Roberto D'Angelo

10.8K posts

Roberto D'Angelo banner
Roberto D'Angelo

Roberto D'Angelo

@roberdan

Trying to be a good #mirror for Mario, @la_Franci and the world around us. ISE Healthcare Director @microsoft, Chair @FightTheStroke, TED https://t.co/mth0U7gDaJ

Milano, Lombardia, Italia Beigetreten Şubat 2007
4.1K Folgt2.4K Follower
Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ
Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ@ivanfioravanti·
How do you orchestrate your coding agents? I have 4 Claude Code sessions with 4 different providers, Gemini CLI, Cursor, RepoPrompt and things are a bit crazy at the moment 🤣
English
17
0
31
3.8K
Roberto D'Angelo
Roberto D'Angelo@roberdan·
Your AI agent says "done." It isn't. Bugs, no tests, pushed to main. I built a team of 85 AI specialists — architects, CFOs, security auditors — that plan, execute, and independently validate each other's work. Open source. For the solopreneurs github.com/Roberdan/MyCon…
Roberto D'Angelo tweet media
English
1
0
3
97
Sam Altman
Sam Altman@sama·
Here is re-post of an internal post: We have been working with the DoW to make some additions in our agreement to make our principles very clear. 1. We are going to amend our deal to add this language, in addition to everything else: "• Consistent with applicable laws, including the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution, National Security Act of 1947, FISA Act of 1978, the AI system shall not be intentionally used for domestic surveillance of U.S. persons and nationals. • For the avoidance of doubt, the Department understands this limitation to prohibit deliberate tracking, surveillance, or monitoring of U.S. persons or nationals, including through the procurement or use of commercially acquired personal or identifiable information." It’s critical to protect the civil liberties of Americans, and there was so much focus on this, that we wanted to make this point especially clear, including around commercially acquired information. Just like everything we do with iterative deployment, we will continue to learn and refine as we go. I think this is an important change; our team and the DoW team did a great job working on it. 2. The Department also affirmed that our services will not be used by Department of War intelligence agencies (for example, the NSA). Any services to those agencies would require a follow-on modification to our contract. 3. For extreme clarity: we want to work through democratic processes. It should be the government making the key decisions about society. We want to have a voice, and a seat at the table where we can share our expertise, and to fight for principles of liberty. But we are clear on how the system works (because a lot of people have asked, if I received what I believed was an unconstitutional order, of course I would rather go to jail than follow it). But 4. There are many things the technology just isn’t ready for, and many areas we don’t yet understand the tradeoffs required for safety. We will work through these, slowly, with the DoW, with technical safeguards and other methods. 5. One thing I think I did wrong: we shouldn't have rushed to get this out on Friday. The issues are super complex, and demand clear communication. We were genuinely trying to de-escalate things and avoid a much worse outcome, but I think it just looked opportunistic and sloppy. Good learning experience for me as we face higher-stakes decisions in the future. In my conversations over the weekend, I reiterated that Anthropic should not be designated as a SCR, and that we hope the DoW offers them the same terms we’ve agreed to. We will host an All Hands tomorrow morning to answer more questions.
English
3.9K
628
6.1K
3.6M
Roberto D'Angelo
Roberto D'Angelo@roberdan·
@AnthropicAI @DarioAmodei @DarioAmodei e’ ora di tornare alle radici, e’ ora di tornare in Europa e in Italia. / it’s time to consider coming back to the roots of your family: Europe and Italy, places where your values were born and still are alive and will be.
English
0
0
1
13
Zephyr
Zephyr@Zephyr_hg·
I never run out of content to post anymore. Built an automation that monitors 50+ news sources, scores articles for relevance, and writes social posts automatically. It finds trending topics in my niche before they explode everywhere else. Saves me 15-20 hours monthly and keeps me ahead of every trend. Comment "NEWS" and I'll DM it to you (must be following)
Zephyr tweet media
English
3.2K
416
5.8K
691.9K
Roberto D'Angelo
Roberto D'Angelo@roberdan·
@gdb thank you! My son has Cerebral Palsy, dyslexia, dyscalculia, dysgraphia, and I’ve been dreaming for a Mirror Buddy, an AI able to really help him with homework. I just found him talking with ChatGPT voice and discussing a book (it’s very hard to read for him) 🙏🏼🙏🏼🙏🏼
English
0
0
0
26
Roberto D'Angelo
Roberto D'Angelo@roberdan·
@sole24ore ho un problema con l’abbonamento, chi posso contattare per risolverlo? Pls dm me, sul sito non ho trovato. Grazie
Italiano
0
0
0
8
Roberto D'Angelo retweetet
Anish Acharya
Anish Acharya@illscience·
Anish Acharya tweet media
ZXX
138
258
4.8K
432.8K
Roberto D'Angelo retweetet
Aaron Levie
Aaron Levie@levie·
It's sometimes hard to grasp the significance of the reasoning and logic updates that are starting to emerge in powerful models, like GPT-5. Here's a *very simple* example of how powerful these models are getting. I took a recent NVIDIA earnings call transcript document that came in at 23 pages long and had 7,800 words. I took part of the sentence "and gross margin will improve and return to the mid-70s" and modified "mid-70s" to "mid-60s". For a remotely tuned-in financial analyst, this would look out of place, because the margins wouldn't "improve and return" to a lower number than the one described as a higher number elsewhere. But probably 95% of people reading this press release would not have spotted the modification because it easily fits right into the other 7,800 words that are mentioned. With Box AI, testing a variety of AI models, I then asked a series of models "Are there any logical errors in this document? Please provide a one sentence answer." GPT-4.1, GPT4.1 mini, and a handful of other models that were state of the art just ~6 months ago generally came back and returned that there were no logical errors in the document. For these models, the document probably seems coherent and follows what it would expect an earnings transcript to look like, so nothing really stands out for them on what to pay attention to - sort of a reverse hallucination. GPT-5, on the other hand, quickly discovered the issue and responded with: "Yes — the document contains an internal inconsistency about gross-margin guidance, at one point saying margins will “return to the mid-60s” and later saying they will be “in the mid-70s” later this year." Amazingly, this happened with GPT-5, GPT-5 mini, and, remarkably, *even* GPT-5 nano. Bear in mind, the output tokens of GPT-5 nano are priced at 1/20th of GPT-4.1's tokens. So, more intelligent (at this use-case) for 5% the cost. Now, while doing error reviews on business documents isn't often a daily occurrence for every knowledge worker, these types of issues show up in a variety of ways when dealing with large unstructured data sets, like financial documents, contracts, transcripts, reports, and more. It can be finding a fact, figuring out a logical fallacy, running a hypothetical, or requiring sophisticated deductive reasoning. And the ability to apply more logic and reasoning to enterprise data becomes especially critical when deploying AI Agents in the enterprise. So, it's amazing to see the advancements in this space right now, and this is going to open up a ton more use-cases for businesses.
English
53
88
802
205.1K
Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ
Ivan Fioravanti ᯅ@ivanfioravanti·
My next startup will be 100% focused on AI! This is unlimited power in our hands! We just need to make it vertical and position it everywhere! 🔥 Will it still be in Italy? I don't know honestly 🤷🏻‍♂️
English
14
1
75
3.6K
Roberto D'Angelo
Roberto D'Angelo@roberdan·
@gdb Loving that @gdb ! Can it be “customized” for kids with disabilities like dyslexia, dyscalculia, and some cognitive challenges in general? That would be phenomenal … and so much helpful for millions. Happy to help in case. Thanks
English
0
0
0
56
Roberto D'Angelo retweetet
Fight The Stroke Foundation
Fight The Stroke Foundation@FightTheStroke·
Una scelta consapevole del #5x1000 per fare la tua parte a favore dei #bambini con una disabilità di #ParalisiCerebrale e delle loro famiglie🙏 indica il CF 97688330154 nella prossima dichiarazione dei redditi. E grazie.
Fight The Stroke Foundation tweet media
Italiano
0
1
2
171