Iteractively

@pyjamabrah The 365 days count from the day of buying or after all courses are launched? Else, for those courses, it's actually less than 365 days.

𝗘𝗮𝗿𝗹𝘆 𝗯𝗶𝗿𝗱 𝗼𝗳𝗳𝗲𝗿: Get a 50% off on Firmware Engineering! Use code - REBOOT50 on checkout. Get it here: learn.pyjamabrah.com/learn/fw-eng 𝙲𝚘𝚕𝚕𝚎𝚌𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 𝚘𝚏 𝟷𝟶 𝙲𝚘𝚞𝚛𝚜𝚎𝚜: 𝟷． 𝙻𝚘𝚠 𝙻𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕 𝚠𝚒𝚝𝚑 𝙿𝚢𝚓𝚊𝚖𝚊 𝙱𝚛𝚊𝚑 𝚎𝙱𝚘𝚘𝚔 (𝚙𝚞𝚋𝚕𝚒𝚌 𝚍𝚛𝚊𝚏𝚝) 𝟸． 𝙲 𝙻𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎 - 𝚕𝚊𝚗𝚐𝚞𝚊𝚐𝚎, 𝚝𝚘𝚘𝚕𝚜 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚙𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚗𝚒𝚚𝚞𝚎𝚜 𝟹． 𝙼𝚊𝚜𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝙲 𝙿𝚘𝚒𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚜 - 𝚆𝚊𝚢𝚜 𝚝𝚘 𝚃𝚑𝚒𝚗𝚔 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚋𝚊𝚐 𝚘𝚏 𝚝𝚛𝚒𝚌𝚔𝚜 𝟺． 𝙰𝚁𝙼 𝙼 - 𝚄𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛𝚜𝚝𝚊𝚗𝚍𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝙲𝙿𝚄 𝟻． 𝙲𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚎𝚡-𝙼 𝙲𝙿𝚄 - 𝙿𝚛𝚘𝚐𝚛𝚊𝚖𝚖𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚊 𝚛𝚘𝚞𝚗𝚍 𝚛𝚘𝚋𝚒𝚗 𝚜𝚌𝚑𝚎𝚍𝚞𝚕𝚎𝚛 𝟼． 𝙵𝚛𝚎𝚎𝚁𝚃𝙾𝚂 𝙺𝚎𝚛𝚗𝚎𝚕 - 𝙿𝚘𝚛𝚝𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚏𝚛𝚘𝚖 𝚜𝚌𝚛𝚊𝚝𝚌𝚑 (𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚙𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝) 𝟽． 𝙶𝙽𝚄 𝙼𝚊𝚔𝚎 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝙰𝚞𝚝𝚘𝚖𝚊𝚝𝚒𝚘𝚗 (𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚞𝚙𝚕𝚘𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚍)． 𝟾． 𝙶𝙽𝚄 𝙻𝚒𝚗𝚔𝚎𝚛 𝚂𝚌𝚛𝚒𝚙𝚝 𝙱𝚕𝚊𝚌𝚔 𝙼𝚊𝚐𝚒𝚌 (𝚌𝚘𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚗𝚝 𝚋𝚎𝚒𝚗𝚐 𝚞𝚙𝚕𝚘𝚊𝚍𝚎𝚍)． 𝟿． 𝙶𝚒𝚝 𝚊𝚗𝚍 𝙶𝚎𝚛𝚛𝚒𝚝 (𝚞𝚗𝚍𝚎𝚛 𝚍𝚎𝚟𝚎𝚕𝚘𝚙𝚖𝚎𝚗𝚝)． 𝟷𝟶． 𝙸𝚗𝚝𝚎𝚛𝚟𝚒𝚎𝚠𝚜 - 𝙰𝚌𝚎 𝚝𝚑𝚎 𝚝𝚎𝚌𝚑𝚗𝚒𝚌𝚊𝚕 𝙳𝚒𝚜𝚌𝚞𝚜𝚜𝚒𝚘𝚗𝚜 ----- 𝗜𝗺𝗽𝗼𝗿𝘁𝗮𝗻𝘁: - 𝗟𝗶𝗻𝘂𝘅 𝗱𝗲𝘃𝗶𝗰𝗲 𝗱𝗿𝗶𝘃𝗲𝗿𝘀 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝘄𝗶𝗹𝗹 𝗻𝗼𝘁 𝗯𝗲 𝗮𝗱𝗱𝗲𝗱 𝘁𝗼 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀. - 𝗦𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗯𝗲𝗶𝗻𝗴 𝗿𝗲𝗰𝗼𝗿𝗱𝗲𝗱. - 𝗦𝗼𝗺𝗲 𝗰𝗼𝘂𝗿𝘀𝗲 𝘃𝗶𝗱𝗲𝗼𝘀 𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗮𝘃𝗮𝗶𝗹𝗮𝗯𝗹𝗲 𝗼𝗻 𝗬𝗼𝘂𝗧𝘂𝗯𝗲 𝗮𝘀 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝘆𝗹𝗶𝘀𝘁𝘀. 𝗧𝗵𝗲 𝗯𝘂𝗻𝗱𝗹𝗲 𝘀𝗶𝗺𝗽𝗹𝘆 𝗼𝗿𝗴𝗮𝗻𝗶𝘀𝗲𝘀 𝘁𝗵𝗲𝗺 𝗶𝗻 𝗼𝗻𝗲 𝗽𝗹𝗮𝗰𝗲. - 𝗜𝗳 𝘆𝗼𝘂 𝗯𝗼𝘂𝗴𝗵𝘁 𝗙𝗶𝗿𝗺𝘄𝗮𝗿𝗲 𝗘𝗻𝗴𝗶𝗻𝗲𝗲𝗿'𝘀 𝗔𝗿𝘀𝗲𝗻𝗮𝗹 𝗶𝗻 𝘁𝗵𝗲 𝗽𝗮𝘀𝘁. 𝗬𝗼𝘂 𝘀𝗵𝗼𝘂𝗹𝗱 𝘀𝗸𝗶𝗽 𝘁𝗵𝗶𝘀.

@justinskycak @pilpulon What if we are reading a theory book that doesn't have problems? Should we create our own problems? Isn't this somewhat like creating flashcards?

@pilpulon I don't think you need flashcards so much as exercises. Consume information, then retrieve it to solve problems. Then solve problems again after some time has passed. I don't know of any subject that doesn't have natural exercises like that.

It might seem like note-taking is a good use of time since it produces (slightly) more retention than purely reading/listening. But that's only if you ignore the opportunity cost: the extra time you spend writing notes could be put to far better use engaging in retrieval practice, which produces a comparatively massive retention benefit.

@ymmotrojam Molinism incorporates middle knowledge in the model and becomes the best explanation that is most compatible with the whole Bible.

Only a Calvinist could say "all Israel will be saved" (Romans 11:26), referring to that future generation of ethnic Israel right before the return of Christ. This would require irresistible grace.

@ymmotrojam Contradictions as God being responsible for evil while being all Good (negating free will) or God not being able to truly determine the future while being all knowing and all powerful (negating sovereignty).

@ymmotrojam Calvinism preserves God sovereignty but at the cost of human free will. Both concepts are found in the Bible many times, and negation of either leads to contradictions.

@ymmotrojam This is what differentiates Arminianism from Molinism. The former preserves free will but can't explain how God remains sovereign. Because with Foreknowledge God only knows the future, but has no way to control it.

@ymmotrojam This is possible because God knows how each human will freely choose to act in any circumstance. By acting on this knowledge, He can remain sovereign by realizing a world where the free actions of his creatures are perfectly aligned in a way that lead to his perfect purpose.

@ymmotrojam If you think God actively wanted it to be that way, then you would need middle knowledge. He choose to create, between many possible worlds, the specific one where people born there at that time all will freely choose salvation.

@ymmotrojam Not even middle knowledge would be needed for this. Only simple Arminian Foreknowledge would be enough for God to know this future and predict it.