ksachdeva

133 posts

ksachdeva

ksachdeva

@ksachdeva

Beigetreten Mart 2008
248 Folgt163 Follower
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
@docmilanfar For me first understanding SSM (the model) and then Bayesian view on filtering and seeing Kalman filter an “algo” for LGSSM (model) was useful. I explain it here - youtu.be/-DiZGpAh7T4?si…
YouTube video
YouTube
English
0
4
13
1.5K
Peyman Milanfar
Peyman Milanfar@docmilanfar·
The Kalman Filter was once a core topic in EECS curricula. Given it's relevance to ML, RL, Ctrl/Robotics, I'm surprised that most researchers don't know much about it, and many papers just rediscover it. KF seems messy & complicated, but the intuition behind it is invaluable 1/4
Peyman Milanfar tweet media
English
28
225
1.6K
756K
Eiko Fried
Eiko Fried@EikoFried·
@rlmcelreath I still struggle w “random variable”. It’s such a stupid term.
English
4
0
7
0
Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛
Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛@rlmcelreath·
There is no scientific context in which the term “random” helps to clarify. It is a devil word.
English
18
12
169
0
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
An in-depth explanation of challenges and one potential remedy for gradient estimation in stochastic computational graphs youtu.be/nKM9875PVtU
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
0
3
0
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
Variational Autoencoder, Latent Variable Model & Amortized Inference... youtu.be/h9kWaQQloPk
YouTube video
YouTube
Català
0
0
5
0
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
@BecomingDataSci A series of YouTube tutorials on Bayesian regression & inference. So far 9 videos and many more to come. youtube.com/playlist?list=… . An attempt to cover both the intuition and underlying mathematics. 🙏
English
0
0
2
0
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
@rlmcelreath .. students admire & love you back for all the wisdom you grant.
English
0
0
0
0
Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛
Richard McElreath 🐈‍⬛@rlmcelreath·
Things I do not do often enough: 1. inflate my bicycle tires 2. descale my de'longhi 3. call my mom 4. remind you that I made 20 hours of free bayes stats (really anti-stats) lectures because i love you #calendar--topical-outline" target="_blank" rel="nofollow noopener">github.com/rmcelreath/sta…
English
16
107
690
0
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
A visual introduction to Rejection Sampling! Full tutorial on YouTube youtu.be/si76S7QqxTU
YouTube video
YouTube
GIF
English
1
0
2
0
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
Published a video explaining "MADE: Masked Autoencoder for Distribution Estimation" youtu.be/7q4ueFiJjAY MADE is an essential component in many modern Normalizing Flows algorithms
YouTube video
YouTube
English
2
0
3
0
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
Published a comprehensive tutorial on Normalizing Flows - Motivations, The Big Idea, & Essential Foundations youtu.be/IuXU2dBOJyw
YouTube video
YouTube
English
1
0
2
0
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
@jeremyphoward The complexity/Simplicity of a language is a function of how it is taught and the domain for which it is designed! E.g. Your fastai effort makes the complex subject of ML relatively simpler. So what is the problem - language or the teachers :)
English
0
0
0
0
Jeremy Howard
Jeremy Howard@jeremyphoward·
Are there any universities that do their intro coding courses in #golang? I know that Python is very popular, but it's a huge, complex, and (delightfully!) idiosyncratic language. Go, OTOH, is small, simple, and (delightfully!) boring.
English
21
10
158
0
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
@willkurt IMHO reason great libraries got written in python are because of domain expertise & not because language is superior. Refactoring/updates/performance/lack of tests are real issues in any industrial code & python makes my heart stop because of lack of strong typing and tools.
English
0
0
0
0
Will Kurt
Will Kurt@willkurt·
@ksachdeva My concern is precisely with the idea dynamic typing is a flaw that "needs bandaging". It is an important language feature. You make not care about the language, but it is because of those merits that so many great scientific libraries are written in dynamically typed languages.
English
1
0
0
0
Will Kurt
Will Kurt@willkurt·
I will always feel ambivalent about types in Python. I do think they are a useful documentation tool, but dynamic typing makes a language fundamentally different than static typing. If you want strong, static typing choose one of the many languages that support this by design.
Thomas Wiecki@twiecki

Controversial take: Types in a Python code-base are a net negative. They make code less readable, they give the illusion of productivity while adding them, and in my experience they never helped uncover a single bug.

English
2
0
17
0
ksachdeva
ksachdeva@ksachdeva·
@smdiehl @willkurt If you take inspiration from JavaScript community then it can be done. Many JavaScript libraries did manage to have type definitions. It is about the community effort... seems most of the python developers still do not appreciate the importance of type annotations.
English
0
0
0
0
Stephen Diehl
Stephen Diehl@smdiehl·
@willkurt Not surprising that bolting a very limited type system on top of a overtly dynamic language doesn't really pay dividends in terms of developer productivity. I don't even think it's possible to add types to a library like Django or Pandas without crazy research.
English
2
2
7
0
ksachdeva retweetet
Peter Kolchinsky
Peter Kolchinsky@PeterKolchinsky·
If you are hearing about #covid19 “reinfections” in Asia, I can offer you my take as a virologist. The best explanation for what we’re seeing is likely due to three things...
English
449
11.1K
24.5K
0