Jimmy Nicholls

14.3K posts

Jimmy Nicholls

Jimmy Nicholls

@jdenicholls

Politics punditry. Podcast @RightDishonour. Contributions @spectator @unherd @TheCriticMag @CapX

London Beigetreten Şubat 2009
726 Folgt893 Follower
Andrew Doyle
Andrew Doyle@andrewdoyle_com·
@jdenicholls @TheCriticMag Oh, I see. It read as though you were claiming I was gloating over the death of woke, rather than warning than it hadn’t yet gone away and would in any case likely recur in another form…
English
1
0
0
13
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
@andrewdoyle_com @TheCriticMag Hi Andrew. I was quoting Lynskey's point about the title of your book rather than the contents, though I can see why it may have been unclear what I meant. I've contacted the editor and he's removed the reference to your book to clarify things.
English
1
0
0
25
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
The major flaw in such criticisms of the bullshit jobs thesis is in assuming that because such roles might conceivably be necessary that they are necessary. Much compliance for the sake of compliance
Chasing Ennui@rwlesq

A major flaw in the “Bullshit Jobs” thesis is confusing “adversarial” with “unnecessary.” Many adversarial roles appear zero- or even negative-sum at the micro level, but are positive-sum at the macro level. Litigation, compliance, auditing, and other apparently zero-sum activities often provide the enforcement, information, and deterrence that make rule-of-law and market institutions possible. A breach-of-contract suit is usually negative-sum for the parties in that one case. But a world in which contracts cannot be credibly enforced is far worse. The same is true of many forms of institutional friction: they look like deadweight if you isolate the transaction, but they are part of the scaffolding that lets the larger system function. Adversarial systems generate information, constrain discretion, and reduce corruption in ways that are easy to miss if you look only at the immediate transaction. Central planning rested in part on the assumption that many such adversarial processes were wasteful and could be replaced by administrative decision-making. That proved disastrous: you lose the information generated by decentralized contestation and create enormous room for corruption by the people making the decisions. Graeber’s mistake was often Chesterton’s Fence: seeing a role whose purpose was not immediately obvious to him and inferring that it therefore had no purpose. Maybe some jobs really are padded or performative, but many others exist because they form the scaffolding that keeps the systems running.

English
0
0
0
29
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
@MichaelMcGough3 Haha, yes. I probably read too much news so some of these stand out to me too, but it is certainly easier when you're not committed to a side
English
0
0
1
7
Michael McGough
Michael McGough@MichaelMcGough3·
@jdenicholls I think if you don’t care about the pros and cons of the Iran war you might more easily pick up on rhetorical gimmicks like “Don’t get me wrong. I’m glad that the ayatollah is gone.”
English
1
0
1
23
Michael McGough
Michael McGough@MichaelMcGough3·
Much as comedians can capture the sound of a language they don't speak, readers who are indifferent to the issues discussed in opinion pieces are better able to discern the author's rhetorical tics.
English
1
0
0
46
Henry Jeffreys is working on a new book
Someone has just waded into the Patrick O'Brian Facebook group saying how terrible the Master & Commander film is. It's not going well.
English
8
3
46
3.4K
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
There's a respect for empiricism and then there's refusing to believe there's a correlation between hand-eye co-ordination and being good at darts
George Simms@GeorgeRSimms

@soag_69 Part of my point is that we have no real understanding of the correlation between hand-eye and darting success. It’s far more about psychology than physiology to my mind.

English
0
1
2
78
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
@TomABacon @NadimJBaba I do believe that there should be safe routes for refugees, but I don't think that number should be unlimited, and if you're prioritising need you're hardly going to take people who have already made it to France. So boats will keep coming unless physically stopped
English
1
0
0
7
Tom Bacon
Tom Bacon@TomABacon·
@jdenicholls @NadimJBaba Tell you what, create safe routes for refugees then. That way small boats will drop to near-zero and the problem will be solved.
English
1
0
1
14
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
Why would it matter that small boats only made up 5% of immigration to the UK? Would it matter if it was 20%? 50%? Seems disingenuous if your preference is close to open borders anyway
Zoe Gardner@ZoeJardiniere

Fun fact

English
7
2
13
5.6K
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
@WaistcoatDave @ZoeJardiniere It was a £350 million pledge made by Vote Leave, so Dominic Cummings, Michael Gove and Boris Johnson. If we're being rigorous about facts, of course
English
1
0
0
20
Waistcoat Dave
Waistcoat Dave@WaistcoatDave·
@jdenicholls @ZoeJardiniere Oh it's undoubtable that people are talking about it. But the promises that parties are making off the back of that concern is where the problem is It's like the whole "250 million to the NHS" promise Farage made around Brexit... Lies & misdirects they later deny
English
1
0
0
16
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
@NadimJBaba @TomABacon The answer is that irregular arrivals by small boats are undesirable whatever percentage of migration they account for
English
1
0
0
19
Nadim Baba
Nadim Baba@NadimJBaba·
@TomABacon @jdenicholls I reckon Jimmy knew the answer to his question. I mean, the other explanation is he's usually thick, but I actually think he knew.
English
3
0
2
24
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
@WaistcoatDave @ZoeJardiniere If the Labour cabinet are talking about the issue, it's quite likely that people are really concerned about it, even if you don't think they should be
English
1
0
0
18
Waistcoat Dave
Waistcoat Dave@WaistcoatDave·
@jdenicholls Of course it matters, for the simple reason that the promises being made by most UK parties, spurred on by the far right, will actually have a limited impact on markers that are really concerning citizens - cost of living, funding of NHS, housing. @ZoeJardiniere is spot on
English
2
0
4
49
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
@Itmustbetues As a matter of fact, the press do not spend 95% of their time talking about small boats
English
1
0
0
23
If the apocalypse comes, beep me
@jdenicholls It matters because facts matter, and it’s important that people know actual facts And you’d never know this particular fact from listening to press and pundits who seem to spend 95% of their time talking about small boats as if it’s the biggest problem in UK today It’s not
English
2
0
5
66
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
@ZoeJardiniere I don't worry about it much, to be honest, but it does seem undesirable from any angle
English
0
0
0
33
Zoe Gardner
Zoe Gardner@ZoeJardiniere·
@jdenicholls Might just be an idea to unbunch your knickers and keep things in perspective, I duno 🤷‍♀️
English
8
5
277
3.2K
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
@HenryGJeffreys @fitzfromdublin Men do care how they are thought of, but more in a "fuck you" kind of way, so negativity is likelier to spur them to lose weight. And of course men bond by insulting each other, which is less true of women
English
1
0
0
10
Jimmy Nicholls
Jimmy Nicholls@jdenicholls·
@HenryGJeffreys @fitzfromdublin Reminds me of the fat guy at an old publication of mine who took issue with Kate Moss's "infamous" remark that nothing tastes as good as skinny feels. Part of this is that some (most?) people, and more often women, struggle with being negatively judged by randos
English
1
0
0
15