Margaret Rosenfeld

7.1K posts

Margaret Rosenfeld banner
Margaret Rosenfeld

Margaret Rosenfeld

@AgentM_Tech

She’s All About That Tech: legal and regulatory musings for AI, Web3, BigData, Cybersecurity and Privacy. (posts are not legal or financial advice).

Se unió Temmuz 2011
3.8K Siguiendo3.6K Seguidores
Tweet fijado
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld@AgentM_Tech·
Pretty sure Taylor Swift concert tickets are a security under the Howey Test as applied by Gensler’s SEC. All sold out in presale and you can sell a $200 for $4000 on the stubhub exchange. Sold to support building the platform for the concert.
English
183
817
5.1K
0
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld@AgentM_Tech·
4) The cryptonative path, where disintermediation is the actual feature, is still ahead of us. Glad to see these conversations moving forward with our US regulators.
English
0
0
0
35
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld@AgentM_Tech·
3) This keeps the debate going of whether we should be retrofiting legacy rails, or build something cryptonative. This SEC approval is firmly in the retrofit column. I am not criticizing that because it is still a milestone.
GIF
English
1
0
0
45
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld@AgentM_Tech·
1/ This summary of the #SEC's approval of trading tokenized securities on #NASDAQ by Larry Florio gets it right, and it is worth reading before the breathless headlines take over. 🧵
Larry Florio@larryflorio

The SEC just approved tokenized securities trading on @NasdaqExchange, first nat'l exchange to get the green light The headlines will start flying about how groundbreaking this is, but I think there's some nuances worth thinking about too 🧵

English
2
0
1
181
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld@AgentM_Tech·
@propelforward Agree. Any rights associated with a token arise from off chain contracts such as licenses or terms of use not from the token alone. Without that distinction the language risks creating confusion around enforceability and what holders actually receive.
English
0
0
0
17
Drew Hinkes
Drew Hinkes@propelforward·
I'm very much enjoying the SEC guidance but there do appear to be some private law/commercial law issues here... how does a crypto asset "convey [presumably legal] rights" ?
Drew Hinkes tweet media
English
2
2
14
1.5K
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld@AgentM_Tech·
9) I am working through the full 70+ page release now. More to come on the specific definitional frameworks and where I think the comment letters should focus. Everyone should be thinking about where they want to weigh in and get involved.
GIF
English
0
0
1
31
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld@AgentM_Tech·
8) The public comment period on this SEC interpretative release is the moment when practitioners, issuers, exchanges, and investors should be engaging to shape how these lines actually get drawn.
English
1
0
0
36
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld@AgentM_Tech·
1/ The #SEC just released its commission-level interpretive guidance on the application of federal securities laws to hashtag#crypto assets for public comment. This is the "token taxonomy" that SEC Chair Atkins has been signaling since last November. tinyurl.com/5fwpmen8 🧵
English
1
0
1
114
Amy Street 🇺🇸
Amy Street 🇺🇸@Amystreet·
Proud to share that I’ve accepted the role of CMO at @SuperteamUSA. I’ll be supporting teams building on Solana across the United States, hosting events and experiences that bring builders together and helping onboard more American talent into the ecosystem. We’re kicking things off in the place I call home: Miami🌴 Grateful and excited to work alongside the outstanding leadership of @NickyScanz. Looking forward to the adventures ahead! 🇺🇸
Superteam USA@SuperteamUSA

Superteam USA is here. Our mission: accelerating founders across America. An elite community for builders across AI, biohacking, consumer products, onchain payments, and more.

English
275
28
739
51.9K
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld@AgentM_Tech·
@Amystreet @EasyEatsBodega Sounds like people are just misusing the new reporting feature. If the post itself isn’t paid, tagging it as a “paid partnership” would actually be inaccurate. Sounds like @elonmusk should look into this.
English
0
0
1
31
Easy
Easy@EasyEatsBodega·
So lemme get this straight. Someone has reported EVERY. SINGLE. MENTION I have on my timeline of prediction markets as paid content. When my deal is not a set number of posts more being a brand ambassador. So now, I just want to make sure I understand it, if they are not directly paying me for posts. I must mark them as paid? When that’s not accurate? But my bio has partner in it. Because that’s what I am? @nikitabier I’ve always disclosed. Even before the flag came out for content. Have ALWAYS been upfront when I am paid for content. But I just wanna hear it from you that, if im a partner / brand ambassador, but not paid for X post, I have to still mark it as being paid? That feels incorrect…
English
69
1
124
22K
Margaret Rosenfeld
Margaret Rosenfeld@AgentM_Tech·
@Amystreet @EasyEatsBodega You do not have to say “paid partnership” if that’s not accurate. The FTC just requires the relationship be clear in the post itself. In this case they’re sponsoring the event, so something like “working with ___ on this event” or “partnering with ___ on this event”.
English
1
0
1
30