Tankie ☭

48.1K posts

Tankie ☭ banner
Tankie ☭

Tankie ☭

@HandsOffDPRK

Tankie | Progressive Muslim Convert | Heretic | I just block idots and trolls, mostly trolls. Islamic-Marxist-Leninist-Jucheist-MZT+ Follower

The Killing Fields Se unió Temmuz 2023
785 Siguiendo1.8K Seguidores
Tweet fijado
Tankie ☭
Tankie ☭@HandsOffDPRK·
Dont Forget The Brutal US Invasions , Carpet bombings , Scorched Earth Campaigns , Genocides usually followed by Brutal Civil Wars , assassination attempts & nonstop coup plots funding of terrorists and rebels the list goes on and on , and im not making any of this up.
Tankie ☭ tweet media
English
43
39
232
67.5K
Tankie ☭
Tankie ☭@HandsOffDPRK·
@GatitaDisidente Stalin and Mao liberated their workers. You just believe in anti-communist propaganda about them.
English
0
0
0
8
Jax GreenRiver
Jax GreenRiver@ManaSlingSlashr·
@AmmarTawwaf @iheilhoppe Bro, no one wants you to go extinct. We jyst want you to leave us alone. Which is apparently too much to ask for
English
2
0
15
223
Tankie ☭
Tankie ☭@HandsOffDPRK·
The whole point of anarchism and communism is to to abolish the state and make an moneyless classless, stateless society where the means of productions is owned by the masses. The difference between the two is how and when we do it. Isn't it literally part of anarchism to be abolishing these class structures immediately which is where communism differs? do you legit not understand the own idealogy you are supporting?
English
1
0
0
13
Aoife: an Síochánta
@Shao_Khan001 Except he really wasn’t and his project failed to his own anti-intellectual biases . I can see you’re just trying to be edgy though
English
1
0
1
95
GoreTiger
GoreTiger@GoreTiger64th·
The man you're paying is capitalist. The company you're paying is Capitalist. You're using capitalist services to press your larping. Your money which you pay to capitalism is going to a capitalist who uses it for anti-communist/socialist ventures. You are paying your opposition just so you can larp on here. It's actually pretty funny.
English
1
0
0
4
Tankie ☭
Tankie ☭@HandsOffDPRK·
Class collaboration of the oppressed is not the same as class collaboration of the oppressor. This is because "Two enemies must unite in order to fight an even bigger enemy." Achieving national liberation is important for building socialism as you cant build socialism without national liberation. The alliance with the revolutionary (no need to put revolutionary in quotations) national bourgeoisie is temporary and during the phase of socialist construction they will be removed which only happens AFTER national liberation is reached. Mao is correct.
English
1
0
1
19
FreedomFlamingo
FreedomFlamingo@FreedomFlaming0·
Mao says that national struggle should ally with the "revolutionary" national bourgeoisie. Nationalism is class collaboration
FreedomFlamingo tweet media
English
2
1
7
153
Tankie ☭
Tankie ☭@HandsOffDPRK·
@HaterOfFeds @AliceBright_ we were justified to do so as you were toying around in the telephone exchange during a war against fascists.
English
1
0
0
7
Tankie ☭
Tankie ☭@HandsOffDPRK·
Here's Plenty of books dunking on his work...because Wilderson never “proved” Afropessimism. He asserts that anti-Blackness is ontological and permanent. Which is exactly what Marxists reject. Wacquant says Afropessimism freezes Blackness into one fixed condition, exports a U.S. racial framework onto the whole world, and basically gives up politically by making anti-Blackness permanent: newleftreview.org/issues/ii144/a… Historical Materialism has a Marxist critique directly answering Wilderson’s claim that Marxism can’t treat white supremacy as a basic antagonism: historicalmaterialism.org/article/afro-p… Black Agenda Report points out that Wilderson misrepresents Marxism as if it just reduces racism to economics: blackagendareport.com/teaching-polit… Salvage also critiques Afropessimism for flattening Black political history and erasing anti-colonial revolutionary traditions: salvage.zone/the-flatness-o… And Kevin Ochieng Okoth’s Red Africa pushes back on the idea that Marxism can’t analyze slavery, colonialism, and Black liberation. Slavery wasn’t outside capitalism; it was part of capitalism’s development: roape.net/2023/12/19/tim…
English
0
0
0
9
Tankie ☭
Tankie ☭@HandsOffDPRK·
Anarchists cant seem to understand anything, hence why they are suffering from cognitive dissonance with flaws in their own ideology such as with presuming state functions and authoritarianism when in the face of counter revolution or the fact that they are currently defending mysticism and metaphysics as an valid view of explaining the world.
English
1
0
0
9
Tankie ☭
Tankie ☭@HandsOffDPRK·
"Realm of the mind" doesnt make it metaphysical. Ideas are real, but they are produced socially and historically. Racism, hierarchy, religion, law, ideology, etcetera exist in people’s heads and in institutions. Marxism already accounts for that. Its called ideology. So you are just taking real material oppression, calling it "ontological" and acting like that explains more. It doesnt. It makes it unfalsifiable. If it exists in history, it has causes. If it has causes, it can be fought materially.
English
1
0
0
19
Federal Inquisition🏴‍☠️
@HandsOffDPRK @AliceBright_ And yet ontological antagonisms are prevalent in the world around us. When you limit your own allowances on the interconnectivity between the material plane and the realm of the mind you ignore half of the material conditions
English
2
0
0
14
Tankie ☭
Tankie ☭@HandsOffDPRK·
"Monopoly on violence" means monopoly over legitimate coercion inside a territory. If your revolution has armed militias enforcing decisions, defending space, disciplining enemies, and stopping counterrevolution, then it is exercising coercive power. Saying "anarchists never possess a monopoly" just means either you can’t actually enforce anything, or rival armed groups can do whatever they want. So pick one: powerless mutual aid network, or organized coercive authority. If it is the second, you are doing state functions and playing word games.
English
1
0
0
7