exactly the kind of player who the USGA says the mid-am is NOT for.
Also, skill decay does not equal skill deletion.
Motor-learning 101:
Highly trained skills are retained unusually well, and reacquisition of those skills is fast. Years of tour reps don’t evaporate. There is not much practice time needed to get dangerous again. That advantage is exactly what makes reinstatement unfair to career ams.
English




















