Jon Rauh

1.9K posts

Jon Rauh banner
Jon Rauh

Jon Rauh

@jonrauh

Commercial Real Estate Brokerage. Wisconsin sports fan | Packers | Brewers | Bucks | Badgers |

Milwaukee, WI Beigetreten Ocak 2013
716 Folgt365 Follower
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@FoulTerritoryTV @Ken_Rosenthal Lmao just speeds over the fact a small market hasn’t won in 10+ years 😂 As a brewer fan, we are built to win a lot games, however that is with super young players and insane depth. STARS win in October. Don’t need a Cap, but rev sharing is needed at a minimum
English
0
0
3
63
Foul Territory
Foul Territory@FoulTerritoryTV·
Saying baseball is broken "drives me crazy," says @Ken_Rosenthal. "The system isn't perfect, but does it need a salary cap that could cost us games in 2027 to be rectified? I will always believe the answer is no."
English
175
60
546
157.7K
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@SalD9786 @PhilMackey have fun with Freddie. Crazy that y’all are going to dump him before the deadline. We’ll take him back for our playoff push 😂😂
English
1
0
0
6
Phil Mackey 🎙
Phil Mackey 🎙@PhilMackey·
The MLB owners nailed this proposal. 100%. A fairly wide cap gap (245m cap / 171m floor) + consolidation and revenue sharing of local + national TV. Top teams still have ability to spend ~70m more than the bottom feeders. But strategic roster building matters more across the league w/ cap structure. And MLB player salaries will continue to rise. This cap structure will also create a free agency frenzy window in the off-season like we have never seen before (like NFL, NBA, NHL have) — because teams and players will feel pressure to get deals done before cap $$ dries up! A fun week for fans to lean into. And for MLB to own. Bravo. Players, get on board.
Evan Drellich@EvanDrellich

MLBPA interim executive director Bruce Meyer statement on MLB's cap proposal: "The last time the owners made such an explicit push for a cap—over 30 years ago—it led to the longest work stoppage in MLB history. For generations, our members have fought against cap systems..."

English
249
76
985
388.9K
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@andersonjake188 @BrewerSooner It’s 20-20 hindsight that some of those guys declined or got injured after we were forced to trade them… I agree I’m glad we made all those moves. But the likelihood that all those guys would fall off is super low…. And you’re going to be better off paying your stud players
English
0
0
0
20
Jake
Jake@andersonjake188·
@jonrauh @BrewerSooner When in the past would the Brewers have even benefited from extending their guys though? They are damn better off having not extended Burnes/Peralta/Adames/Williams etc. than if they would have for a price reasonably less than they signed for anyways.
English
4
0
0
22
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@andersonjake188 @BrewerSooner Brewers are still going to develop PLUS can spend more, I’m failing to see how that would hurt them? I’m more worried about competing financially with the coastal teams when it comes playoff time, dodgers, Phillies, braves, Mets, etc
English
0
0
0
37
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@andersonjake188 @BrewerSooner No salary caps put a huge emphasis on young talent and paying money to a handful of star players. Every team in the nfl or nba that is a true title contender has a mix of stud star players plus a core of guys on rookie contracts and it’ll be the same in the mlb
English
0
0
1
28
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@AJGullotta @PhilMackey Dodgers tv deal is $334m per year. The brewers is $35m per year…. You don’t see the problem here? Ridiculous the league allowed this to go on as long as it did. There’s a reason why the NFL is king
English
0
0
0
28
Anthony Joseph (AJ) Gullotta II 🇮🇹
Anthony Joseph (AJ) Gullotta II 🇮🇹@AJGullotta·
Can’t wait for this fuckin retard to watch the Brewers to still refuse to spend money and still spend less than the Dodgers because the non existence of a salary cap never had a single fuckin thing to do with competitive balance. The Brewers owner doesn’t give enough fucks about winning to spend. Guess what? He still won’t even with a salary cap.
English
1
0
2
72
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@itd0esntmatter2 @PhilMackey There’s going to be a media revenue share as part of this deal, so you’re completely wrong that’s not what this proposal “admits” at all. Dodgers tv deal is $334m per year. The brewers is $35m per year…. You don’t see the problem here?
English
1
0
0
48
Jimbo
Jimbo@itd0esntmatter2·
@jonrauh @PhilMackey tigers fan and I hate it. Every "poor" owner could spend more they just don't and the owners own proposal admits this. The game is nothing without the players and the fans. The owners don't even pay for their stadiums they make the fans subsidize them. If you can't pay, sell
English
1
0
0
73
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@SalD9786 @PhilMackey Oh look another Mets fan 😂😂 I’d be worried too considering yall can’t even compete with a $368m payroll lmao.
English
1
0
0
35
mets8697
mets8697@SalD9786·
@jonrauh @PhilMackey Feel like these gotta be owner bot accounts the players proposal was way better and had a floor only 20 million less. The owners can spend they just don’t want to blame the owners
English
1
0
0
69
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@BigBillyMazza @PhilMackey Lmao imagine how much better than the Mets well be when our payrolls are within 100m of each other 😂😂😂😂
English
0
0
0
55
Dodgers Andrew
Dodgers Andrew@DodgersAndrew·
1) LOLOLOLOLOLOLOL 2) $171M is like 2x+ some of the lowest payroll teams. How are they going to meet that? 3) $254M cap is weak. There’s no way this is going to be accepted.
Jesse Rogers@JesseRogersESPN

BREAKING: As expected, MLB proposed a hard salary cap to union officials today as part of the next CBA, sources tell ESPN. The salary floor for teams beginning in 2027 would be set at $171.2 million which includes player benefits with the ceiling at $245.3 million.

English
116
4
70
62.7K
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@AustonWhite3 @PhilMackey Well I didn’t think I’d have to list off all the huge spenders to make my point… but Toronto, Boston, and Philly fans also won’t like it, there are you happy now? 😂
English
2
0
4
179
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@B_R_O_L_E_G @SteveBread @BNightengale Not true at all. The cap system would likely also shorten rookie contracts and arbitration, and allow players to hit FA sooner. If anything there will be much more demand considering there will be 20+ teams that have never participated in free agency now signing players early
English
0
0
0
11
Broлег
Broлег@B_R_O_L_E_G·
@SteveBread @BNightengale All players. Every single player doesn’t want a cap as it eliminates a free market of supply and demand salaries and takes $ out of their pockets. Not arguing - providing perspective.
English
1
0
2
112
Bob Nightengale
Bob Nightengale@BNightengale·
The union’s response
Bob Nightengale tweet media
English
149
113
531
167.4K
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@YGJAPanda @DMMP15 @BNightengale So you’d rather have 5 teams negotiate with all the top players essentially forcing them to take lower deals cause there’s no competitive market? There’s nothing good about that Half the players shouldn’t have to wait until a few weeks before spring training to sign in FA
English
1
0
0
14
Bob Nightengale
Bob Nightengale@BNightengale·
The MLB salary cap proposal is at $245.3 million, meaning that 8 clubs would have to reduce payroll by a combined $578 million: The Dodgers, Mets, Yankees, Blue Jays, Phillies, Red Sox, Padres and Atlanta.
English
711
351
3.9K
1M
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@YGJAPanda @DMMP15 @BNightengale Uhh yeah it is? The entire point of sports is entertainment, nothing more. More teams having to spend money = players making more money. It’s a pretty simple concept. Guessing rookie contracts will be shorter allowing guys to hit FA sooner as well
English
1
0
0
15
panda
panda@YGJAPanda·
@jonrauh @DMMP15 @BNightengale Let’s not act like you don’t know what you meant by “free agency period” like the nfl and nba. Where they give like 1 or 2 weeks to focus on free agency negotiations . The offseason isn’t for our entertainment. Players contract negotiations isn’t for our entertainment.
English
1
0
0
14
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@andersonjake188 @BrewerSooner Completely disagree. Brewers could actually retain their top end guys (Contreras/ turang) and spreading out the other top end guys will definitely help us. If betts was on Miami, freeman As, and snell the Rays … the brewers would have a MUCH better shot at winning a WS
English
1
0
1
44
Jake
Jake@andersonjake188·
@BrewerSooner In other words, it’s not that much worse for the Brewers if the Dodgers have Betts/Ohtani/Freeman/Yamamoto all on one team as opposed to those players being spread out on teams like the Pirates/Reds etc.
English
2
0
0
75
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@StoolBaseball @ChrisKlemmer A Mets fan upset that his team can’t spend 100m more than 3/4 of the league? 😂 the salary cap/ floor will be a net positive for the players. The only people that can’t seem to rationalize this are from LA and NY
English
0
0
1
149
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@YGJAPanda @DMMP15 @BNightengale Well they already have a free agency period? Lmao except the majority of the players don’t sign for 3 months because there is 5 teams signing all the top guys. If all 30 teams could/ have to spend…all the top free agents will get signed in the first week
English
1
0
0
27
panda
panda@YGJAPanda·
@jonrauh @DMMP15 @BNightengale MLB doesn’t need a cap nor does it need a “free agency period”. They already tried this in ‘94 and the players went on strike.
English
1
0
1
22
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@JesseRogersESPN The only people that think this is a bad thing are from LA and NY, every other fan likes this. And frankly it’ll increase the total number of players actually getting paid due to the amount of teams well under the floor. free agency will actually be interesting
English
0
0
4
137
Jesse Rogers
Jesse Rogers@JesseRogersESPN·
BREAKING: As expected, MLB proposed a hard salary cap to union officials today as part of the next CBA, sources tell ESPN. The salary floor for teams beginning in 2027 would be set at $171.2 million which includes player benefits with the ceiling at $245.3 million.
English
1.1K
1.3K
11.5K
8.3M
Jon Rauh
Jon Rauh@jonrauh·
@DMMP15 @BNightengale This will make the majority of teams spend more money which will be a net positive for the players. Will also lead to an actual Free agency period like the nba/ nfl, cause what the MLB has now is a joke
English
1
0
0
43
dmmp
dmmp@DMMP15·
@BNightengale If I were the players. I'd feel disrespected with this ridiculous of a proposal. Sure the players suggestion was high and asking for a lot. But this is straight up ridiculous and disrespectful.
English
5
0
2
915

Entdecken

@FoulTerritoryTV @Ken_Rosenthal @SalD9786 @PhilMackey @andersonjake188 @BrewerSooner @AJGullotta @itd0esntmatter2