angloscot

12.7K posts

angloscot

angloscot

@floppsieian

Unto yourself (and others) always be true - otherwise what’s the point

London, England Beigetreten Eylül 2009
251 Folgt911 Follower
angloscot retweetet
Allison Pearson
Allison Pearson@AllisonPearson·
What does Liz Kendall mean by “illegal content”? People pointing out that governments which allowed mass uncontrolled immigration have made our country a lot less safe? Pointing out sex criminals and terrorists are granted asylum? Well? @leicesterliz
Laila Cunningham@policylaila

Remember when they told us the Online Safety Act was just about protecting children? We warned you exactly where it would lead. I was guilt-tripped on TV that I didn’t care about children. The Uniparty doesn’t believe in free speech. If you want to protect it, vote for it.

English
101
752
2.4K
48.3K
angloscot retweetet
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧@TRobinsonNewEra·
A PUBLIC APOLOGY - I AM SO SORRY I need to apologise to all the politicians who serve us with such great integrity. I also need to apologise to all mainstream media outlets who keep us informed with 100% truth on a daily basis. I need to apologise to all uber liberal and hard left activists who just want to make the world a better place for us all. I want to apologise for imported engineers who get their cocks out in public and in front of 11 year old girls, that's totally my fault. I want to apologise for imported engineers who savagely attempt to behead people in public, again, totally my fault, I own that. I want to apologise for all the imported engineers who sexually molest women and children on the regular, that behaviour and that culture is 100% my fault. I want to apologise for the 40,000 or so Muslims who are on the UK terror watch list, again, my bad, I hold my hands up. I hope all you politicians, media outlets, and far left activists can find it in your gracious, kind hearts to forgive me.
Tommy Robinson 🇬🇧 tweet media
English
1.6K
4.9K
32.1K
726.2K
angloscot retweetet
Ben Habib
Ben Habib@benhabib6·
Starmer’s reaction to the attempted beheading of a British citizen by a Sundanese barbarian: Tighten free speech laws so we cannot complain. He should be on trial along with the barbarian.
English
252
4.2K
25.6K
144K
angloscot retweetet
angloscot retweetet
J Stewart
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_·
🔥 “You Created This Division!” Konstantin Kisin Slams Labour MP To His Face Over Immigration The scale of immigration that has flooded Britain is absolutely MIND-BLOWING. It’s almost impossible to comprehend. On Question Time, @KonstantinKisin absolutely tore into a Labour MP to his face about this very issue and it’s well worth a listen, especially with what’s happening in Belfast right now. “The attempt to paint your political opponents as intolerant and bigoted never worked. You called half the country racist during the referendum. It didn’t work. Then you called us racist again. It still didn’t work. This politics of division? You did this to Britain!” Then he hit them with the jaw-dropping facts: “Under the Blair Labour government, you brought more people into this country in just 10 years than arrived between 1066, the Battle of Hastings, and 1950. More in a decade than in an entire millennium!” Labour’s reckless, open-borders mass migration created the divisions they now scream about. Anyone who dares speak the truth gets branded a “racist”. This is what their experiment has done to Britain. We told you this would happen. Now look where we are.
English
48
1.7K
7.5K
152.9K
angloscot retweetet
Bernie
Bernie@Artemisfornow·
🚨Welcome to England… where we can’t fly our flag incase we upset migrants and those who hate us. Yes you read that correctly 🤡
Bernie tweet media
English
405
3.7K
12.6K
105.3K
angloscot retweetet
Dominic Cummings
Dominic Cummings@Dominic2306·
NB. Some of Healey criticism is right. BUT it's also right that the WORST parts of the MoD have run rings around him. He hasn't worked with No10 and HMT to face reality honestly. HMT is right about the worst parts of the senior MoD and Healey not gripping it. The MoD is right that HMT processes and general procurement laws make their job impossible, and CO won't support them in changing them. The CO is right to say that the Mod v HMT battle involves everybody lying. And No10 is right that everybody including the CO is lying to them and the CO which is supposed to 'coordinate' cannot. Everybody involved is part lying and part telling truth. Only a PM determined to face reality and use their full constitutional authority -- a Gvt that controls the Gvt -- can solve this pathological nightmare. In one week a new PM could get very close to honest budget numbers and be briefed on the secret nuke budgets. I said before the 2024 election; all discussions of public finances are fake because all Nat Sec budgets are big and fake. This blow up means the next PM will have to face reality finally - *classify, punt, spin fake accounts* has run out of room after 20-25 yrs. But NB. this will have big implications for the entire spending plans. Sorting out the nuke nightmare is huge. And current spending plans are absurd, pretending to do big cuts in the year before the election. So it's almost inconceivable the current spending envelopes remain, the new PM will do an emergency budget and a new SR. Good officials desperate to avoid another PM melting down shd start work on this now so IF there is finally a decent regime in No10, you are ahead of the game...
Dominic Cummings@Dominic2306

My pinned tweet explains the background to Healey resignation. We got real numbers in 2020 for first time in ~20 years. Since then everything reverted to fake. Thanks to Trolley & Wally, they let HMT and MoD shovel cash into things they KNEW were broken, like AJAX, and scuppered funding the future (e.g drones, robotics, AI, cloud). The nuclear weapons supply chain is a multi-billion multi-decade fiasco and reinforces fake budgets. MoD & CO used UKR war to prop up the lies and disasters, not to fix them. Trolley, Sunak and Starmer all went along with: classify, punt, spin fake budgets. All these chickens are coming home to roost. The DIP is a disaster because it combines: a/ continuing to fund old things which shd be scrapped but senior people's careers rest on lying about, b/ failure to fund the future, c/ more dodgy accounts, d/ classified nuke shitshow, which forces lies/cannibalisation of conventional, and e/ continued failure to change procurement and long term budgets despite covid and UKR. Ive said this 100 times for years. Also relevant to resignation -- In 2020, I got the PM & CHX to agree to take the next gen fighter AWAY from HMT and MoD. (FOI the doc screenshotted below!) They were using a bogus 'above STRAP 3 study' to claim that AI would be irrelevant to future fighters in 2045. This 'top secret' study was written *before* DeepMind was created!! We agreed to take away the next gen fighter/drones from MoD/HMT and put them into a new civilian project with huge commercial development of drones/robotics/AI, with procurement and budgets done totally outside normal system (like vaccines, ARPA etc). After I left this was u-turned along with shredding all the true budget numbers. The MoD and HMT proceeded with the usual procurement with BaE. This has now blown up *as it was obvious it would SIX YEARS ago'. HMT is refusing to fund it because the MoD is a corrupt shambles. And MoD is knackered by the HMT's insane budget processes and insane procurement. HMT and MoD have reasonable complaints about each other. 'Everyone's right and everyone's unhappy'. The only way out is the Vote Leave plan and No10 smashing heads together with the full authority of the PM, as in the secret process of 2020. It cannot be left to 'normal processes'. Senior people must be forced to tell the truth 'or you're fired'. We did this. It works! The MPs refuse to engage. The MPs on defence committee say they cannot ask officials re the 2020 process because 'they'll just refuse to answer'. But our enemies know everything everything I say is true! It is impossible for dud Starmer to solve these problems. It is good timing that Burnham will soon take over and could draw a line under decades of Tory failure and set out a new path... But there will be HUGE pressure from the old system, in HMT and MoD, to patch everythign up with more lies, spin, fake accounts, and massive classification... Maybe some MPs could finally pay attention to these issues and resolve to stop constant lies, please! Our security, prosperity and critical technologies are at stake and the old parties and old Whitehall are pathological! NB. In 2020 we also bought LEO satellites. SW1 laughed. Starlink has been critical in UKR. Whitehall sold off the satellites! NB. In March 2022 when the UKR disaster started I wrote: 'Prediction: 1) lessons from UKR will overwhelmingly support the arguments of those who in 2020 argued for radical MoD changes (including taking money from old tank projects that everybody privately admitted were a multi-billion pound disaster) and 2) the correct criticism of the review and connected documents will be seen as a) they did not go nearly far enough, b) the collapse of No10 follow through on defence reform in 2021 was — like the collapse of 2020 plans for planning reform, tax cuts, deregulation, Project Speed, intense focus on R&D and skills etc — a disaster for the country (and a political disaster for the Tory Party).' NB. Special Forces who have observed the drone wars in UKR have told the senior MoD repeatedly that the mega expensive things they want to plough cash into in the DIP will get VAPOURISED in a real war by cheap drones! The SF are told to shut up and not give HMT a chance to cut the budgets! I know it's psychologically extremely hard for SW1 but Vote Leave worked with the deep state on this in 2020 and we were right on all the big things. The disastrous old processes have now blown up with unprecedented resignation over these exact issues. 6 years have been wasted. Tens of billions have been wasted. Lives lost. Talent resigned.. Opportunities to lead squandered... All over Whitehall are officials involved in 2020 who know what I say is true, the MPs and hacks should finally get the details into the public... Maybe SW1 could update its mental models?! Ps. if you're a hack still getting Ciaran 'AI is fake, PRC infiltration is overrated' Martin to comment on tech, you're as dud as Starmer

English
29
167
809
174.2K
angloscot retweetet
Daniel Hannan
Daniel Hannan@DanielJHannan·
Never mind the politics. Never mind what it means for the Labour leadership. Ponder the seriousness of the claim which John Healey and Al Carns are making. Britain can no longer defend itself adequately.
English
69
392
1.7K
20.3K
angloscot retweetet
Allison Pearson
Allison Pearson@AllisonPearson·
🚨As I write, African males who arrived in the UK illegally and have a history of attacking women are being granted leave to remain. It’s so insane no one can believe it. It’s true. Men from Sudan, Eritrea, Afghan cannot have asylum claims rejected. Because human rights.
English
397
3.5K
14.5K
117K
angloscot retweetet
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
Murderous migrants beheading innocent people in their home town is what’s making people angry, not “social media”!
English
16K
89.7K
562.7K
51.6M
angloscot retweetet
Daniel Hannan
Daniel Hannan@DanielJHannan·
Remember the murder of Stephen Oake? Perhaps you don’t. It was in the news at the time, but it was nothing like as huge a story as the tragedy of Henry Nowak or the horrible maiming of Stephen Ogilvie in Belfast. There were no marches, no protests, no agonised debates about immigration. Yet the case was, objectively, every bit as significant as the more recent horrors. DC Oake was stabbed to death by Kamel Bourgass, an Algerian national who had arrived in Britain on the back of a lorry three years earlier, and had become radicalised through the terrorist network Al-Muhajiroun. Why wasn’t his death a bigger deal? Oake was a brave man who died in the line of duty. His murderer was an illegal immigrant. There was a religious radicalisation angle. The answer, I think, is that Oake died in 2003, when our media and political leaders did not consider it quite proper to dwell on stories about white men being killed by immigrants. Making too much of a fuss was said to “stoke far-Right narratives”. What we are seeing now is partly the result of decades of repression, deflection and dissembling, a breakdown in trust between the old media and the country at large. That is what makes it so bitter.
Daniel Hannan tweet media
English
68
687
2.4K
49.8K
angloscot retweetet
J Stewart
J Stewart@triffic_stuff_·
Iain Dale left stunned by calm caller on LBC A composed caller named Mike told Iain Dale on LBC that Britain “will remain almost ungovernable until we have mass deportations”. The exchange was striking because the caller spoke in measured tones, clearly articulating a view held by millions of people across the country. Yet Iain struggled to process it, repeatedly falling back on “you can’t do that”. Mike highlighted the obvious disconnect: the British public have consistently voted for lower immigration, only for politicians to deliver record levels instead. “There’s a massive disconnect between the political class and the people of this country,” he said. “We never gave any consent to this and there’s certainly no mandate for the scale of immigration we’ve seen.” When Iain pushed back, saying you can’t deport people here perfectly legally, the caller was unflinching: Caller: “You mean end indefinite leave to remain?” Iain: “You can do that for future people but you can’t do that for people who have already got it. That would be outrageous.” Caller: “Yeah you can. Of course you can.” Iain: “From a fairness point of view, you can’t suddenly tell people who’ve got a perfect legal right to be here that we’re changing the rules now…” Caller: “You can, Iain.” Iain: “Well you can do that but is that really the kind of country you want to live in?” Caller: “Yes!” Iain continued to argue that you can’t “take it out on perfectly legal, law-abiding people”, clearly unable to grasp how widespread this frustration has become. The public didn’t always feel this way. Years of politicians ignoring the public on immigration have shifted attitudes dramatically. As the caller made clear, people never voted for this transformation and the consequences of fixing it now rest with those who created the problem. Well worth a listen. The gap between Westminster and the rest of the country has rarely been clearer.
English
1.5K
5.3K
27.8K
828.2K
angloscot retweetet
Laila Cunningham
Laila Cunningham@policylaila·
Over 40,000 illegal migrants in past 12 months. Top 5 nationalities: Eritrean, Afghan, Sudanese, Iranian, Somali. How many rapists, beheaders, IRGC or Muslim Brotherhood terrorists are now loose among us, all fed, housed and bankrolled by British taxpayers? Spineless governments have betrayed us for years. How many more British girls have to be raped, Brits stabbed or beheaded before they STOP THE BOATS? Genuine question.
English
237
948
4.1K
46.2K
angloscot retweetet
Matt Goodwin
Matt Goodwin@GoodwinMJ·
What becomes immediately clear 48-hours after every atrocity in the UK — the Manchester Islamist bombing, Lee Rigby, David Amess, Southport, Henry Nowak, Belfast — is how drunk the political class is on suicidal empathy. They must always show empathy to minorities and outsiders before displaying any genuine concern for their own people, the majority. To them, you are “far-right”, “toxic”, “divisive”. You are a problem, to be stigmatised, but never to be taken seriously. You can register your dissent, but only to a point. And only so long as it can be managed. Because if you protest, if you genuinely display any righteous anger, then you threaten the entire system, and “the narrative”. And the grievance? It is never to be seriously addressed. Only pushed to one side. It morphs into utterly ridiculous and tangential debates about “social media”, “big tech”, “not looking back in anger”, “reclaiming the flag”, “tolerance”, “diversity”. Anything but the real cause aka Islamism, mass immigration, broken borders. These people have abdicated their responsibility and role as custodians of the nation. They very clearly do not care about you or the country. We are merely an afterthought. An inconvenience to be managed. All they want to do is show empathy to others, to people from outside our community, even if they end up destroying our country from within. And that, ironically, is the road towards all the chaos and division they warn the rest of us about.
English
85
766
3.8K
47.9K
angloscot
angloscot@floppsieian·
@afneil Will those in SW1 and the media who should hold them to account deliver or do we need to rely upon Trump or Vance to expose their lies?
English
0
0
1
51
angloscot retweetet
Andrew Neil
Andrew Neil@afneil·
While we still wait on Labour government defence spending plans (the Defence Investment Plan — DIP) to finance last year’s Strategic Defence Review (SDR), let’s keep in mind these salient points when it eventually appears: 1. The current £28 billion shortfall in defence spending over the next four years has nothing to do with implementing the SDR. The £28 billion is simply what’s needed to meet current defence commitments/plans. 2. So funding for SDR would have to be on top of the £28 billion — which would mean tens of billions more over the next five or so years into the early 2030s. 3. The extra money now being floated as what the government is likely to announce — £13.5 billion over four years — wouldn’t even cover half the shortfall never mind produce a penny for the SDR. It’s a pittance compared with what’s required. 4. We currently spend 2.4% GDP on defence (and even that is boosted by some statistical sleights of hand). The only current concrete plan is to go to 2.5/6% in the next financial year. Now the Treasury is saying it doesn’t even want to set 3% as a target before 2034/35 — by which time if Reeves-Starmer-Treasury have their way we will be a minor player in military matters. 5 This government is dishonest the best of times. I fear we’re about to discover that when it comes to the defence of the realm — its primary duty as a government — it is a serial liar.
English
98
816
2.6K
75.5K
angloscot retweetet
Allison Pearson
Allison Pearson@AllisonPearson·
Government terror adviser says migration “is a national security issue”. So that’s no longer a racist opinion? Just checking for 30 million deeply pissed off people. telegraph.co.uk/news/2026/06/1…
English
110
1.7K
5.5K
41.3K
angloscot retweetet
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧
Jim Chimirie 🇬🇧@JChimirie66677·
.@MatthewStadlen, nobody serious condones the burning of homes or violence against innocent people. That has been said clearly and repeatedly. Peaceful mass non-compliance, sustained public anger expressed through votes, through civic pressure, through the kind of informed public argument that refuses to be silenced, would be far more effective and far more legitimate than disorder. That is the argument worth making. What you deliberately fail to address is why we are here. This didn't happen because of social media. If anything social media has given a voice to millions who were ignored, dismissed and labelled by the very people supposed to be representing them. For thirty years the political and media class controlled the terms of the debate. They decided what could be said, who could say it and what label would be applied to anyone who said the wrong thing. Social media broke that monopoly. The anger you are now describing as dangerous was always there. It was simply not permitted a platform until now. Britain was forged over a millennium. Out of invasion and resistance, reformation and revolution, industrial genius and imperial reach, two world wars and the stubborn refusal to be broken. The people who built that country, who dug its coal, staffed its factories, fought its wars and buried its dead, were never consulted about the transformation of their communities at a speed and scale that their own government now admits was too much, too quickly. When they objected they were called racist. When they persisted they were called far right. When they voted for parties that reflected their concern those parties were dismissed as extremist. The working class communities now erupting with anger are not doing so because of a website. They are doing so because their concerns were ignored for thirty years by people like you, who had the platforms, the education and the proximity to power to raise these questions honestly and chose instead to brand those raising them as bigots. The road to perdition was not paved by the people of Belfast. It was paved by the political and media class that substituted mass migration for economic reform, celebrated the transformation as diversity, prosecuted those who questioned it as racists, and is now, as the consequences arrive, reaching for the same tired accusation one more time. You are not describing a backward ideology. You are describing the consequence of your own class's choices. The difference is that the people in those streets have to live with those consequences. You do not.
English
124
496
1.6K
19.7K