fildomains
346 posts

fildomains
@fildomains
FNS is a completely open source, complete and sustainable operation, A name system fully compatible with ENS on FILECOIN that everyone
Beigetreten Ağustos 2022
377 Folgt49 Follower


我到底该不该来香港 Web3 嘉年华?
(附门票福利:0G特邀,主会场价值299刀单日票10张)
很多人问我:现在市场这么冷,还有必要飞去香港参会吗?
我从正反两个角度讲清楚哈:
如果你是真实的builder,以及是对于加密如何结合AI有很高的兴趣的爱好者,但苦于高昂的门票价格犹豫来不来。请转发此推,并留言告诉我为什么你参会的主要目的和你的luma邮箱。我会选10位朋友送出免费的单日票。
一、正面:为什么值得来
1)这是少数“还在发生真实连接”的地方,而且由于今年中东局势,迪拜Token 2049取消,香港嘉年华可能是上半年最重要的Web3会议了。
熊市里,线上是情绪,线下是资源。很多真正的合作、投资、甚至项目转折,都是在现场聊出来的。
2)你能看到“谁还在认真做事”:牛市看叙事,熊市看人。谁还在搭团队、推产品、见用户,一眼就能分辨。
3)亚洲依然是最有活力的流动性和用户市场:不管你愿不愿意承认,很多真正的资金、用户和交易行为,还是在这边发生。
4)信息差仍然存在,而且很大:Twitter 上看到的和现场聊到的可能完全不一样,现场才是正在发生的roadmap、funding、真实数据。
二、负面:为什么你可能不该来
1)如果你只是来“刷存在感”,那真的没必要
拍几张照片、发几条推,对你没有任何长期价值。
2)如果你没有明确目标,这趟基本是浪费时间
没有要见的人、没有要推进的事,参会 ≠ 进步。
3)大量无效社交,甚至是噪音:90% 的 conversation 都不会产生结果。你需要有能力筛选那 10%。
4)市场确实还在冷周期:不要期待“来一趟就有机会/融资/暴涨”。这是一个 build & connect 的阶段。
❗️注意请同时注册申请Luma链接

中文

@elonmusk Who's gonna do it first, the U.S. government or the Chinese government?
English

🥞 Weekly CAKE Stats
Net CAKE Mint: -707k CAKE (-$1.42M)
Total Product Burns: 858k CAKE ($1.73M) -1%
🔥 Burn Breakdown:
➤ AMM v2: 555k CAKE ($1.12M) -10%
➤ AMM v3: 197k CAKE ($398k) +34%
➤ AMM Infinity: 24.9k CAKE ($50k) +16%
➤ Other Sources (Prediction, Perpetual, etc.): 80k CAKE ($162k) -1%
Proof of burn 🔍 bscscan.com/tx/0xe757daa58…
Burn Dashboard 📊 pancakeswap.finance/burn-dashboard
English

@PancakeSwap I have read the source codes of CakeToken and MasterChef. Each block can mint 40 cakes. Currently, on Binance Smart Chain, a block is generated approximately every 0.5 seconds. Thus, 6,912,000 cakes can be minted every day instead of 40,000 cakes. Why?
English

🗳️ Voting is LIVE: CAKE Token Max Supply Reduction
After sharing the proposal for discussion, we received a range of feedback and support from the community. Now, it’s time to vote on the official proposal.
👉 Vote here: pancakeswap.finance/voting/proposa…
🔹 Proposal: Reduce CAKE's max supply from 450M to 400M CAKE

PancakeSwap@PancakeSwap
🥞 Discussion of Proposal to Reduce CAKE Max Supply Following the rollout of CAKE Tokenomics 3.0, CAKE’s token supply has achieved a net burn of ~8.19% in 2025 Given this momentum, the Kitchen is proposing to: 🔹 Reduce CAKE’s max supply from 450M to 400M CAKE 🤝Your feedback is important to us, and we are committed to maintaining an open dialogue with our community before moving forward with the official vote. Please share your thoughts in the Forum: forum.pancakeswap.finance/t/discussion-o…
English
fildomains retweetet

The 350 Million EOS Incident: A Legal-Structure Analysis of Misrepresentation, Misappropriation, and a Complete Securities-Fraud Pattern (Including the Resignation of Yves La Rose)
This post does not allege criminal conduct.
It is a legal-structure assessment based solely on publicly observable facts, community statements, and on-chain activity.
Based on current information, the minting and subsequent disposition of 350,000,000 EOS under the “New Economic Model” display a pattern that aligns with all four foundational elements of securities fraud under U.S. and Canadian jurisprudence.
1. Factual Background: Representations, Conduct, and a Key Governance Event (Resignation)
1️⃣ Minting 350M EOS under the “New Economic Model”
One of the largest supply expansions in EOS history, approved only because of clear public representations:
“These tokens will be used for RAM-ecosystem development and long-term EOS growth.”
2️⃣ Public Representations of Purpose
The 350M EOS was consistently described as funding for:
RAM ecosystem development
Infrastructure and protocol enhancement
Community and builder support
Long-term economic growth
These representations formed the basis for community reliance and approval.
3️⃣ Actual Conduct: Funds Transferred to Kraken (CEX)
Public on-chain data indicates that a significant portion of the 350M EOS was:
Transferred to Kraken, a centralized exchange
unicove.com/en/vaulta/tran…
unicove.com/en/vaulta/tran…
Without prior disclosure
Without community authorization
Without delivering any RAM-related initiatives
Without providing a transparent explanation
This represents a material deviation from the stated purpose.
4️⃣ Critical Event: Resignation of Yves La Rose, Former Foundation CEO
Public records show that:
As concerns over the 350M EOS escalated
As community questions increased
And as no satisfactory explanation was provided
Yves La Rose, the head of the EOS Foundation, resigned.
His resignation does not constitute evidence of wrongdoing.
However, from a legal-structure perspective, it represents a governance breakdown and introduces:
Heightened informational uncertainty
Disruption of the accountability chain
Reduced transparency
Impairment of the community’s ability to obtain explanations
In securities-law analysis, such events often signal material governance risk.
5️⃣ Resulting Impact on the Community
The combination of:
Purpose deviation
Undisclosed exchange transfers
Absence of RAM development
Leadership resignation
led to:
Loss of market confidence
Price decline
Collapse of community trust
Quantifiable economic harm to token holders
These outcomes are legally relevant.
2. Legal Framework: All Four Elements of Securities Fraud Are Satisfied
U.S. (SEC Rule 10b-5) and Canadian (CSA) frameworks use a four-element test.
Current facts indicate all four elements are met.
✔ Element 1 — Misrepresentation or Omission of Material Fact
Promised: RAM ecosystem + long-term development
Actual: Large-scale transfer to a CEX; no RAM initiatives delivered
A textbook material misrepresentation.
✔ Element 2 — Intent or Recklessness
Intent (scienter) may be inferred when a leader:
Makes explicit public promises
Exercises control over newly minted assets
Diverts assets to an undisclosed destination
Maintains opacity
And resigns amid intensified scrutiny
Resignation is not evidence of guilt, but in structural analysis it reinforces the pattern of reckless disregard, which satisfies the legal standard for intent.
✔ Element 3 — Reliance
The community approved minting solely because of the stated purpose.
Had the true outcome been disclosed, support would not have existed.
This satisfies reliance.
✔ Element 4 — Damages
After the deviation and resignation became known:
Price fell
Confidence collapsed
Holders experienced measurable losses
This fulfills the damages requirement.
Conclusion
This analysis does not assign criminal liability.
It identifies that the observed conduct aligns structurally with:
Misrepresentation
Misappropriation
Breach of fiduciary-like duties
Reckless disregard for transparency
Investor reliance
Economic harm
Together, these form a complete securities-fraud structure as defined in U.S. and Canadian legal doctrine.
Whether regulators act is a separate matter; the structural pattern itself is unmistakable.
3. Broader Governance Implications for Web3
This incident raises fundamental issues:
Whether token holders can rely on public representations
Stewardship and fiduciary-like responsibilities over community assets
Transparency obligations in decentralized governance
The governance vacuum created by leadership resignation
Increased investor risk due to informational uncertainty
These challenges extend beyond EOS.
4. Open Call to Securities, Investment-Fraud, Class-Action, and Digital-Asset Attorneys
This matter intersects with:
Misrepresentation
Diversion of community funds
Governance failures
Fiduciary-duty–like breaches
Investor reliance and damages
Executive resignation amid scrutiny
Digital-asset classification
Cross-border regulatory considerations
Attorneys experienced in:
Securities litigation
Investment fraud
Class actions
Misappropriation cases
Digital-asset disputes
Governance and duty-of-care frameworks
are invited to provide interpretation or commentary.
@HagensBerman
@blbglaw
@GrantEisenhofer
@KesslerTopaz
@CohenMilstein
@KellerRohrback
@PomerantzLLP
@LabatonLaw
@RobbinsLLP
@Levi_Korsinsky
@GPM_LLP
@TheSecuritiesLaw
@SecuritiesDocket
@SecuritiesTrial
@InvestorLawyer
@InvestorProtec1
@SecuritiesAtty
@MaleckiLaw
@myinvestmentfra
@BrokeAndBroker
@AdvisorLawLLC
@ChaseACarlson
@CarlsonLaw
@Rosen_Firm
@SchallLaw
@FaruqiLaw
@ScottScottLaw
@TopClassActions
@ClassActionNews
@ClassActionGuru
@CryptoLawUS
@BlockchainLegal
@CryptoAssetLaw
@QuinnEmanuel
@BoiesSchiller
@SiskindsLLP
@kmlawllp
@RochonGenovaLLP
@StockwoodsLLP
@diamond_lawyers
@icpclaw
@ForemanCompany
Closing Statement
This document is a non-accusatory legal-structure analysis based on publicly accessible information.
The EOS community deserves clarity.
Transparency is not optional—it is foundational.
Additional statements, on-chain data, or documentation are welcome for further verification.
All images and screenshots are used solely for public-interest commentary and analysis of governance issues. No allegations of wrongdoing are being made.
All statements in this post are based on publicly available information and are presented for analytical and informational purposes only.
Regulatory & Investor-Protection Agencies (U.S. & Canada)
(included for public-interest context and regulatory-awareness purposes only)
🇺🇸 United States — SEC
@SECGov
@SEC_Enforcement
@SEC_Investor_Ed
🇨🇦 Canada — National & Provincial Regulators
CSA — Canadian Securities Administrators
@CSA_ACVM
OSC — Ontario Securities Commission
@OntSecCom
AMF Québec — Autorité des marchés financiers
@LAutorite
BCSC — British Columbia Securities Commission
@BCSC_info
CSA Investor Education
@CSA_News




English

加入我,使用 Aave App 开始赚取 6.00% 年化收益率 的储蓄收益!注册时输入推荐码 BEF7FE,即可提升候补名单位置。 aave.com/r/BEF7FE
中文

"有多少人持有BNB链的DOGE?" 🎁 10000 狗狗币 红包来啦!还剩 20 个,手慢无! gougoubi.ai/giveaway?id=90
中文



















