Angehefteter Tweet
yBo
239 posts
@hmmmmmm1458 Sometimes games don't predict the future. They inspire the people who end up building it.
English
게임이 교육이 되어가는 것은 혁신이다.
게임은 과거에 우리의 미래를 보았다.
2013년도 게임이 2026년에 교육 자료로 쓰인다.
세상은 과거 게임이 보았던 시선으로 혁신을 만들어 가고 있다.
터미네이터가 현실이 될까?
사이버펑크 같은 세상이 현실이 될까?
TO THE MOON 처럼 기억을 조작하여 소원을 이루는게 가능해질까?
H@hmmmmmm1458
우크라이나에서는 드론 조종사들이 GTA 5로 훈련을 받는다고 합니다. 다들 아시는 게임 GTA가 맞습니다. 1. 도시 전투 환경에서 타겟 추적·공격 연습 2. 이동 차량 사냥, Shahed 드론 요격 연습 3. 손재주·근육 기억 유지, 여가 시간에 추가 연습 출처 : WeTrueGun (우크라이나 드론 훈련 센터, 국방부 인증)에서 개발한 Seek & Destroy 프로젝트
한국어
22K啦，谢谢各位赛博爹的支持
补上每日一帖：我是傻逼
最近很多朋友在问我，怎么做账号，怎么做冷启动，怎么发有流量
其实很简单，就三点：
当个人
真诚利他
按时出摊
蜗牛King 👑@snail_9106
这条视频，想认真感谢一下这一路关注我的朋友。 从 0 到 21K，我爬了 6 个月。发布1.8万条内容，3700万曝光。 刚开始的时候，我也没有什么方法论。每天发，发完看数据，看完再改。哪类内容有人停留，哪类内容能引发讨论，哪类内容只是自嗨，数据其实都会告诉我。 我开始把内容当成一个系统：选题、表达、互动、复盘、再发布，每一条帖子，都不是孤立的输出 感谢让我遇到 @Stanleysobest 让我脱掉长衫，当一个只搞流量的傻逼，感谢 @rwayne @dashen_wang @lngkximo 给我提供了创作工具，感谢 @ai_xiaomu @jinchenma_ai 的无痛创作，以及所有StanleyTeam社群的所有小伙伴。 最后，感谢所有关注我的朋友们。
中文
@HhhhHannah @predictdotfun 200万U奖池确实有点夸张了。相比正赛期间，我反而觉得赛前阶段更值得研究，信息相对充分，市场情绪也没那么疯狂。
中文
大的真的要来了👀
@predictdotfun 创始人 dingaling 刚刚预告，世界杯活动总奖池高达 200万 U。
这两天打开 Predict 官网的朋友们应该已经看到了，世界杯专属页面正式上线，页面主题是👇
Wave your flag. Predict the Cup.
目前不仅有冠军预测，还包括小组赛、金靴、进球、单场胜负、让分、球员数据等多种预测玩法。虽然距离世界杯正赛开打还有几天，但有不少市场已经开始分配积分。
对于想拿 Predict Points 的朋友来说，这段时间反而是一个相对低风险的窗口，赛前信息稳定，波动没那么剧烈，可以优先关注有积分、盘口清晰、流动性还没完全卷起来的市场。
👀币安主站和币安钱包后续大概率也会围绕世界杯接入更多玩法。
世界杯 + Predict + 币安入口，你准备好了吗？
#Predictfun
dingaling@dingalingts
大的 要来了🔮
中文
纽约这次尼克斯主场 G3 的门票，已经不是“贵”能形容了。
公开票务数据显示，G3 最低二级市场票价已经接近 1 万美元，中位票价约 1.74 万美元，最高票价超过 10 万美元。MSG 篮球容量接近 2 万人，按中位价大概换算一下，一场比赛对应的票面需求规模就是 3 亿美元。
我查询了一下尼克斯上一次拿 NBA 总冠军，还是 1973 年。如今他们总比分 2:0 领先，G3 回到麦迪逊广场花园，纽约的球迷们情绪已经达到沸腾。
夸张的是，特朗普也会到场观赛，安保升级，场外观赛活动都受到影响。这场 G3，已经不单是篮球比赛，也是全美焦点事件。
那么问题来了：马刺这次能不能在客场扳回一城？还是尼克斯先拿到赛点？有没有 NBA 大师？
再来提醒一下，币安主站和币安钱包正在进行 @predictdotfun NBA 活动，参与单场比赛和总冠军预测，都有额外 Predict Points 奖励。
#Predictfun
中文
This is one of the more nuanced takes on crypto regulation I've read recently. Too often the conversation gets reduced to "more regulation is bad" or "more regulation is good," when the reality is that both clarity and accessibility matter.
What makes South Africa interesting is that it appears to have made a deliberate choice in favor of certainty. For institutions, that's attractive. Investors, banks, and larger firms generally prefer a framework where the rules are strict but predictable. The alternative—regulatory ambiguity—can be even more expensive.
At the same time, your point about participation is important. A regulatory system can be technically clear while still being practically exclusionary. If compliance costs, licensing requirements, and banking relationships become barriers that only well-funded players can overcome, innovation risks becoming concentrated among a small group of incumbents.
The tension between the FSCA framework and SARB's exchange control regime is particularly fascinating. On one hand, crypto activity is being brought into a formal regulatory structure. On the other, founders and users still face uncertainty when capital crosses borders. That kind of regulatory split can create friction even when the individual rules themselves are clear.
What stood out most to me was the idea that legal certainty is being purchased at the cost of participation. That's a trade-off many jurisdictions are struggling with right now, not just South Africa. The challenge for regulators everywhere is finding a balance where compliance is rigorous enough to build trust, but not so burdensome that only the largest players are left standing.
English
South Africa’s crypto regulatory architecture is the most brutally beautiful contradiction on the African continent. The FSCA’s licensing framework is deliberately exacting: capital adequacy hurdles, fit-and-proper tests, and custodial audit requirements that have shelved smaller local exchanges before they clear onboarding. It is brutal in its elitism. Yet compared to the regulatory vaporware of jurisdictions that still govern digital assets through 1940s securities statutes, the statutory certainty is almost beautiful. You know exactly which rule will kill you.
Cross-jurisdictionally, the contrast sharpens. While the EU struggles with MiCA’s territorial overlay and the US rotates between enforcement waves and appellate confusion, South Africa wrote a bespoke crypto asset regime into its Financial Sector Regulation Act architecture within three years. That legislative velocity is rare. The catch is that SARB’s exchange control framework still treats crypto as an unapproved foreign asset for residents, creating a compliance fracture: FSCA says trade legally; SARB says explain your offshore wallet. Founders navigate a split personality.
The brutality intensifies when capital controls meet the FATF grey-list. Banks de-risk aggressively; compliance costs metastasize; and the same regulatory clarity that attracts institutional interest becomes a pricing mechanism that filters out retail innovators. It is a landscape where legal certainty is purchased at the cost of participation.
That duality is why the trend resonates. South Africa’s financial system does not apologize for its scars. It regulates with the same austere grandeur as its terrain — uncompromising, theatrical, and impossible to ignore.
#FSCA
#蓝V互关
English
@KhaledSMQ_ The more I use coding agents, the more I realize context retrieval matters as much as model quality. Feeding the right 50 lines often beats feeding 5,000 lines.
English
AI coding agents burn most of their context window grepping blind and reading whole files.
So I built greplm - fast, offline code search + code intelligence made for the agent loop.
~99% fewer tokens on search. Same files, just the lines that matter.
🔗 github.com/KhaledSMQ/grep…
English
