Per Sé
955 posts


@NovajohnsX07 She looks so out of place. Shes beautiful girl. But why are the allowing her to have all these piercings ? She is only 13… 😳
English

HaloBraid raises $7M from Seven Seven Six to end the six-hour hair salon appointment techcrunch.com/2026/06/23/hal… via @techcrunch
English

@Raindropsmedia1 I can’t believe she did that to a pregnant woman. I’m so glad she lost her job. And she assaulted a man after that and has two cases coming up. And the bitch still don’t think she did anything wrong. WTF is wrong with this white bitch?
English

@MissKrisBabyy @RedMedia_us Nope. Julius be with her when her mom ain’t around a lot of the time.
English

@iiCoffs @RedMedia_us Okay, the first thing I thought was where is here security??? Because Blue bodyguard doesn’t play at all.
English

Donald Trump Compares Young Photo of Himself to Teenage Barack Obama tmz.com/2026/06/27/don…
English

@OzorNdiOzor This is appalling. Asians say so much about black Americans, and this is the type of shit they do!?! Disgusting. I’m stuck on having diarrhea and it getting in the shoes, and then bagging it! Disgusting! 🤮
English

@GigglingGanon Wow! The audacity of those pigs. They clearly don’t know the law. I would sue the fuck out of them.
English

Deputy and local PD team up to bully residents of this home refusing to let them close their own door when it's discovered they do not have a search warrant.
Law enforcement officers—including a Lake Hamilton officer and a local sheriff's deputy—show up at a private residence under the assumption that a wanted individual named "TT" (a Black male with an outstanding felony warrant) is hiding inside.
The residents immediately make it clear: The suspect is not there, they do not consent to a search, and they want the officers off their property. In a heavily sarcastic exchange, the residents even point out the obvious irony to the deputy standing on the porch, noting that the only Black male present at the scene is the deputy himself.
Under the Fourth Amendment, the threshold of a home is a sacred boundary. Unless officers possess a search warrant for that specific address, or are dealing with an active emergency ("exigent circumstances"), they cannot legally force their way inside. Recognizing this, the homeowner attempts to terminate the voluntary encounter by pulling the front door shut.
Instead of backing off, an officer physically blocks the door from closing, delivering a swift ultimatum: "If you hit him [with the door], you're going to jail."
The moment the resident attempts to shut his door anyway, the officers push past the threshold. A physical struggle ensues as the drag the man outside placing him under arrest.
The aftermath of this encounter highlights what many critics describe as blatant law enforcement bullying:
The Homeowner: Arrested on the spot and charged with assaulting an officer and resisting arrest—simply for attempting to close his own front door on officers who lacked a search warrant.
The Co-Resident: During the argument, an officer explicitly tells the woman filming to call for a supervisor herself. When she stops recording to dial 911 to get a supervisor to the scene, the officers arrest her as well, slapping her with a charge for "misuse of an emergency number."
Ultimately, the legal system recognized that these charges were completely baseless. All charges against both the man and the woman were completely dropped.
However, despite clear video evidence of the officers escalating the situation, violating the residents' constitutional rights, and utilizing retaliatory arrest tactics, absolutely no disciplinary action was taken against the officers involved.
This is the type of stuff that makes me sick. Qualified immunity does not protect officers that knowingly violate the rights of citizens. Hopefully these people file a lawsuit against the city any county.
Giggling Ganon@GigglingGanon
You think you’ve seen it all on reality TV, but nothing compares to the absolute, unhinged madness that gets caught on police dash cams and body cams when the night shift goes completely off the rails! From high-speed pursuits that look like they belong in a video game to bizarre roadside encounters that defy all logic, the front-row seat to pure adrenaline is right here. Have some exciting ones coming quick and in a hurry.
English

@LRHN_Cash They’re all is wrong. The consumer for expecting assistance with a nasty attitude. The cop for being rude and having an attitude as well. The cop was mad because she wouldn’t answer her questions as she asked them. This is a teachable moment for all. Respect goes 2 ways.
English

Sheriff’s office releases body-cam video after viral arrest at Augusta business
Augusta, GA - Sheriff Gino Brantley and the Richmond County Sheriff’s Office released body-worn camera footage from an incident that led to a woman’s arrest at 3481 Wrightsboro Road.
The sheriff’s office issued the footage and a statement after a video posted to social media began circulating online.
The agency said short clips can show only part of an encounter, and it urged the public to watch the full video before drawing conclusions.
Deputies were called to the business June 19 after employees requested help with a customer, the sheriff’s office said.
Employees reported the woman approached an employee in a threatening manner.
The employee then retreated to an office in an employees-only area, and deputies said the woman followed her into that restricted space.
The sheriff’s office said surveillance video confirmed the woman entered the employees-only area.
The sheriff’s office said the full body-worn camera video shows key moments not captured in the social media clip, including the woman entering the restricted area to continue the confrontation, refusing to leave after being given what deputies described as a lawful order and deputies making multiple attempts to gain voluntary compliance before taking enforcement action.
Under Georgia law, the sheriff’s office said, an arrest may be authorized when someone refuses to obey a lawful command from a law enforcement officer in these circumstances.
However, the agency said officers have discretion, and the deputy “extended grace” by continuing to give her opportunities to comply rather than making an arrest immediately.
The sheriff’s office also addressed questions about why the deputy continued to request the women’s information.
The deputy was the primary deputy assigned to the call and responsible for investigating the complaint, completing the incident report and obtaining information needed to issue a criminal trespass warning, the agency said.
The assisting deputy was not the primary investigating officer, and body-worn camera video shows the assisting deputy encouraging the women to provide her information so the investigation could be completed, the sheriff’s office said.
The agency said it recognizes some viewers believe the woman was trying to explain her side of a dispute involving her vehicle being towed.
The sheriff’s office said the towing was a civil matter between the woman and the business and that deputies were not dispatched to investigate or document the towing itself.
The sheriff’s office said, according to the business, the vehicle remained on the property beyond the time permission had been given and was blocking the fueling area.
The sheriff’s office said businesses generally have the right to have vehicles removed from their property under applicable law, and deputies’ role was to address the reported disturbance and the business’s complaint.
The woman was arrested and charged with criminal trespass and disorderly conduct, the sheriff’s office said.
The sheriff’s office said it reviewed all responding deputies’ body-worn camera footage as part of its investigation and that the footage, business surveillance video and witness statements provide a complete account of what happened.
“Showing empathy for someone’s frustration does not change the fact that lawful commands from law enforcement officers must still be followed,” the sheriff’s office said, adding that it supports the deputy’s actions and believes the video reflects repeated efforts to resolve the incident without an immediate arrest.
English













