Angehefteter Tweet
$Openlie
CA: 8RFoNyED7nx8LCS2mAehsocGqViZUsHb784KUA9UD6p2
DogeDesigner@cb_doge
Openlie
39 posts
Openlie
@openlieofficial
CA: 8RFoNyED7nx8LCS2mAehsocGqViZUsHb784KUA9UD6p2
Beigetreten Aralık 2025
3 Folgt145 Follower
I get the optimism, but I think calling Agents SDK 2.0 “underrated” overlooks some real downsides.
The complexity curve is still pretty steep—building and maintaining reliable agents requires significant orchestration, debugging, and monitoring overhead. It’s not trivial for smaller teams. There’s also the issue of unpredictability: even with improvements, agents can behave inconsistently in edge cases, which makes production use risky.
Cost is another factor. Running multi-step agent workflows can scale expenses quickly compared to simpler, deterministic solutions. And in many cases, a well-designed pipeline or traditional automation still outperforms agents in reliability and clarity.
It’s promising tech, no doubt—but I’d argue it’s still overhyped in practical, day-to-day applications.
English
Everyone is covering the OpenAI trial as a celebrity feud. The interesting question is the precedent.
If a non-profit can take billions in donations under a stated mission, then convert into a capped-profit entity worth hundreds of billions to insiders, with no clawback to donors, every future research non-profit just got a playbook.
The verdict here defines what a charitable mission statement is actually worth in court. That's the story to track, not the gossip.
Tesla Owners Silicon Valley@teslaownersSV
How the original OpenAI donations were structured. 1. OpenAI Inc. was registered as a 501(c)(3) non-profit in 2015. 2. Stated mission: ensure AGI "benefits all of humanity," with research published openly. 3. Donors, including Musk, contributed under that mission with no equity, no return, no claim. 4. In 2019, OpenAI created a capped-profit subsidiary. The cap is now functionally irrelevant given current valuations. 5. The non-profit board still technically governs, but the capped-profit entity is where the money and the people live. The legal question: did the structural shift breach the terms under which donations were made.
English
Openlie retweetet
How the original OpenAI donations were structured.
1. OpenAI Inc. was registered as a 501(c)(3) non-profit in 2015.
2. Stated mission: ensure AGI "benefits all of humanity," with research published openly.
3. Donors, including Musk, contributed under that mission with no equity, no return, no claim.
4. In 2019, OpenAI created a capped-profit subsidiary. The cap is now functionally irrelevant given current valuations.
5. The non-profit board still technically governs, but the capped-profit entity is where the money and the people live.
The legal question: did the structural shift breach the terms under which donations were made.
English
@SaltySolanaXBT @openlieofficial Yea it's not me my man lol. But good try
English
Openlie retweetet
🚨 Update on the OpenAI lawsuit between Elon Musk and Sam Altman. 🤣 (Great technology ending)
English
Openlie retweetet
BREAKING: Elon Musk concludes testimony in the OpenAI trial.
Key claim from the stand: OpenAI tried to 'steal' a charity, converting a non-profit Musk seed-funded in 2015 into a capped-profit entity now valued in the hundreds of billions.
The verdict here will set precedent for every AI lab structured as a non-profit going forward.
English
Openlie retweetet
Openlie retweetet
Openlie retweetet
"OpenAI have what's called human reinforcement learning, which is another way of saying that they have a whole bunch of people that look at the output of ChatGPT and then say whether that's okay or not okay. Essentially they are training the AI to lie."
— Elon Musk
English
Openlie retweetet
What happened in court today with Elon Musk vs. Sam Altman / OpenAI:
Elon spent a second full day on the stand under cross-examination.
Key moments:
• He called himself “a fool” for giving OpenAI ~$38 million in early funding, believing it would stay a nonprofit for humanity.
• Repeated his core line: “It is not OK to steal a charity.”
• Said the massive Microsoft investment was the tipping point where he lost trust in Altman — turning the org from nonprofit mission to for-profit empire.
• Emphasized that any early for-profit discussions were always meant to serve the nonprofit mission, not replace it.
The betrayal narrative is front and center. Trial continues.
English