sabroshi
369 posts

Tweet fijado

@JacobYako2 Why don’t you build it? BSV is full of people who think they know the answer but won’t or “cant” build it themselves.
Also, every other coins association/central authority incentivizes devs to build things they think are useful. BSVA does not.
English

I’m reading all this crap about adoption for BSV and complaining. Why the heck won’t someone build an exchange that has Bsv as the plumbing. Binance, coinbase and custodial wallets like atomic by crypto dot com, and exodus build exchanges and swaps but BSV being the greatest blockchain hasn’t built an exchange and be the plumbing. It’s a speculative world let Bsv accommodate the market now. It’s so easy to get a bigger piece of the market but everyone is building everything except the only thing the market wants. So easy. Start small and expand on it. And the money made will be glorious to expand.
English

@___siggi___ @Kate_L_Mosso @BSVAssociation It’s overwhelmingly the worst association in all of crypto.
BSVA literally repels talented builders.
English

The people at @BSVAssociation are doing their best with limited resources. That deserves recognition, not boycotts.
If billions are ready to flow in, they don't need permission — capital finds builders. If it requires a board reshuffling first, it was never as committed as it claimed.
Boycotts and ultimatums assume the world owes you a particular outcome. The ecosystem advances through people quietly doing the work — shipping code, onboarding users, solving real problems. Not hashtags.
Want change? Build something. Outwork everyone. That's how you earn a seat at any table.
English

random sports bot betting acct popped up on my feed and I tailed. Both hit so far kekek
@coinyeezy dis u?
Moisty Bets@MoistyBets
EARLY ENTRIES HIT Houston vs Oklahoma State ✅ Georgia TECH vs Clemson ✅
English

BANGGGG
CLEMSON ✅
HOUSTON ✅
2/2 on the day! FOLLOW AND HIT THAT NOTIFICATIONS BELL
Moisty Bets@MoistyBets
MARCH MADNESS LIVE BET DROP TRACKER MARCH 7 2026
English

@MoistyBets im in at target on both games. dont lost me my monies
English

@theRealKiyosaki Unfortunately you are buying Epstein Bitcoin….
The true Bitcoin is one of the forks from 2017. BCH or BSV
English

I Am Warning You: In Rich Dad’s Prophecy published 2013 I warned of the biggest stock market crash in history still coming.
That giant crash is now imminent.
The good news is those of you who followed my rich dad’s warning and prepared….the coming crash will make you richer beyond your wildest dreams.
For those who are not prepared the coming crash will be your worst nightmare.
I am excited and can’t wait for the coming giant crash. I have my real gold, silver, Ethereum and Bitcoin.
No fake gold, silver, or Bitcoin.
I am so bullish on Bitcoin I am buying more and more as Bitcoin’s price goes down.
Why? There will only ever be 21 million Bitcoin and there are nearly 21 million Bitcoin already in circulation.
Get the message?
I will be buying more Bitcoin as people panic and sell into the coming crash.
This coming crash may make you richer beyond your wildest dreams if you realize crashes are the best of times to get richer.
Market crashes are priceless assets going on sale.
Let this crash make you richer.
Take care.
English

@barneyxbt imagine buying the real Bitcoin for $17 in 2026 lol
Might want to grab a few just in case…
English

epstein funded the creation of tether and the implementation of taproot.
both conveniently stopped bitcoin from doing the one thing it was built to do - replace the dollar
tether props up crypto with printed tokens backed by nothing. USDT & USDC defeated the purpose of sending bitcoin to one another as payment.
taproot killed on-chain scaling so btc could never threaten visa or the fed.
they didn’t kill bitcoin they neutered it and let you keep the t-shirt
the whitepaper says peer to peer electronic cash.
not digital gold. not store of value. not something you hold on coinbase and hope.
if btc was deliberately crippled from scaling then which fork actually kept the original vision alive.
BSV or BCH ?
one of them is the real bitcoin and the fact you’ve been trained to laugh at both should tell you everything you need to know.
English


@BitcoinGh0st @kreeflewer segwit is a distraction hardly a reason bitcoin is dead
English
sabroshi retuiteado

REMEMBER WHEN THE CO FOUNDER OF BLOCKSTREAM, (Gregory Maxwell aka Nullc) THE GUY WHO LOOKS LIKE A PEDO, OUTRIGHT LIED ABOUT EPSTEIN FUNDING BLOCKSTREAM?
same dude was responsible for all the blocklists, banning and gaslighting of the conversation surrounding big blocks.
theyre all feds from mossad or mossad adjacent atleast.
time to end blockstream.

English
sabroshi retuiteado

@Decentralizd @kreeflewer Segwit forces transactions and data offchain to scale.
That’s not bitcoin.
English

@kreeflewer @Decentralizd It can’t even be hijacked back w a hard fork because Segwit ruined it 😂
English

@Decentralizd @BitcoinGh0st Tip: it can only be hijacked back with a hard fork
English

@Decentralizd @kurtwuckertjr @FDN999999 I agree screaming about it would never work and I had also given up on that but the recent Epstein/Mossad connections seem like a realistic catalyst to get ppl to understand.
It’s a much more consumable topic now than it has been for the past 8 years.
English

because the legend is more truth than the truth in reality
we can scream until we are blue in the face, people wont listen, i did it for years
you have to beat them on their terms in their homefield and do it such a way that there is no doubt as to your intentions
telling people to buy anything thats 'an altcoin fork' instantly undermines any chance of convincing them
telling them we can save bitcoin and explaining it doesnt, they are more receptive to that, if they choose to use forks after that, cool, thats a bonus
but youll never convince the world the legend of bitcoin isnt real and so on from the outside while also telling them to come to the 'real bitcoin' (theyre all real bitcoin tbh) but thats another 50-400 yrs out in terms of public understanding prolly
i like to refer to it as Bitcoin vs bitcoin
ones the main brand
English

@Decentralizd @kurtwuckertjr @FDN999999 Yea but the only reason everyone assumes that is because of a giant mossad propaganda campaign.
That doesn’t seem like too much of an uphill battle to win. It’s obvious everyone was duped.
English

@BitcoinGh0st @kurtwuckertjr @FDN999999 the fact its the main chain that everyone assumes is the main chain and has for the longest period of time and yea the exchanges own the ticker rulebooks and shit so we have an uphill battle with a bit of rot to content with for sure
still not worth walking away
English

@Decentralizd @kurtwuckertjr @FDN999999 Why is it not up for debate that BTC is actually the fork and BCH is actually bitcoin?
That’s what I don’t understand.
English

@kurtwuckertjr @FDN999999 @BitcoinGh0st i want a bitcoin that gets adopted by the planet, technicals come 2nd
forks are good to prove the science but not the replacements, atleast not in our lifetime
we need to educate the world on fixing bitcoin, not sacrificing it for our failures
English

@Decentralizd @kurtwuckertjr @FDN999999 I still don’t understand the mother chain argument. The ticker symbol makes it the mother chain?
Putting a Ferrari badge on Buick does not make it a Ferrari.
By all technical regards BTC has always been the fork. Epstein/Mossad just got the world to call the fork BTC
English

yea but the thing you guys keep refusing to accept is the bitcoin chain owns the bitcoin brand and anything other than the main chain will always be considered inferior, the tech is a thing that doesnt really matter yet to most people
its all about the things accepted as truths aka narratives and social aspects still
mike hearn was kind of right in his blog post when he quit, but hes still a quitter
same thing could be said about forking off in a sense, sure its a good part of the conversation and proof why bitcoin can scale, but im not sold on any forks surpassing bitcoin within our lifetime because bitcoin itself needs to be rescued and nurtured or none of this will ever work, we have to fight for the mother chain or whats the point?
not to mention all the extremely distasteful actions of certain people in that community, while being technically smart, the leadership is a complete failure and a toxic distraction from the real conversation of scaling the main chain, not handing it over to mossad willingly like we have done
theres still time to correct course and reunite, but you guys are far too entrenched and stubborn and have just as much of a chance as digibyte or my bch fork from 2019 to surpass bitcoin
the adoption rate is the security model, giving up on that just hands control to the state, as you can see happening in real time because everyone is off larping about fedslop chains like solana and being righteous on their dead bitcoin fork, trust me i did it for years i get it
but its time to fight the real fight again
English

Yea ok on a theoretical level we all agree on that, but then what? Increase the block size? Surely not the block time bc that would be hazardous and not really game changing.
Let’s say we want to achieve 10.000 TPS (minimum for real world use like grocery stores and live payments), my knowledge tells me we should increase the block size by 1400/1500 times resulting in a single block of 1-2 GB -> annual growth of the blockchain 120 TERABYTES. That s insane. it would put literally every miner out of business. Even if we increase up to ‘only’ 1000 TPS still the numbers are crazy.
So I’m either not smart enough to see a change in the software that can allow more TXs w less space OR this is what we have and f it. Let’s focus on building solid LN channels or L2s rather than jerking off hypothetical hard forks that would require massive amounts of memory and prohibitly expensive hardware.
I hope some smart coder will develop a way to increase tps, but tbh that’s not the n1 reason for Bitcoin adoption slow down. The slow down comes from Bitcoin ignorance, quantum ignorance, low liquidity, any liquidity grab (alts, stocks), ai computing demand etc.
And all of them would soon gradually vanish if we focus on educating zero coiners in the (real) world rather than fighting on x.
English

@FDN999999 @Decentralizd The 51% attack is irrelevant. Once BTC miners switched to the correct fork it wouldn’t be an issue.
Satoshi had a vision
English

No those can be 51% attacked in a few hours, Bitcoin is still the best version because miners and Bitcoin era already realised all this and did NOT update to Bitcoin core v30 AND developed Bitcoin Knots and BIP110. All this fud is coming from the same people who were with Epstein trying to destroy the only really resilient chain on the planet (Bitcoin, and maybe Monero too). Bitcoin is open software and that’s why we know already since years that malicious developers were funded and put in charge of the GitHub, but guess what? It doesn’t really matter because we are smarter and we are running Knots (or older versions of Bitcoin Core). Don’t get psy op’d to del your bitcoins at the bottom of the cycle, this is the time to buy
English


