Jason Doctor

18.5K posts

Jason Doctor banner
Jason Doctor

Jason Doctor

@jasndoc

Norman Topping Chair in Medicine & Public Policy, USC, Sol Price School of Public Policy

Los Angeles, CA Beigetreten Ağustos 2014
1.9K Folgt2K Follower
Khoa Vu
Khoa Vu@KhoaVuUmn·
With small N you don't even need to sleep for 6 hours.
Khoa Vu tweet media
English
3
6
173
10.5K
Jason Doctor
Jason Doctor@jasndoc·
@KeithNHumphreys I knew your wife Lorraine. She was always cold and wearing winter clothes even in the summer. I wan't to know, have you ever seen Lorraine, wearing down on a sunny day?
English
0
0
1
92
Keith Humphreys
Keith Humphreys@KeithNHumphreys·
Wanted to date Claire Lee but was afraid my wife Lorraine would find out. But she just moved out! I can see Clare Lee now Lorraine has gone.
English
5
1
19
2K
Jason Doctor
Jason Doctor@jasndoc·
@arpitrage Set up incentives to have them compete for the lowest number of "qualifying " absences (where qualifying means no doctor's note, no car accident report etc...)
English
1
0
1
90
Arpit Gupta
Arpit Gupta@arpitrage·
This is the weird part of administrative bloat, from the faculty perspective It would be one thing if all the administrators were doing things to facilitate teaching and research. Instead there are a lot of people, doing various other things, while we do the teaching + research?
English
1
1
95
7.2K
Arpit Gupta
Arpit Gupta@arpitrage·
Proposal: there should be a University-wide office whose job it is to manage student absences. If you have a good reason for being absent, you talk to them; and they inform the relevant faculty (passively through some dashboard) what students have good reasons to be gone.
English
46
14
384
91.5K
Jason Doctor retweetet
John Horton
John Horton@johnjhorton·
John Horton tweet media
ZXX
2
8
66
5.2K
Jason Doctor
Jason Doctor@jasndoc·
This is an important paper. One concern with the "good news" is if a researcher makes a sequence of choices that produce a significant result, then the code and the result are reproducible. That is: reproducibility "stands on the shoulders" of researcher degrees of freedom.
I4R@I4Replication

🧵1/ Our first meta-science paper (with 350+ coauthors) is published today in Nature. It presents one of the largest-ever reproducibility projects in economics & political science. Here’s what we found 👇

English
1
0
4
510
Jason Doctor
Jason Doctor@jasndoc·
The *real* dirty little secret is that all the math in social sciences (psychology, economics, sociology) comes from Math PhDs! These are people like Duncan Luce, Gerard Debreu, and John von Neumann. Sorry, but that is the truth. There is no "better math".
talmon joseph smith@talmonsmith

"The dirty little secret is that what distinguishes economics as a field, right now, is a mix of higher standards, harder work, better math, and higher IQs" is very much something an economist would say

English
0
0
3
424
Jason Doctor
Jason Doctor@jasndoc·
@ben_golub @MatthewGNagler Under EU, adding then subtracting $k wealth from all outcomes cancels; only final wealth matters. Under PT, the reference point shifts, so preferences depend on gains and losses. Nematode neurons encode change relative to a current reference, r, firing tracks deviations from r.
English
0
0
2
180
Ben Golub
Ben Golub@ben_golub·
@MatthewGNagler i must be missing something obvious, but how can these things be different?
English
3
0
5
2.8K
Jason Doctor retweetet
Matthew G Nagler
Matthew G Nagler@MatthewGNagler·
Nematodes’ brains induce them not to move in the direction of food smells, but to move in the direction in which food smells *increase* We are neurologically wired for reference dependence. It’s amazing it took economists so long to figure out that utility works in this way.
Matthew G Nagler tweet media
English
4
4
27
5.9K
Ilya Sergey
Ilya Sergey@ilyasergey·
Are paper rejections really that bad? My papers get read by ~3 people on average. Each rejection means a resubmission, which means 3 more readers. After 4 rejections, that's double-digit readership.
English
46
162
3.8K
174.3K
Jason Doctor
Jason Doctor@jasndoc·
This was tweeted about the time the statistical paradises paper came out showing with random sampling you do not need large N. I often wonder if he meant random sampling, but my recollection was that he meant causal claims.
Khoa Vu@KhoaVuUmn

This was peak econ twitter.

English
0
0
0
169
Jason Doctor retweetet
Jeff Jenkins
Jeff Jenkins@jaj7d·
Tenure-track job alert: Assistant Professor of Public Policy and Management at the Price School. Review of applications is happening immediately. Hope to have fly outs in about a month. (I'm on the committee.) See here: usccareers.usc.edu/job/los-angele…
English
0
23
58
10.7K
Jason Doctor
Jason Doctor@jasndoc·
@ben_golub "Often progress has to be made not by adding more theories but by deleting some assumptions." Psychology: Adds more theories Economics: Refuses to delete assumptions
English
0
0
3
770
Jason Doctor
Jason Doctor@jasndoc·
@KeithNHumphreys They've got a lot of perspectives to cover, even in one relationship. I think it makes sense.
English
0
0
2
654
Keith Humphreys
Keith Humphreys@KeithNHumphreys·
BREAKING: The number of journalists writing about polyamory has now surpassed the number of people engaging in it. Congratulations to all.
English
50
255
4.2K
332.3K
Jason Doctor
Jason Doctor@jasndoc·
I firmly believe someone invented "Box 1" because they did not want to renumber all their tables.
English
0
0
1
110
Jason Doctor retweetet
Jon Hartley
Jon Hartley@Jon_Hartley_·
9/ Sims was also early to behavioral macroeconomics; see "Implications of Rational Inattention" (JME, 2003) — one of his most cited and creative contributions. Sims modeled agents as having limited information-processing capacity, not just limited information. This spawned an entire literature on how attention constraints shape macroeconomic dynamics. Basic intuition: people can't process everything happening in the economy; agents optimize how to allocate their attention & this has profound implications for price-setting, consumption, and why monetary policy works through expectations in subtle ways
Jon Hartley tweet media
English
1
9
68
62.1K
Jason Doctor
Jason Doctor@jasndoc·
@KeithNHumphreys Also HR for HIV (a success) does not map completely to opioids. E.g., condom use is not a "near fatal miss" the same way naloxone is. With condom use learning has already happened--you've updated risk appraisal. Naloxone can mean learning didn't happen and someone saved you.
English
0
0
1
34
Keith Humphreys
Keith Humphreys@KeithNHumphreys·
Harm reduction started in the 1980s when HIV was infinitely more deadly than opioid (heroin) use, so stopping the latter was de-prioritized to prevent the former. Today HIV is completely treatable and opioid use (fentanyl) is deadlier than ever. Need to update thinking to match.
English
14
29
198
18.1K