Los Angeles Thrifter

It’s super lonely on the top @jessmachadoshow

@Moo_does_drugs Jealous of what ? She doesn’t own a house… she talks online and begs for $$ … she’s extremely overweight… her hubby seems like a looosah …. Umm no I’m good with my life

Jake's moooooochado space clip #1

This is honestly wild. Let's start with the part people keep glossing over....so pay attention, this is important....... a judge DOES NOT allow a third-party culprit defense just because the defense "feels like it." Or because they want to blame someone else....oh no, no, no!! A judge has to determine there is actual EVIDENCE... not speculation.... that reasonably connects a third party to the crime and could create reasonable doubt. The defense doesn't have to prove those people did it, but there must be a REAL, EVIDENTIARY BASIS to even bring it up!!!!! That standard was met in COMMONWEALTH VS READ Trial #1. And judge Beverly Cannone allowed it. Period. Which means Jennifer McCabe, Colin Albert, Chris Albert, Brian Albert, and Brian Higgins were literally placed into the case as potential third-party culprits in open court. That is a courtroom FACT!!!! Once that happens in a very public trial like this one, public scrutiny is not only predictable..... it's unavoidable!!!! Trials are public by design. Testimony, theories, and evidence don't just go away because someone doesn't like the attention that follows....let's be real. Now let's talk about what defamation actually is..... because clearly that word is being thrown around incorrectly even by the McAlbertiggins attorney. Defamation requires a FALSE STATEMENT OF FACT, stated as fact (not opinion), made with the required level of fault, that causes reputational harm. Truth is a complete defense. Commentary on matters of public concern is protected. Talking about what happened in court, analyzing testimony, pointing out inconsistencies, or criticizing behavior raised during a trial is not defamation just because it's unflattering OR HURTS SOMEONES FEELINGS.. @DoctorTurtleboy didnt "make this up." @kreadisinnocent didn't create this scenerio...and they sure as shit didn't conspire to defame the McAlbertiggins. They were QUITE LITERALLY THE THIRD PARTY CULPRITS IN THE DEATH OF JOHN OKEEFE!!!! The third-party culprit theory came from the courtroom.....not Turtleboy’s social media. Commentary followed the case because the case itself opened the door for that commentary. That's why the lawsuit against Aidan Kearney and Karen Read looks, to many people, less like a legitimate defamation claim and more like retaliation for speaking out and bringing national attention to what already occurred in open court. You don't get to retroactively silence public discussion of a public trial by filing a civil suit. Once you are identified as potential third-party culprits in a public proceeding, you don't get immunity from criticism, scrutiny, or media attention. You get exactly what you got. That's how transparency works. You're free to disagree with commentary. You're not free to redefine the law or redefine your roles in Trial #1 and the death of John O'Keefe. Just because you say something, doesn't make it true. And just because you don't like what someone says doesn't make it deformation. At some point, doubling down just makes things worse. People are paying attention, and they understand the difference between lies and lawful public discussion. Public trials invite public debate..... and i hate to break it to you McCabes, Alberts, and Higgins....that's NOT defamation. That's reality. #thirdpartyculprits #antislap