terver lim retweetet
terver lim
5.8K posts

terver lim retweetet
terver lim retweetet

ADC Raises Alarm Over INEC Landmines
- Plot to Prevent Party From Fielding Candidates
We are compelled to raise serious concerns about a developing situation that appears designed to prevent the African Democratic Congress (ADC) from fielding candidates in the upcoming elections. It is based on documentary evidence which we are now placing before the Nigerian public, including certified INEC records, attendance logs, monitoring reports, and excerpts from the Commission’s own sworn affidavit. Taken together, these documents establish a clear and consistent record of events.
View the records here: bit.ly/NafiuGombeCase
INEC received formal notice of the July 29, 2025 National Executive Committee (NEC) meeting of the ADC. It deployed officials to monitor that meeting. It documented the proceedings and received formal reports from its field officers. Following this, INEC updated its internal records and uploaded the names of the new leadership, including Senator David Mark as National Chairman and Ogbeni Rauf Aregbesola as National Secretary.
These are not claims. They are facts contained in INEC’s own records.
In addition, the Commission’s sworn affidavit before the Federal High Court, in its response to Nafiu Bala Gombe on 12 September 2025, particularly in Clauses 14 to 19, affirms key legal principles: that the leadership transition had already been completed and recognized, that such internal party matters fall outside the scope of judicial interference, that completed acts cannot be reversed by injunction, and also recognizes the David Mark-led NWC.
Yet, despite this clear documentary trail, INEC has now taken the position that it will no longer receive any correspondence from the ADC pending the determination of a matter before the Federal High Court. This is where the contradiction becomes dangerous.
The Electoral Act imposes strict timelines on political parties, including the 21-day notice requirement and submission deadlines. INEC itself has fixed May 10 as the deadline for the submission of relevant documents. However, by refusing to receive communication from the ADC within this same period, the Commission is effectively preventing the Party from complying with the law.
In simple terms, INEC is effectively threatening that unless the courts deliver judgment on the ADC leadership issue by May 10, it will prevent the ADC from producing candidates.
This places the ADC in an impossible position and creates a clear pathway to artificial non-compliance, which can then be used to justify excluding the Party from fielding candidates. That is the landmine.
INEC has claimed that its April 1 decision was taken to avoid rendering the proceedings before the Federal High Court nugatory. The reality is the opposite. By intervening in a matter already before the court and issuing a pronouncement with clear legal and operational consequences, the Commission has itself undermined the very process it claims to protect.
What is even more concerning is that this position contradicts INEC’s own prior conduct and legal stance. The same Commission that monitored, documented, recognized, and swore to an affidavit confirming the ADC leadership is now acting in a way that contradicts its earlier position.
We therefore call on the Commission to immediately reverse this position, resume the acceptance of all lawful correspondence from the ADC, and uphold its constitutional responsibility to ensure a level playing field for all political parties.
We also call on Nigerians to be wary and remain vigilant about these dangerous machinations to subvert Nigeria’s democracy and impose a civilian dictatorship on the country.




English
terver lim retweetet

BREAKING: ADC has released INEC’s affidavit dated 12 September 2025 that affirmed David Mark led NWC
Please pay particular attention to Clauses 14 to 19, which affirm that the leadership transition had already been completed and recognized by INEC, and that such internal party matters fall outside the scope of judicial interference.
It is now crystal clear that Tinubu’s APC and the embattled INEC Chairman, Prof. Amupitan, are using INEC to push a one-party system in Nigeria.
This development raises grave concerns about the independence, neutrality, and credibility of the electoral process in Nigeria. When an institution constitutionally expected to act as an impartial umpire is seen to be taking sides in internal party affairs, it strikes at the very foundation of democratic fairness and public trust.
No democracy can survive where state institutions are turned into political weapons against opposition parties. What is happening before our eyes is not just an attack on ADC, but a dangerous attempt to weaken multiparty democracy and silence alternative political voices in Nigeria. Every patriotic citizen must understand the seriousness of this moment.
We call on all Nigerians to rise to the occasion and save our democracy.




English
terver lim retweetet
terver lim retweetet

The essence is to disorganize our great party but we won't allow them.
ADC Vanguard@ADCVanguard_
BREAKING: ADC releases Video where Nafiu Bala was sighted at David Mark Leadership Unveiling after he tendered his resignation. The @inecnigeria representatives where also present at the Event. The new video exposed Nafiu Bala's attendance at the ADC unveiling ceremony of David Mark-led leadership held in Abuja, July 2025.
English
terver lim retweetet

BREAKING NEWS:
FORENSIC BOMBSHELL: TYPO ERROR EXPOSES BALA? RESIGNATION LETTER FORGERY CLAIM COLLAPSES UNDER SCRUTINY
Darlington Okpebholo Ray reports for Truth Live News Int'l.
A fresh forensic twist has thrown Hon. Nafiu Bala’s denial into serious doubt, as an emerging analysis by Dr Alex Ter Adum, a former Attorney General of Benue State, has uncovered what is described as a “linguistic fingerprint” linking him directly to the disputed resignation letter he insists was forged.
At the centre of this unfolding storm is a seemingly harmless spelling error that may now prove fatal to Bala’s claim.
The word “Chairman” repeatedly appears as “Chiarman”, a peculiar and consistent mistake that Dr Adum argues is far from accidental. According to the report, such recurring patterns are not random slips but deeply ingrained writing habits, the kind that forensic experts rely on to trace authorship with striking accuracy.
In what is rapidly becoming a credibility crisis, the same unusual spelling has been identified in documents previously attributed to Bala and appears again in the controversial resignation letter. For investigators, this is not coincidence, it is evidence.
The implications are serious.
Under Nigeria’s Evidence Act 2011, anyone alleging forgery carries the burden of proof, and courts are empowered to compare disputed documents with verified samples. Legal authorities have consistently upheld the use of writing patterns and stylistic peculiarities as valid tools in determining authorship.
In simple terms, the law does not ignore details like this. It leans on them.
Yet, despite the growing weight of this forensic argument, it is important to state that this remains an expert analysis, not a court verdict. No judicial authority has, at this stage, conclusively ruled on the authenticity of the letter, and no publicly known independent forensic institution has issued a separate confirmation.
But even with that caution, the pressure on Bala is mounting fast.
If the letter is truly a forgery, as he claims, then critical questions demand urgent answers. Where is the police report? Has any formal complaint been filed? Has a counter forensic examination been commissioned to discredit these findings? Or is the public simply being asked to accept denial without evidence?
Efforts to obtain a response from Hon. Bala have so far proved unsuccessful, as he has neither acknowledged nor replied to multiple enquiries sent to his verified email address and official social media platforms.
That silence is now as loud as the evidence itself.
Because in forensic science, the smallest detail can destroy the biggest lie. A single repeated error, unnoticed by many, can become the thread that unravels an entire narrative.
What began as a straightforward claim of forgery is no longer that simple. The story has shifted. The spotlight has moved from the document to the man denying it.
And now, the question is no longer just whether the letter was forged.
The real question is this: how long can a denial stand when the details keep pointing in the opposite direction?


English
terver lim retweetet
terver lim retweetet
terver lim retweetet

@BwalaDaniel Poor outing Sir. Address your shameless outing on @AlJazeera . @mehdirhasan see your friend
English

In 2019 he was public about it; In 2023 he was hypocritically private about it masquerading as a journalist; meanwhile he has zero training or experience as a journalist. In 2027, he is wickedly pretentious about it. Social media vitriol, hate and revenue is more important to him than national interest.
#comeoutofthepoliticalpartisancloset


English
terver lim retweetet
terver lim retweetet
terver lim retweetet

BREAKING: Details have emerged on how Tinubu’s APC allegedly bribed Nafiu Bala with N2 billion in a bid to force a one-party system in Nigeria.
Fresh intelligence from credible sources in Abuja reveals that Nafiu Bala Gombe is reportedly in hiding after allegedly receiving N2 billion from top officials within President Bola Ahmed Tinubu’s administration to destabilize the African Democratic Congress (ADC).
In a swift response, a senior figure within the ADC confirmed this morning that the party will return to the Federal High Court of Nigeria, presided over by Justice Emeka Nwite, immediately after the Easter holidays on Tuesday, April 7, 2027.
According to the party leadership, ADC will formally request the court to dismiss the suit filed by Gombe, arguing that it lacks jurisdiction over internal party matters. The move is backed by respected legal voices such as Inibehe Effiong and Abdul Mahmud, who maintain that the case contradicts established Supreme Court rulings and violates Section 83(5) of the Electoral Act 2026.
This development signals a major legal and political showdown that could shape the future of opposition politics in Nigeria.

English
terver lim retweetet

BREAKING
ADC is taking its fight for democracy global.
As part of our efforts to strengthen international engagement, we are establishing a Special Representatives Network across key global capitals to engage foreign governments, amplify credible information about Nigeria’s political environment, and counter one-sided government narratives.
This comes amid growing attacks on our members, attempts to undermine our leadership, and efforts to restrict political participation ahead of the 2027 General Elections.
Our representatives will engage foreign governments, international media, democracy institutions, and the Nigerian diaspora, providing regular briefings on political developments, human rights concerns, and electoral integrity.
We are also launching a National Documentation Initiative to systematically track and report incidents affecting political participation across Nigeria.
From Washington DC to London, Brussels to Addis Ababa, ADC is building a global platform for accountability.
Nigeria’s democracy must be seen, heard, and defended everywhere.


English
terver lim retweetet
terver lim retweetet

The Crisis in the ADC Is Being Engineered; INEC Has to Be Very Careful - Jega
The impression INEC is giving is that it is part of the scheme to destroy all opposition parties. The opposition wanted the ADA; INEC sat on it for 2 years. Now they have moved to ADC, and they are coming up with something else.
Mahmud Jega, Arise Analyst
English
terver lim retweetet
terver lim retweetet

U.S. Policy Firm To Brief Congress, Trump Administration On INEC’s Suspension Of ADC Leadership | Sahara Reporters bit.ly/4bP08gX

English
terver lim retweetet








