wired_dave

Speech may be free, but lying has a price. To all you conspiratorial nut jobs: FAFO bbc.co.uk/news/articles/…

🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸

I’m not going to quote tweet this nonsense, simply laugh at the map.

So here is the proof.

This clip truly epitomizes the age of Instagram stupidity, where the urge to record stuff is now powerful enough to override instincts programmed into humans since the dawn of time.

@_iheartcanines What a f*cking twat.

Forgot to add the stars bro.

Thanks to all who reached out to our dad Buzz this holiday season. We shared a wonderful Christmas together. We look forward to having him closer to us in a beautiful new home with panoramic views of the city and ocean. Wishing you all a Happy New Year —Jan & Andy Aldrin

NASA released some new close up footage of solar flares and holy moly 😳 it doesn't even look real! "NASA's Solar Dynamics Observatory just released stunning close-range footage of solar flares, revealing the Sun as a maze of blazing plasma loops and chaotic magnetic fields. The new recording shows dark filaments slicing across bright, twisting arcs as massive bursts of energy erupt and reshape in real time. To put the scale in perspective: the Sun is about 1.39 million km wide, roughly 109 times the size of Earth. What looks like small sparks in the footage are actually structures larger than our entire planet. These visuals aren't just beautiful, they're a reminder of how powerful and unpredictable our nearest star truly is." - nasa

@EarthisflatTony Pathetic.

More fukin awesome video proof Earth is flat, Ben kills it! instagram.com/reel/DSxbikhDp…

Remember: most accounts designed to outrage you here aren’t people. They’re bots built to manufacture anger and division. The problem isn’t the bots. It’s the people who profit from lies.

X is coordinated disinformation packaged as Free Speech

X pays people to tell lies

🎄☝️

**Ok sorry for going way off subject but how cool is this shot** On Christmas Eve in 1985, British Airways did something almost unimaginable today. It took four Concordes in formation to celebrate the 10th anniversary of the first commercial Concorde flight, filled them not with paying passengers, celebrities, or transatlantic executives, but with its own staff, and sent them into the winter sky in close formation. This was not a VIP charter or a PR gimmick designed for headlines. It was an internal morale event wrapped inside a historic photoshoot, one of the most extravagant employee perks any airline has ever offered. Surely in the modern era there should be a new Concorde. What a spectacle and what a aeroplane 🚀 Words by Concorde group 👏🏻👏🏻 📷 @British_Airways @Save_Concorde

@EarthisflatTony You’re a simple deluded twat. Emphasis on ‘simple’.

More proof Earth is flat & stationary globers, get over it already! youtube.com/shorts/VDs6OiQ…

🚨Breaking News🚨 There is an ongoing Terrorist situation unfolding at Nakatomi Plaza in Los Angeles. Reports claiming a staff Christmas party was interrupted by armed terrorists, and there is a lone Police detective in the building trying to resolve the situation.

X didn’t liberate speech. It monetized disinformation.

@munday_pau86233 @JohnnyD_cm @alexboge Looks like a globe to me…

@JohnnyD_cm @alexboge Because they tired of this bs. Earth is obviously not a globe with the said radius.

Some time ago, flat Earthers were asked for their models, and the majority who provided specifics described a domed flat Earth with the sun and moon as small, local objects under the dome - both about 32 miles in diameter, circling at around 3000 miles high, with stars projected on the dome roughly 100 miles above them. The animation below models exactly these values. It fully incorporates atmospheric effects (density, scattering, and obscuration), the inverse square law for light falloff, and is 100% faithful to the described flat Earth model. Let’s see how well it matches everyday observations, shall we? To the inevitable deniers flooding the comments: If your personal model differs, post about it on your own content. You didn’t specify one when asked - so it wasn’t incorporated. (Probably because you know it falls apart too.)

@munday_pau86233 @alexboge Yes. Please go away.

@alexboge You obviously not seen the layer cgi footage. Go away.

The next time a 9/11 conspiracy believer says, “There’s no way the hijackers could have flown those jets into the WTC — the turns were too sharp, the descent too steep, the speed too high…” Fact check: That claim is flatly false. We have high-fidelity reconstructions of both Flight 11 and Flight 175 showing the entire flights - from pushback at the gate to impact - built from multiple independent data sources: radar tracks, FAA records, radio communications, and Airfone call logs. Communications, radio and phone, with the ground are included. This isn’t speculation or “theory.” It’s real, recorded data, cross-verified and accurately modeled. Aviation reality check: A Boeing 767 has full control authority at those speeds and altitudes. Steep descents, high speeds, and aggressive turns are well within the aircraft’s aerodynamic and structural limits - especially when flown without concern for passenger comfort, fuel economy, or airframe longevity. What was done was not skillful, just reckless. The aircraft flew exactly as the data shows - and exactly as they were observed to do. Claims that the flights didn’t exist or “couldn’t have been flown that way” are simply denial, based on ignorance of aviation and the evidence. This argument was debunked long ago and can be dismissed outright. I find such arguments or denial to be offensive. Flight 11: youtu.be/uNKTgcKYGnk?si… Flight 175: youtu.be/wih_JR6-p3w?si…