Angehefteter Tweet

my primary constraint is now code review and architectural understanding.
designing systems by-hand helps me internalize the intricacies of the thing i've built. i can map my intents to specific code. i can (overenthusiastically) tell you why my solution is better than yours. i usually prefer hand-rolling architecture/design patterns and *then* letting LLMs materialize it in code. design is the fun part for me.
recently though i've been impressed by system design work from agents. it's often better, more nuanced, and explores paths i wouldn't have considered within the same timeframe, but i'll never feel one with it like i do my own work.
i always review LLM code/implementation and try to conceptualize patterns, becoming one with the model and all, but my mental model is less durable than something i built myself.
is it worth sacrificing this granular understanding in-favor of being able to verify the correct outcome instead?
i think eventually economic pressures with lean the industry here, but how do software/eng folks think about this today?
English
























