Michael Malchak
1.1K posts





As I said on the pod this week, the Trump 2.0 agenda has taken a backseat to the chaotic Trump 1.0 agenda that no one wants a repeat of. President Trump’s ratings are now worse than Season six of the Apprentice. SAD! Time to refocus on what matters. THANK YOU FOR YOUR ATTENTION TO THIS MATTER!


if you REALLY want to stop worrying and enjoy the next three years, remind yourself that Trump is a NY democrat who took over the Republican Party — then filled it with a bunch of New York, moderate democrats who crushed it in the private sector. The GOP is virtually identical to Clinton’s Democratic Party — and @TheDemocrats are socialist lunatics




🏌🏾One of the best shots of Tiger’s career 🐅🔥




The thing about an income tax is that it literally just makes it a pain to succeed. A consumption tax makes it a pain to consume things you don't need. BIG difference. In a consumption tax-heavy environment, when people are tight on money, they can simply do what any rational person does: buy less "wants," buy only necessities. In an INCOME tax-heavy environment, it doesn't matter. You lose a flat 15-30% of your income. It doesn't matter how smart or purposeful you are with your money. The government just swipes it away. Then, it essentially throws it into a black hole. And the REAL problem, and why the elites DON'T want a system based on tariffs and domestic consumption taxes? They encourage self sufficiency. You don't pay taxes on potatoes and peppers growing in your garden. You can take steps to eliminate purchases, or the prices of the things you do buy by shopping smartly, thus lowering your taxes, while having more money. Consumption based taxes, taken to their logical end, would mean a government that physically cannot be as bloated as it is now while still remaining even somewhat solvent.










