Tony Seruga

My partners and I have been lifelong data scientists. We own the digital ID of every mobile device/computer in the U.S. and have indexed and archived every IP address in the world. Our extensive experience in big and deep data, including geotracking and geolocation, makes our dozens of data companies the top authority for providing data to corporations, law enforcement, and U.S. government agencies like the CIA, NSA, DoD, DIA, NGA, NRO, FBI, as well as Interpol and foreign intelligence organizations. The Deep State and Institutions hate me for a reason. Here are a handful of my most requested resources: Voice Against Corruption Secure Whistleblower Reporting Portal Report corruption, election irregularities, financial misconduct, or foreign influence with confidence. We prioritize your safety and anonymity. Since December 2025: We have received over 30,000 whistleblower reports, 57% were insiders reporting fraud at the local, state, and federal levels, over 1,000 are legislative staff for our Congress and Senate, 11 reporting that it was their Republican employers that killed DOGE! We are also programming tools for citizen journalists, researchers, and Open-Source Intelligence (OSINT) aficionados to uncover corruption and government overreach. 🚨 Exposing the Global Arms Trade For example, we are building an app to trace hidden overlaps between arms shipments and humanitarian logistics, using open data and primary logistics nodes to identify conflicts by conflict zone or transit hub, i.e., airports, ports, and humanitarian staging grounds. Cross‑reference official flight logs and transponder logs using sites that archive ADS‑B telemetry for cargo aircraft, check donor/aid databases, including procurement contracts, identify shell contractors, analyze export data, incorporate customs and trade visualization tools, then cross‑relate NGO activities, track financial trail, and incorporate pattern recognition, identifying logistical laundering. Basically, we're building a multilayer timeline that links: ➡ Arms exports → (official trade data) ➡ Aircraft and shipping movements → (ADS‑B & AIS telemetry) ➡ NGO procurement and donor funding → (open procurement APIs) ➡ Conflict event data → (for context, like ACLED or Uppsala Conflict Data) When those patterns overlap — e.g., simultaneous spikes in “medical shipments,” procurement contracts to logistics firms, and cargo flights from airbase hubs — you’ve found a laundering signature. The antidote to hidden warfare is open data. Every satellite ping, customs code, and procurement line item is a clue — but only if people look. This tool will connect all of the dots, giving the user solid intelligence on current arms trade movements, including interceptions by bad actors and rogue nations. But to continue our work, we need volunteers, i.e., data analysts, forensic accountants, investigators, and programmers. Visit: voiceagainstcorruption.com Optin by checking the appropriate boxes toward the bottom of the form, identifying how you can help. Be sure not to check 'I wish to remain fully anonymous'. Best OSINT Resources—Tools, Websites & Intelligence Leak Aggregators exponentialthink.com/OSINT/ Unredacted Jeffrey Epstein Black Book—Full unredacted copy of Jeffrey Epstein's contact list (commonly known as the "little black book"). exponentialthink.com/privacy/epstei… Major Conspiracy Theories Overview—Curated list of prominent conspiracy theories with sources and explanations exponentialthink.com/OSINT/conspira… Private Investigator & Skip Tracer Tools—Comprehensive list of databases, surveillance equipment, digital forensics tools, and case management software for licensed investigators. exponentialthink.com/OSINT/pi.html

Rebuttal: The Ten Commandments in Arkansas Classrooms The judges' ruling betrays a fundamental misunderstanding of the relationship between religion and the American Republic. The First Amendment was written to prevent the establishment of a national church, not to sanitize the public square of all religious reference. The founders feared state-imposed theology, not the acknowledgment of the divine foundations of moral order. To remove the Ten Commandments from classrooms under the guise of “neutrality” is, in fact, to take a side — to enshrine a secular orthodoxy in direct conflict with the public will of the people of Arkansas, and contrary to the historical record of the United States. 1. Historical Precedent and Constitutional Heritage The Ten Commandments have never been purely “religious” artifacts; they are moral-legal cornerstones from which Western law derives much of its ethical core — prohibitions on murder, theft, perjury, and more. When Moses holds tablets above the eastern entrance to the U.S. Supreme Court, it is not decorative — it is declarative. It recognizes the law’s moral antecedent. Jefferson, Madison, and Adams all acknowledged God as the moral author of liberty; even non-believers among the founders recognized Biblical ethics as the scaffolding for natural law and civil freedom. If it is constitutional for the Supreme Court itself to feature depictions of Moses and the Ten Commandments, then it cannot be unconstitutional for Arkansas schools to display the same in moral instruction. 2. The People’s Will and Democratic Integrity The people of Arkansas overwhelmingly supported this measure. By overturning it, the court replaces the will of the governed with judicial preference. That is not neutrality — that is activism. The judiciary’s legitimate power derives from the consent of the governed; when the people affirm moral instruction for their children consistent with the nation’s founding values, the court’s intrusion is an affront to self-government itself. 3. The False Doctrine of “Hostility as Neutrality” Modern jurisprudence often mistakes hostility toward religion as neutrality. Yet true neutrality permits the coexistence of religious reference in civic life. Removing the Ten Commandments signals not separation of church and state, but submission of state to secularism. It elevates unbelief to the status of official ideology — violating the very balance the First Amendment was designed to preserve. 4. Moral Order and Civic Responsibility Public education was never intended to be morally sterile. From the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 — ratified even before the Constitution — Congress declared: “Religion, morality, and knowledge being necessary to good government and the happiness of mankind, schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged.” To reject the teaching of the Ten Commandments is to reject this founding understanding — that civic virtue cannot endure without moral grounding. In the absence of moral principle, law descends into mere force, and culture into nihilism. In Summary The Constitution protects freedom of religion, not freedom from religion. The Ten Commandments are historical and moral documents, not sectarian worship materials. Judicial nullification of the people’s moral will subverts self-governance. The Court’s own architecture acknowledges the same moral heritage the judge now forbids schoolchildren to even see. The display of the Ten Commandments in Arkansas classrooms does not establish a church — it reminds citizens where law itself originates: not from men, but from a higher moral order the Founders themselves revered.

🚨 Judge Strikes Down 10 Commandments Display I’ll say it again and keep saying it. We should take a page from El Salvador President Nayib Bukele: "The first thing we did to save our country was to impeach and remove all of the corrupt Judges..." 🎯 These are the kinds of activist judges that need to be removed! LFG! Maybe it's past time to begin rounding up the judges and see just how committed they are to their judicial activism! #selection-271.19-271.83" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">archive.is/Ks7MW#selectio…

Beltway power couples are making bank by gaming the system!

🚨 Iran Publicly Hangs 19-Year-Old Champion Wrestler Despite President Trump and U.S. Warnings Iran has just publicly executed a 19-year-old champion wrestler who protested against the Iranian regime. Wrestler Saleh Mohammadi was publicly hanged by Iranian judicial officials after he vocally protested against the inhumane actions of Iran’s former Supreme Leader and other Iranian officials. Fox News broke the tragic news of the execution: foxnews.com/sports/mojtaba…

Sen. Jon Husted (R), Ohio's former secretary of state, who oversaw the state's election procedures, says he will offer a live UC on the floor to require photo IDs for voters nationwide. He's responding to Chuck Schumer's claim that Democrats support photo ID at the polls.

Thune and the Senate establishment were secretly still stonewalling the SAVE America Act, not because they oppose election integrity, but because they oppose structural transparency. TONIGHT'S VOTE HOTLINING A FREESTANDING BILL IS A REAL VOTE! LET'S SEE WHO OPPOSES!!!! We are WATCHING! 🔎 The bill would permanently expose the corruption, errors, and bureaucratic self-dealing that both parties depend on to maintain power. When this passes, the age of theatrical partisan politics ends, and the age of accountable data-driven governance begins — something the existing Senate leadership cannot survive.

🚨 WE ABSOLUTELY MUST PASS THE SAVE AMERICA ACT! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸 Democrats oppose the SAVE America Act, arguing that it would impose undue obstacles to voter registration and participation, thereby disenfranchising millions of eligible citizens lacking convenient access to the identification documents required under the bill. Yet this raises an obvious question: if these same individuals are already able to obtain public assistance such as housing support, SNAP benefits, or welfare—each of which requires valid identification—why would that very same ID not suffice for voting?

The Numbers (as of March 19, 2026) - Global LNG production down ~3–4%. - Asian LNG up 40–90%. - European TTF futures up 50%. - U.S. LNG profit per cargo: now $40–50 million, double pre-crisis levels. - Monthly windfall to U.S. LNG exporters: $8–14 billion. - Projected annualized gain if Ras Laffan remains offline: $150+ billion. These are not marginal price adjustments — this is a global wealth transfer of hundreds of billions from consumers to energy elites. 😡

QatarEnergy Statement on Missile Attacks on its LNG Facilities In addition to the previous attack on Ras Laffan Industrial City on Wednesday 18 March 2026 that resulted in extensive damage to the Pearl GTL (Gas-to-Liquids) facility, QatarEnergy confirms that in the early hours of Thursday 19 March 2026, several of its Liquefied Natural Gas (LNG) facilities were the subject of missile attacks, causing sizeable fires and extensive further damage. Emergency response teams were deployed immediately to contain the resulting damage with no reported casualties. QatarEnergy will continue to communicate the latest available information. #Qatar

Iran’s missiles might have struck Qatari soil, but the explosion that really matters detonated in the derivatives markets and LNG trade books of Houston, London, and Geneva. The people getting richer are: - U.S. LNG exporters and shale producers - European oil majors and trading houses - Energy hedge funds and commodity speculators And the victims? Every nation that actually buys gas to keep its people warm or its factories running.

Iran’s attack on Qatar has damaged facilities that produce about 17% of its liquefied natural gas export capacity and repairs will take three to five years, QatarEnergy CEO said according to a Reuters report bloomberg.com/news/articles/…

The tragedy is predictable. When you über-centralize the energy supply chain, allow megacorporations to dominate “market-based” energy pricing, and let wars rewrite the rules of scarcity, the smoke always clears to reveal the same smiling faces counting record profits.

Before the 2020 election steal, Democrats were all about securing elections. They believe elections could easily be manipulated. Watch this documentary created BY THE LEFT! It was their calling card that elections could easily be hacked, but then, the day after the 2020 election, they flipped the script a complete 180! rumble.com/v2okb5a-kill-c…

Amen!

🧩 The Duke Lacrosse Hoax: America’s First Trial by Narrative How a 2006 Media Scandal Became the Blueprint for Modern Ideological Control In 2006, three Duke University lacrosse players were accused of raping a black stripper—a story seemingly made for the media’s hunger for moral drama. It carried all the ingredients of a perfect narrative: privileged white athletes, a poor black woman, and a supposed act of racial and sexual domination. The press exploded in moral certainty before investigators had even reviewed the evidence. What began as a simple lie metastasized into a parable about “power and privilege.” The players were quickly presumed guilty, not for what they had done, but for who they were. District Attorney Mike Nifong pursued the case recklessly, hoping to secure re‑election on a wave of racial outrage. Duke’s administration panicked, disbanding the team and suspending innocent men. Faculty members joined the mob with an open letter assuming guilt, later infamous as the “Group of 88.” The supposed victim’s story soon fell apart under forensic scrutiny. The DNA results cleared the accused entirely. Nifong was disbarred, but by then, the nation had already learned its new epistemology: emotion over evidence. The Duke case revealed how institutions crumble under the pressure of moral theater. It showcased the rise of a secular religion built on grievance and guilt, where the appearance of virtue mattered more than truth itself. The media treated the falsehood not as a failure, but as a symbolic success—a story that “felt true,” even if it wasn’t. Its function wasn’t to inform the public but to reinforce a worldview: that white male privilege is the original sin of America. In the years that followed, this mindset spread from universities to the broader culture. Academia codified the logic into an engine of grievance studies—fields focused not on discovery but on moral accusation. “Intersectionality” replaced logic with hierarchy: truth was now mediated through identity. “Believe all victims” became an ethical mandate that eliminated the presumption of innocence. The very essence of justice—doubt, evidence, and procedure—was reframed as oppression. The next stage of infection came through the media. Outrage became the dominant business model. Newsrooms realized that anger engaged audiences better than accuracy, and Twitter gave unverified emotion a global printing press. The Duke template reproduced itself in stories like Trayvon Martin, Michael Brown, and Rolling Stone’s fraudulent “A Rape on Campus.” The pattern was constant: accusation first, facts later—if ever. Corporations were next to fold. HR departments evolved into ideological enforcement arms. After 2015, no major company could afford to look “unenlightened.” Thus began the age of mandatory bias workshops, loyalty pledges disguised as “trainings,” and career advancement measured by one’s fluency in jargon. What had been moral panic in 2006 became bureaucratic religion a decade later. Compliance was a moral virtue, and silence was complicity. The DEI apparatus made its ideology profitable. Corporations poured billions into “equity consulting,” while universities minted graduates fluent in oppression vocabulary. A self‑licking ice‑cream cone of moral commerce was born: activists manufactured guilt, consultants monetized it, and both relied on each other to stay in business. This is how a lie became an economy. By 2020, the pandemic and George Floyd’s death fused trauma politics with corporate policy. Governments joined the faith. Federal agencies adopted “equity mandates” and funded new bureaucracies to enforce them. Even the military began purging perceived “extremism” using ideological checklists, redirecting soldiers from strategy to sociology. Law enforcement learned paralysis; hesitation replaced policing. The emotional logic that destroyed reputations at Duke began dismantling national competence. Today, the nation lives inside a bureaucratic theocracy—a moral machine lacking a god but rich in priests. The same dogma that sentenced innocent athletes in 2006 is now embedded in hiring software, federal grant guidelines, and classroom pedagogy. It no longer needs disciples; it runs on autopilot. The moral language has softened—terms like “inclusion,” “safety,” and “well‑being” mask the same command: conform, or be investigated. From this point, America faces three paths. Reform is possible if transparency and merit are restored—if leaders demand results instead of rhetoric. Revolt becomes likely if the public grows fed up with ideological coercion; parallel schools, banks, and media could rise outside the captured system. Entrenchment, the most dangerous future, arrives if fear wins: a smiling technocracy where AI algorithms enforce “values alignment,” and dissent isn’t punished but quietly erased. Survival within this environment demands clarity and courage. It means speaking truth without self‑destruction, documenting everything, and building excellence so undeniable that even ideologues hesitate to attack. It means keeping your finances independent, forming honest networks, and teaching your children that feelings are not facts. Resist the temptation of outrage; humor and competence are deadlier weapons against hysteria. And above all, it means remembering that moral panics feed on fear and guilt. Reject both. The antidote to ideological tyranny is calm strength—the person who stays rational when the crowd panics. Every whistleblower, every quietly brave teacher, every worker who refuses to speak lies under duress, chips away at the edifice that began to collapse the truth two decades ago in Durham, North Carolina. The Duke Lacrosse hoax wasn’t just a false accusation; it was the first full rehearsal for the era of narrative supremacy. It trained institutions to abandon truth for politics and pioneered the moral economy that now governs boardrooms and bureaucracies alike. The next chapter, whether reform or revolt, will hinge on whether enough individuals decide that courage has more value than compliance. The story that “felt true” but wasn’t eventually became the social operating system of America. The task before us is to reverse the contagion: to make truth feel sacred again, and to remember that civilization cannot survive the convenience of beautiful lies.

🧨 Inside the Intelligence Meltdown: Why Joe Kent’s Resignation Shook Washington to Its Core Understand that when Joe Kent says “we were stopped from continuing to investigate,” it implies interagency interference with data sharing or directive constraints—not just him being personally muzzled. His team likely had fusion intelligence leads tied to classified sources from at least the FBI, NSA, or Treasury’s FinCEN, which means his protest reveals cross-agency interference. The FBI controls counterterrorism investigations with domestic implications. DOJ oversees the prosecutorial aspects, meaning if they decide to “hand off” a case to state authorities, the NCTC loses bandwidth to operate independently on related intelligence. This creates a structural vulnerability: if DOJ labels an assassination as “non-terroristic” or “lone gunman,” NCTC’s access is automatically cut off. That’s precisely what Kent was alluding to. Once authorities framed the Charlie Kirk shooting as a local criminal act, NCTC could no longer analyze it under their terrorism mandate — even if there were anomalies suggesting there was more to uncover. A “cease data query” directive (formal or informal) was issued from the National Intelligence Council’s counterterrorism coordination cell. That blocked NCTC analysts from pursuing foreign data correlations (e.g., foreign influence chatter tied to Robinson’s identity or activities). Why This Is So Damning Institutionally For an NCTC Director to resign citing conscience and suppressed Iran-related intelligence signals that: Why This Is So Damning Institutionally For a NCTC Director to resign citing conscience and suppressed Iran-related intelligence signals that: • The IC’s integrative function has collapsed — the center designed to prevent stovepiping has now become stovepiped itself. • The executive chain of communication to the president is corrupted by political filtering — the intelligence fed upwards is curated for ideology. • Investigations with national security implications are being deliberately reframed to exclude the federal nexus, avoiding embarrassing discovery. And remember — Kent’s protest isn’t ideological; it’s procedural. He’s saying: the machinery built to protect transparency and rational security strategy is being weaponized to obscure reality. That’s a civilizational-level red flag. Implications Beyond This Administration Historically, when figures of Kent’s status break ranks, it’s a sign of crisis in internal legitimacy. Think of: • Admiral Fallon’s resignation under Bush (over the Iran bombing plans in 2008). • William Binney’s NSA defection after 9/11. • DIA Director Michael Flynn’s firing for questioning CIA Syria narratives. Each event preceded major geopolitical ruptures. If this pattern holds, Kent’s stand signals that the intelligence-military elite faction that opposes foreign entanglements is back in open revolt. What Comes Next These are the probable outcomes: 1. Criminal-Administrative Isolation: Kent will be targeted under “unauthorized disclosure” statutes (esp. 18 U.S.C. §798). Expect denial of security clearances, frozen pensions, and a quiet character assassination in press leaks. 2. Parallel Narratives: The official version (mainstream media): “disgruntled ex-official undermines wartime unity.” The counter-version (independent analysis): “veteran insider confirms political corruption of intelligence.” 3. Reopening the Kirk Case: Pressure for transparency will grow, especially if independent journalists or whistleblowers release NCTC cross-data showing anomalies in the Utah shooter’s background.

Vote everyone of them out! Then go after their donors. That's the REAL evil!

“Gas prices in Europe rose 30 per cent as markets reopened and have more than doubled since the start of the war, as traders try to calculate the impact of months, or longer, without Qatar’s gas flowing to world markets.” archive.is/2026.03.19-143…

@Mezzie13603591 Catfish much? 🤡

@TonySeruga Trump is the deep state Dip shit how much more proof do you need

It is going to be worse than The Exorcist, The Shining, and Sinister combined! THE DEEP STATE IS COMING HARD FOR PRESIDENT TRUMP AND ANYONE ASSOCIATED WITH HIM…. MAGA/America First needs to prepare for bankruptcy and possibly jail time. newrepublic.com/article/207369…

🚨 What Many Analysts Get Wrong About the Iran War My Executive Brief The article “What Many Analysts Get Wrong About the Iran War” contends that most Western commentary misreads the ongoing U.S.–Israeli campaign against Iran. While mainstream narratives emphasize chaos, escalation, and humanitarian tolls, the piece argues that strategically, the coalition is prevailing. Measured through traditional criteria of military effectiveness—capability attrition, loss of initiative, and strategic isolation—Iran’s position is deteriorating. Its ballistic and drone arsenals are depleted, its launch systems disrupted, and its logistics fractured. Sustained coalition air dominance has made air defenses largely irrelevant, enabling systematic strikes on the defense-industrial infrastructure meant to cripple Iran’s long-term capacity to rearm. Even Iran’s retaliation mechanisms—the Strait of Hormuz and its transnational proxy network—are described as self-defeating. The Strait’s closure isolates Iran economically, especially from China, while uncoordinated proxy attacks reveal fragmentation rather than coherent escalation. The article admits that public communication from coalition governments has been inconsistent, but maintains that outcomes outweigh perception. For Western allies such as Canada, the author sees a lesson: military readiness and industrial resilience are foundations of relevance in a world where power is again contested materially. By results, the coalition is not faltering—it is executing and winning. #selection-691.0-703.18" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">archive.is/EVviW#selectio…

Thanks, @realDonaldTrump, for calling these frauds out! Maybe @epaleezeldin and the @EPA can test the groundwater where these hazardous monstrosities reside! There is no such thing as ‘clean’ energy; solar and wind are ‘alternative energy’, but there is nothing ‘clean’ about them. What you can learn from a TV show, because our schools are woke, globalist nonsense. youtu.be/fmbZwxEnAFc?si…