6digit studio IDE

We made an update to CORDIAL: - Background parallax shader - Optimistic UI updates - Snap camera when switching between sessions - Camera tilt (configurable) youtu.be/VB6K0A3fsnw

@ethanolivertroy @cursor_ai It truly is. Super fast!

@6digitstudio @cursor_ai Composer 2.5 is pretty bad ass 😎

excited to be joining @cursor_ai and for all that we'll be building together

You seem to not understand throughput at all. This is worrying. Apply your network-skills to the problem. Also, understand that you can literally make decisions 8 hours a day and have the AI code this out at 100x of your native capacity. This is literally a category error. Or are you trolling? Also, I'd be happy to show you my projects, but that would break the anti-AI narrative.

I am so thoroughly convinced that anyone who thinks AI 100x's their output is a liar or a lunatic. You are telling me you can make 1 years worth of decisions in 3.65 days? Let alone describing those accurately and coaxing the result from the AI... (1.8 days european time)?

@KonstantinKisin Honestly, I actually feel bad for these people. They are in a really sticky situation. Admitting wrong-doing arguably make a lot of them likely to be tried for treason.

@KonstantinKisin I don't think they actually believe that. I think it's a combination of: - Commitment + Consistency, they refuse to admit mistakes - Order-following, Milgram/Stanford Prison Experiment style - Mass media brainwashing - Cowardice - Rationalization skills - Pure evil intent

Our country is run by people who believe that the best way to solve a problem is to pretend it doesn't exist.

@Egenda2 @Danny_hoffzone Er vel relativt vanskelig å kakle på norsk og forvente å greie å tromme opp nok engasjement til å kjøpe en gulost på REMA i måneden engang.

@Danny_hoffzone Aner ikke. Det er derfor jeg spør.

Hva er det ENE du angrer mest på at du sa "nei" til i livet ditt? #AngrerDu #NorskLiv

I actually also struggle with Zed as a daily driver, not that I write too much code. But my problem is that Zed extremely often leaves me in a situation where the screen is just full of windows I don't know how to dismiss. Obviously a SKILL ISSUE, but I don't really feel the pressing urge to acquire these skills when I don't have similar experiences in any other editors I use. That being said, I love Zed and I think it has a real chance of winning huge market-shares. I just need to figure out how to get out of "agent mode" so I can see my file-tree.

尝试过 3 次将编辑器从 VSCode 切换到 Zed, 但是都失败了 Zed 的 Git Diff 页面怎么用都不习惯，一滚动就到下一个文件去了，不知道当前看的是那个文件。 经常使用 VSCode SSH Remote 开发， `code dirname` 打开的新窗口是基于 SSH 远程目录打开的，几乎无感， npm run dev 启动的临时端口，会自动转发，本地可以直接打开。 这两个点可能会将我绑在 VSCode

@Akasheth_ Composer 2.5 is "better" than Opus 4.8 in many ways. I am switching from Claude Max to Composer 2.5 ($60) next month to see if the switch is possible. Composer 2.5 is faster, by a mile. But I had to yell at it yesterday because it kept prompting ME to run CLI-commands.

I'm seeing a lot of people saying composer 2.5 is better than opus 4.8. I haven't used composer 2.5 yet, so I'm curious. If you've used, share your honest experience?

Jeg kan ikke fiske, likevel utvikler jeg en kode-app(!) Jeg har jobbet som utvikler i 3 tiår, koder med AI 12 timer hver dag (morgen til kveld). Jobber mer, ikke mindre, men det er jo helt sykt produktivt. Koser meg veldig. Det er åpenbart ikke uten frustrasjoner, men det er jo temmelig nøyaktig de tingene du påpeker. Keep creating!

Jeg kan ikke kode, likevel utvikler jeg en fiske-app. Det som har gjort det mulig var vibe coding med AI. Jeg beskriver hva jeg vil ha, og AI genererte koden. Plutselig kunne jeg bygge funksjoner og prototyper som jeg tidligere bare kunne drømme om✅️ Det åpnet en helt ny verden for meg. Jeg sparte enormt med tid, men jeg har også lært at AI ikke erstatter egen testing og finpussing Det kom da til et punkt hvor jeg måtte få hjelp av profesjonelle utviklere for å få appen opp på et nivå som etterhvert kan lanseres. Det finnes så mange vibe kodede apper der ute og mange er gode, men jeg så behovet for å få inn mer spesialisert kompetanse. Det de får til nå er ikke bare fint å se på, men funksjonaliteten er på et helt annet nivå🙌 Har dere som ikke kan kode prøvd Vibe coding eller AI for å bygge noe? Og dere som kan kode, hva tenker dere om Vibe coding?👇

@tlakomy That's 0 lines too many.

Zero lines of code written by hand within the last 12 months ✅

@DanVitorPH @mlech26l Industry plant.

@mlech26l Wife's contribution

why pay $20/month for Claude if you can run gigaslop_27b_q8 on a $20k GPU rig in your living room

@jackunheard You also gained one. :)

Lost 300 followers over this post. Good riddance.

@PythonPr Still ahead of Rust, I see.

Python 🥇🥇🥇

@mdt22_ @Griffin69211438 @SamRo "but that’s answering a different question." I literally said that the whole time. The premise is broken.

@6digitstudio @Griffin69211438 @SamRo your take on financial literacy and how people shouldn’t play the lottery: sure, valid. but that’s answering a different question. maybe your “always being broke” is telling

I love a financial literacy test that sees if you can pick the better lottery to play.

No, I never said they have no expected value, that would be insane. I said you should expect to win 0. If this nuance is lost on anyone, that is more alarming than the results on the original survey. If the expected value was 0 nobody would buy the lottery. This is an uphill battle, but to try to back of my point: "E: Don't gamble" Which one would you pick now? If you pick anything but E, you are financially illiterate. Being good at math/statistics is not the same as financial literacy.

@6digitstudio @Griffin69211438 @SamRo it is not a trick question man😭 “expected winning” has a clear and real definition, and value in this context. expected outcome question DO have implications on financial situations. you didn’t “reject the premise”. you said they both have no expected value (being incorrect)

I didn't "misunderstand the question", I obviously refuted the premise. The fact that this seems to be hard to pick up is saying quite a bit about English literacy in this thread. I do math at University level, I've been coding for 40+ years. I am always broke. This makes me financially illiterate, but above average good at math (see, I understand averages). I can solve the question EASILY, but that is a concept that is COMPLETELY ORTHOGONAL to my financial literacy; my ability to handle money. But I am not so financially illiterate that I calculate percentage chances of winning the lottery, because that would literally be insane. The test is obviously bad. You not rejecting the test on bad design in a test for financial literacy, which is literally defined as "money skills" is frankly quite alarming. It is at best a trick question, and the (only) correct answer is "Don't play the lottery if you don't have money to burn".

@6digitstudio @Griffin69211438 @SamRo reality defines “expected outcome/winnings” as a statistical concept. note: the question wasn’t “should people w/o extra cash buy lotto” crazy how eager you are to die on the hill of “obviously misunderstood the question”

@Griffin69211438 @mdt22_ @SamRo This is the difference. You define "financial literacy" as "good at math". I define "financial literacy" as "good with money". We are probably 100% in agreement on everything if we just decide which definitions to go by.

@6digitstudio @mdt22_ @SamRo Which has the higher expected savings? Note a few things 1. the conceptual understanding being tested here is the same as in the original question 2. answering the question does not automatically tell you which thing to pick! 3. this is relevant to financial literacy

Not playing the lottery is the only correct answer. Let me ask you this, Griffin. If you have a friend who is bad with money, do you sit him down an afternoon and calculate which lotteries have the best chance of a payout? If so, you are financially illiterate. If you tell him, "Hey, Greg, let's spend that money on beer instead of the lottery", you are financially literate and you also seem like a cool dude to hang out with.

You seem to be interpreting my answers as an answer to the question posed. That was never my intention, the answer is obviously dismissive of the premise of the question, not an admission of ineptitude in statistics. I said it was bad test-design. It IS bad test design. Your question is a lot better and it also is an example of actual financial literacy. But again, I'd be hard pressed to find people having to buy cars on a day-to-day basis. But your test actually measures financial literacy.

@6digitstudio @mdt22_ @SamRo Imagine the following question: deciding between two cars that cost the same. The gas one is more efficient than your current car and will save you 2.5k/year. The electric will likely (70%) save you 2k, but there’s a 30% chance electricity gets cheaper and it saves you 4k

@iBuild Microsoft on the eternal losing streak. I cannot remember the last time I saw so consistent long term mismanagement, to be honest.

microsoft has banned employees from using claude code. we're so back, baby!