KoronaKnievel19

Very Few people dare contradict the MSM big Pharma Gov. ruling class. @TuckerCarlson @joerogan @RobertKennedyJr @P_McCulloughMD @DrMcFillin @realDonaldTrump If they do, They're persecuted, punished, censored, de platformed. They can't be bought. God Bless and be with them.

@MKhamenei_ir Ayatollah AI for $500 Alex...

We’re still waiting for an appropriate response from you, our southern neighbors, so that we may demonstrate our brotherhood and goodwill to you. This will not be realized unless you renounce the Arrogant Powers, who miss no opportunity to humiliate and exploit you.

@nicksortor It's BS. The same BS stall tactics ovr n ovr again. We've seen this movie before. The 'Stall' is simply an endless loop repeating... that accomplishes none of the goals of ending the Regime's ICBM and Nuke ambitions.

🚨 BREAKING: After the Pakistani PM proposed a two-week delay for President Trump’s Iran deadline, “good news is expected from both sides soon,” per CNN, citing regional sources REALLY hope that’s true! Both sides need an off-ramp!

Food for thought. Trump, Hormuz and the End of the Free Ride For half a century, Western strategists have known that the Strait of Hormuz is the acute point where energy, sea power and political will intersect. That knowledge is not in dispute. What is new in this war with Iran is that the United States, under Donald Trump, has chosen not to rush to “solve” the problem. In Hegelian terms, he is refusing an easy synthesis in order to force the underlying contradiction to the surface. The old thesis was simple: the US guarantees open sea lanes in the Gulf, and everyone else structures their economies and politics around that free insurance. Europe and the UK embraced ambitious green policies, ran down hard‑power capabilities and lectured Washington on multilateral virtue, secure in the assumption that American carriers would always appear off Hormuz. The political class behaved as if the American security guarantee were a law of nature, not a contingent choice. Their conduct today is closer to Chamberlain than Churchill: temporising, issuing statements, hoping the storm will pass without a fundamental reordering of their responsibilities. Trump’s antithesis is to withhold the automatic guarantee at the moment of maximum stress. Militarily, the US can break Iran’s residual ability to contest the Strait; that is not the binding constraint. The point is to delay that act. By allowing a closure or semi‑closure to bite, Trump ensures that the immediate pain is concentrated in exactly the jurisdictions that have most conspicuously free‑ridden on US power: the EU and the UK. Their industries, consumers and energy‑transition assumptions are exposed. In that context, his reported blunt message to European and British leaders, you need the oil out of the Strait more than we do; why don’t you go and take it? Is not a throwaway line. It is the verbalisation of the antithesis. It openly reverses the traditional presumption that America will carry the burden while its allies emote from the sidelines. In this dialectic, the prize is not simply the reopening of a chokepoint. The prize is a reordered system in which the United States effectively arbitrages and controls the global flow of oil. A world in which US‑aligned production in the Americas plus a discretionary capability to secure,or not secure, Hormuz places Washington at the centre of the hydrocarbon chessboard. For that strategic end, a rapid restoration of the old status quo would be counterproductive. A quick, surgical “fix” of Hormuz would short‑circuit the dialectic. If Trump rapidly crushed Iran’s remaining coastal capabilities, swept the mines and escorted tankers back through the Strait, Europe and the UK would heave a sigh of relief and return to business as usual: underfunded militaries, maximalist green posturing and performative disdain for US power, all underwritten by that same power. The contradiction between their dependence and their posture would remain latent. By declining to supply the synthesis on demand, and by explicitly telling London and Brussels to “go and take it” themselves, Trump forces a reckoning. European and British leaders must confront the fact that their energy systems, their industrial bases and their geopolitical sermons all rest on an American hard‑power foundation they neither finance nor politically respect. The longer the contradiction is allowed to unfold, the stronger the eventual synthesis can be: a new order in which access to secure flows, Hormuz, Venezuela and beyond, is explicitly conditional on real contributions, not assumed as a right. In that sense, the delay in “taking” the Strait, and the challenge issued to US allies to do it themselves, is not indecision. It is the negative moment Hegel insisted was necessary for history to move. Only by withholding the old guarantee, and by saying so out loud to those who depended on it, can Trump hope to end the free ride.

@DrJStrategy Not just a wake up alarm for Nations with commercial interests dependent on the Strait, but a warning shot fired across the bow of every country with hope NATO allies would act in their defense. An opportunity to demonstrate the true value and loyalty of a NATO alliance.

55,000 tons of peaches no longer have a buyer at this Peach orchard in California because Del Monte went bankrupt Del Monte Foods is the long time major buyer and processor of California peaches, now roughly 70 long-term contracts with California peach growers are terminated Over 75,000 tons of peaches no longer have buyers for the upcoming season, disrupting an entire industry

@WallStreetApes Can you get some yeast and sugar? I got a peach of an idea.

@LeaderJohnThune You certainly do look happy and relaxed after a week of ignoring DHS funding!

@TonySeruga IRGC spokesperson Brigadier General Ebrahim Zolfaghari threatened the “complete and utter annihilation” of U.S. and Israeli facilities, with Stargate's $30 billion "hidden" AI datacenter in Abu Dhabi singled out as a juicy target for Iranian destruction twitter.com/i/status/20399…

💣 The Real Legacy of Obama’s Iran Gamble When Saudi Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman recently remarked that Iran “didn’t build a single street” with the billions Barack Obama returned to the regime, he wasn’t exaggerating — he was summarizing a decade of Western self-sabotage dressed up as diplomacy. In 2015, under the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), the Obama administration unfroze over $100–150 billion of Iranian assets and sent $1.7 billion in literal cash transfers to Tehran. The official explanation was that this was Iran’s “own money,” part of a decades-old settlement from the Shah’s era. In reality, it became the single greatest funding injection ever received by the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC) — a military and intelligence octopus already controlling the nation’s economy through shell corporations and terror-aligned front groups. Within months of the payout, Iran funneled hundreds of millions to Hezbollah and Hamas, expanded its IRGC Quds Force operations across Syria and Iraq, and increased funding for Yemen’s Houthi insurgency (later responsible for targeting civilian ships in the Red Sea). Iranian officials themselves admitted it: everything from “what we eat and drink” to “our rockets” comes from Tehran’s regime coffers. While Iranian cities fell further into poverty, the regime’s war machine boomed — drones, ballistic missiles, and oil-smuggling networks began popping up in violation of international sanctions that Obama himself had dismantled. Western elites congratulated themselves on a “historic peace deal” while Tehran armed militias from Lebanon to Sana’a. And as intelligence later confirmed, Iran served as a covert haven for senior Al Qaeda figures, including Osama bin Laden’s son Hamza, who spent years under the protection of the IRGC before being groomed into jihadist leadership. Washington conveniently ignored this. 🔥 Neoliberal Chaos as a Governing Strategy The Obama team — Clinton, Nuland, Power, Rhodes — weren’t naïve idealists. They were intentional engineers of disorder. Their strategy was not to stabilize the Middle East, but to strategically destabilize it — just enough to maintain leverage over both allies and adversaries. By empowering Iran as a “regional counterweight,” they diluted the influence of the Gulf and contained Israeli power under the veneer of “nonproliferation.” But what they actually created was a proliferation of chaos, not of nukes but of dependency: Europe flooded with refugees, North Africa imploded, and militant networks metastasized in the vacuum. The Arab Spring, romanticized as a democratic awakening, devolved almost immediately into a U.S.-managed implosion — a controlled burn that shattered regional economies and sent millions fleeing toward Europe. That migratory tidal wave destabilized EU politics, broke social cohesion, and imposed irreversible demographic and fiscal stress. If that looks like an accident, you haven’t studied Washington’s history of “accidents.” 🧩 The Pattern Repeats: Ukraine and Beyond The same ideological playbook reappeared in Ukraine, Kazakhstan, Belarus, and attempts at color revolutions in Georgia and Central Europe. The toolset shifted from armies to NGOs, from bombs to “development aid.” USAID and its constellation of “civil society” fronts became the soft-gloved hand of the same policy. As independent reports have shown, millions in U.S. taxpayer money have been funneled — often through Western NGOs — into organizations later caught promoting agitation and even associating with militant movements. It’s the same coercive architecture the U.S. used to micromanage the Middle East, now redeployed against Russia’s periphery and Eastern Europe’s populist strongholds. 🕸 The Logic Beneath It All For the permanent Washington bureaucracy — the neoliberal establishment entrenched in intelligence, media, and the diplomatic corps — peace is a liability and chaos is capital. A stable Middle East would mean a self-sufficient Eurasia — and that threatens the unipolar financial and geopolitical order sustained by Washington and Brussels since 1945. Iran was never meant to be “contained.” It was meant to be weaponized as a pressure valve, a permanent destabilizer preventing the region from forming independent energy, trade, and defense alliances. The refugee crises, the proxy wars, the endless “humanitarian interventions” — all are manifestations of a consistent doctrine: weaponize volatility to preserve control. The Obama administration perfected this formula. Biden’s teams only inherited it. And every Western capital paying the price today — from Paris to Warsaw — is now living amid the debris of Obama-era globalism. In short: the Iran Deal wasn’t a mistake. It was a design. A design that traded regional peace for permanent leverage — that armed terrorists under the banner of “diplomacy” and fractured Western civilization under the banner of “human rights.” If chaos is a ladder, Obama built the first few rungs. “They called it peace — but it was an investment in permanent war.” — After-Action memo, CENTCOM analyst (2025) What began as Obama’s diplomatic victory ended as a $150 billion liquidity bomb that armed tyrants, sent millions fleeing, and handed the 21st century’s most dangerous regime the global keys to chaos. History will not remember it as diplomacy. It will remember it as economic warfare against civilization itself. ☠️

@catturd2 LOL you should see the forums on Zero Hedge. The TDS sufferers have become 'panicans' Glorious to behold

This is one of my favorite Trump tweets of all time. It’s triggering all the right people.

@unhealthytruth 30-day supply of 15 mg tablets is only: $5,800-$6,500

@unhealthytruth This rash itches, and is really annoying. I think I'll try that Rinvoq stuff I saw on the TV... It's affordable too...

🤣🤣🤣🤣🐰🐰🐰🐰🐰

@JackMurphyRGR Great! FWIW: Shia Muslim Cleric said second F15 pilot was a woman, joked he would make her his s*x slave. @ArminNavabi and @gghamari translate and analyze. At 1:33:52. youtu.be/v8BeJXpQ7sY?t=…

@GOPPollAnalyst that's a Never Have I Ever...

♥️♥️♥️

@BrassBallsBlog Haven't heard mention of Chris Wray. How could he not be involved? Joe Kent running the show give Wray the "I had no idea" plausible denial? Great work Harry.

@BrassBallsBlog @nicksortor @HarmeetKDhillon Wicked smart. HKD's US Appeals court, Civil/ngo legal history makes her plum for daycare, hospice, healthcare HHS fraud cases ripe for prosecution in CA, MN, MA, ME, FL, and now emigree birth tourism? Is birth tourism illegal? Maybe not...

@nicksortor @HarmeetKDhillon What are her results? Same as Bondi--zero. Peter Ticktin.

🚨 JUST IN: The Trump admin is considering PROMOTING Harmeet Dhillon to one of the TOP POSITIONS at the DOJ, per CBS DO IT! 🔥 This could put @HarmeetKDhillon in either the Deputy or Associate AG spot — #2 or 3 at DOJ Harmeet has been going HARD on election integrity, suing states left and right who are REFUSING to turn over their voter rolls for evaluation.

@scotthortonshow Spread some of that dark $$$$ around. You shouldn't hoard it for yourself.

These generals better show up on the Sunday morning shows to spill their guts this weekend or just leave America and never come back.

@RealGeorgeWebb1 Had the feel, smell of a slap and seal from the git go. Maybe disclosed at a later date when politically expedient for distraction purposes. Harry was spot on again.

Shake Up Day In Washington DC x.com/i/broadcasts/1…

@askgrok Is Claude now a 'Dead Name' ? Asking for ChatGPT

@zerohedge Saw Wells Fargo' Charles Scharf vouching for the safety and liquidity of private credit funds, while shilling for crypto transx approval for the private credit funds a couple days ago. An ask, emerging narrative, or getting ahead of more private credit bad news ? Sum ting wong?

And now he's mining bitcoin

"John Cornyn has run for decades with no opponents, no transparency, no highlighting the fact that he hasn't accomplished anything" @KenPaxtonTX claims Cornyn has not accomplished anything in his 46 years of being in the government