Peter Oxley

731 posts

Peter Oxley banner
Peter Oxley

Peter Oxley

@oxpeter

builds snowmen, folds origami, studies ants, teaches bioinformatics, speaks Australian.

New York, NY Beigetreten Temmuz 2011
199 Folgt155 Follower
Massimo
Massimo@Rainmaker1973·
Polyrhythm is the simultaneous use of two or more rhythms. Tapping exercises with the metronome are important to master the most basic of polyrhythms. While apparently easy, it's something that requires huge coordination [source: buff.ly/3Qk7vzD]
English
208
2.7K
19.6K
0
Peter Oxley
Peter Oxley@oxpeter·
@f_dion It has a limited ability to describe individual elements such as columns, though this feature is still very preliminary
English
0
0
0
0
Peter Oxley retweetet
Nathan W Pyle
Nathan W Pyle@nathanwpyle·
Nathan W Pyle tweet media
ZXX
17
621
4.7K
0
Peter Oxley retweetet
Livia Puljak
Livia Puljak@liviapuljak·
Our new study shows that data availability statements are not very useful; 1670 (93%) authors who indicated that data are available on request either did not respond or declined to share their data with us. Journal of Clinical Epidemiology: doi.org/10.1016/j.jcli…
Livia Puljak tweet media
English
201
3.6K
17.9K
0
Peter Oxley retweetet
Laurel Coons 🧬🧬🧬
Laurel Coons 🧬🧬🧬@LaurelCoons·
Graphic design has rules, and they work … 👀
Laurel Coons 🧬🧬🧬 tweet media
English
2K
36.3K
304.6K
0
Piano NYC
Piano NYC@PianoNYC·
After 3 years, an in-person piano recital!
Piano NYC tweet mediaPiano NYC tweet mediaPiano NYC tweet media
English
1
0
2
0
Peter Oxley retweetet
Hannah Davis
Hannah Davis@ahandvanish·
A really key finding is that fatigue and cognitive impairment were not statistically significantly different between hospitalized and non-hospitalized patients! This is a major point as the public assumes that non-hospitalized cases are "mild". #LongCovid 3/
English
4
240
762
0
Peter Oxley retweetet
Lior Pachter
Lior Pachter@lpachter·
I've been thinking about the reactions to @StevenSalzberg1's blog post in which he tries to explain immunology in 6 mins. (e.g. twitter.com/jallepap/statu…), & while much of what there is to say about it has been said, I think it's worth repeating some things. A 3pt.🧵about scicomm:
English
1
7
28
0
Peter Oxley retweetet
Steven Salzberg 💙💛
Steven Salzberg 💙💛@StevenSalzberg1·
When a cancer genomics paper (in a good journal!) says "We used the R program for normalization and data analyses," I get a sinking feeling that I cannot trust these results #bioinformatics_matters
English
30
35
407
0
Peter Oxley
Peter Oxley@oxpeter·
"Pundits have urged people to “listen to the science,” as if “the science” is a tome of facts and not an amorphous, dynamic entity, born from the collective minds of thousands of individual people who argue and disagree about data that can be interpreted in a range of ways."
Retraction Watch@RetractionWatch

“The best science writers learn that…peer-reviewed publications are not gospel and even prestigious journals are polluted by nonsense…” theatlantic.com/science/archiv…

English
0
0
0
0
Peter Oxley retweetet
Dr Karl
Dr Karl@DoctorKarl·
Wow! "For the first time, astronomers have captured solid evidence of a rare double cosmic cannibalism — a star swallowing a compact object such as a black hole/neutron star. In turn, that object gobbled the star’s core, causing it to explode and leave behind only a black hole"
Science News@ScienceNews

For the first time, astronomers have captured solid evidence of a rare double cosmic cannibalism — a star swallowing a compact object such as a black hole or neutron star. sciencenews.org/article/astron…

English
5
10
75
0
Peter Oxley retweetet
Elissa Blake
Elissa Blake@elissablake·
@ben_hr I have abandoned Inbox Zero. I am ‘living with email’
English
38
402
2.1K
0