Kelly Zbinden-Brassard

@DeniseFelty3 @Niss_Cee @icharleswilson There hasn’t been an evidentiary hearing yet.

@Niss_Cee @icharleswilson Oh dear does this mean that the 20,000 of files and videos of evidence against Robinson is invalid?🤣

Anyone know who the guy in the 'Par-Tee' shirt is? He was doing something with the camera... I believe this was BEFORE Charlie arrived at UVU. I thought Terryl Farnsworth was supposed to be the Audio/Visual guy🤔 photo taken by @icharleswilson

@RealCandaceO @LauraLoomer @StateDept @USTreasury Несомненно

@LauraLoomer @StateDept @USTreasury Uh-oh @LauraLoomer… 😱 Подкаст-авиакомпания снова отличилась! Cc: Baron Coleman

Candace Owens is 100% in communication with sanctioned individuals. As I reported recently, Dugin said he wants Russia to sell nuclear weapons to Iran to destroy the United States. The State Department @StateDept , DOJ and @USTreasury really need to investigate @RealCandaceO. @DAGToddBlanche

@BlakeBednarz Who are the two people Brian Harpole stands near at 2:40… black t-shirt w/ red hat and blue/white stripped dress w/ white hat? In another video he doesn’t flinch when it happens.

Charlie was unknowingly wearing a shaped charge inside his necklace • The guy on the roof was another patsy • The speakers were used in the detonation to play an amplified gun shot • Kozak signaled to Harpole that the trans question was next up • Harpole was wearing the controls to the weapon & Harpole squeezed the remote • Wake up America

@AlienHotep @baroncoleman Just take baby steps, hahah. Good movie!

@baroncoleman Here's a pic of me explaining to @baroncoleman how just taking a week off doesn't work for me at this time.

I'm going to be off this week, but I'll (probably) be back by Friday. If I'm not back by Friday, then Sunday. See you then!

@CrystalHope1979 “Holy Schnikes.” I think someone grew up watching Tommy Boy. Great video!

Every single day, this fluffy white cloud of joy waits patiently… until he hears THAT truck. Then it’s full zoomies, tail wags, and the biggest Samoyed smile for his favorite FedEx hero! 🐶🚚❤️ True love on four paws and one delivery route in New Hampshire. Who else has a pet that loses it when their favorite delivery driver pulls up?

I have CONFIRMED Tyler Robinson WAS in custody at the Washington County Sheriff's Office at 6:50p on September 11, 2025. You may post your apologies below. I'm eager to hear all about how it's normal for people to post confessions to Discord AFTER they are in custody.

@ronsterd89 Skin

@baroncoleman The Real McCoy (1993)

@RealCandaceO I immediately thought of The Real McCoy from ‘93 with Kim Basinger and Val Kilmer.

Very uncomfortable to watch. Painful prompter read. A speech CLEARLY written by someone else. Objectively terrible so they will now pay for people to tell us otherwise. Also, of everything I’ve said about Erika she chooses to respond to something I never said. They always lie.

@CNviolations 80-95% of children experiencing gender dysphoria come to terms with their birth sex and shouldn’t use puberty suppressors. Look up the Tavistock Studies which have shown that the majority that start suppressors go onto the irreversible portion of cross sex hormones. Leave kids be

I'd like to buy that man a drink, the one in the suit.

@iamcoachcolin @Thewebb_io Good call then. It was eerily similar though.

@KellyZbind30173 @Thewebb_io It’s slightly over now. Glad I didn’t run with it

OOOK before I get this sent to me 1000 times, I search the file to see if its actual and found nothing. Either its fake and ai or it was deleted. My guess is ai. We'll have to wait until @Thewebb_io is back up and running to check.

@Princess_Wndy @imelizabethlane EK- “I don't even know where to begin. The fact that we were able to pull off an event of a century, like, it's just insane. We had over 275,000 people that attended and stadium overflow, west gate.” Who says that 6 days after in a zoom call! And bragging about hat sales.

I hope she sues you for defamation. What makes you think you own "grieving "? How is it possible that every single person in the world grieves only how you personally Grieve. What a disgrace: speaking such insults and defaming someone's character based upon something that you know nothing about. Go speak to a grief counsellor - any one- they will all tell you that people Grieve differently and that there's different emotive stages during grief. Instead, you've decided you're an expert and totally abused and defamed a grieving widow for your own personal gain. Clearly, compassion isn't your strong point. Nor is common sense.

I’m going to be blunt. I’ve reached the point where I find Erika Kirk deeply disturbing, not because of rumors or gossip, but because of consistent, observable patterns of behavior. To be clear, everything I say in this post is my opinion, I’m not claiming this is a fact I’m saying this is what I think Erica Kirk is. I come from the world of acting and modeling. I’ve spent years around social climbers, opportunists, image-curators, and people who treat relationships as ladders, that is why I left that world. Most of these people are shallow and harmless. A few are dangerous. Erika falls into the latter category not because she is just ambitious, but because of how calculated and performative her ambition appears to be. I believe she maybe a psychopath. What stands out immediately is the reaction she provokes in people, which is very common with psychopaths. Across the board including from people who support her publicly, the private reaction is the same: “I can’t watch her.” Not criticism, just physical discomfort. People turn off interviews because the presentation feels artificial to the point of being unbearable. let me explain: That kind of response does not happen accidentally, and it does not happen often. Research in psychology shows that humans are highly sensitive to emotional incongruence, mismatches between facial expression, tone, and content. When affect appears simulated rather than genuine, the brain registers it as a threat signal. This activates discomfort and avoidance, even if the person cannot consciously explain why. So many of us felt this way but we could not explain why we could not watch her. Studies on psychopathy, particularly those building on the work of psychologists like Robert Hare, describe traits such as rehearsed emotional display, and shallow affect. These traits can create what observers experience as an “uncanny” interpersonal dynamic. The discomfort arises and people want to shut it off because most people rarely encounter extreme affective mimicry in everyday life, so the brain struggles to categorize what it is detecting. (Comment below if this is what you felt like when watching her.) Erica is attractive enough, and she had every tool in her position to sell this organically except for one thing - emotion. The entire story of what happened could have helped her sell this fully, she really would have been the last person on earth to be a suspect, if not for the FBI’s terrible mistakes, TPUSA’s lies, and her very fake performance. Plenty of attractive, ambitious women move through media spaces without triggering that response, even though we know what they are. This is about something else, an extreme disconnect between presentation she puts out and perceived authenticity. Erica is not the archetype of a model/actress seeking money and fame and then settling into a quiet life with a wealthy good looking husband. She’s the wolf type. Who wants to be in the place of that husband.She is not born for a supporting role, she’s a decision-maker type. She appears to pursue proximity to power, moving fluidly between television, nonprofits, branding opportunities, and ideological spaces that maximize exposure. Her previous partners are guys women like her would date, muscular, jacked, good-looking. Even though they are not people with huge potential, they are all somewhat established. They are good stepping stones until the right person shows up. Now, looking at her previous partners, I’d say Charlie probably was not her type visually, but he was exactly what she was looking for in a man - potential to be a great power. What Erica was looking for is the same thing Hillary Clinton was looking for when she met Bill. She recognized that Bill Clinton was her ticket to power, the power she could control and she was right. She realized she could create a great brand out of him and herself, and they still are a brand. The Clintons. No one in this world can say they love each other. They are a brand that works. This is why she’s sticking around despite Epstein and Lewinsky. Also, if you think Bill is the decision-maker there, you must have never been in close proximity to the Clintons. She moves the game, she is the decision-maker. Erica saw a brand with Charlie. She also saw that Charlie could one day become President of the United States if he wanted to. Charlie had the ear of the most powerful segment of any society - students! He was going to be a very important player in politics, and she was not missing that ride. What’s striking is how completely her public identity reshapes itself after that relationship begins. The aesthetic, the tone, the values, the presentation all change. Overnight, the persona shifts into the role that best fits Charlie’s world, devoted Christian, modest, supportive housewife. That kind of rapid adaptation is quite impressive for a usual person but not for a psychopath, they do it all the time. In my head story goes like this: For a moment, it works. She becomes the wife of a rising political figure with access to donors, institutions, and national platforms. At that point, the ceiling isn’t social media influence, it’s empire-building, foundations, global reach, a legacy brand - Kirks! It’s obvious that Charlie listens to her, whether it’s about donors or the trajectory of TPUSA. The most influential figure in any mentally healthy man’s life is his wife. She is going to be the biggest influence, and that’s just how it is. That is why you need to pick you partner wisely! Everything was going well until Charlie makes decisions based on conscience rather than expansion and money. He turns down money. He refuses to play dirty politics. I’m assuming someone like Erica who married into this because she had a vision for this brand would not be very happy that. The life she appears to have signed up for - power couple, expanding influence, historical relevance, was collapsing into something else entirely, domesticity, housewife kids and now Charlie's refusing to accept the money that can make him a global power. A supporting role instead of center stage is not her thing. Her husband died a few days ago, and she walks onto the stage as if she were born there. It comes naturally to her, she knows it, and she wants it. Just days after her husband’s death, she was already laying out ambitious plans for the company over Zoom. It’s obvious she was always deeply involved in the business and knew exactly where to pick up when her turn came. What people struggle to watch, what makes the screen unbearable, is not grief. It’s the absence of emotional continuity. Performances can be learned, trust me, as a former actress I can speak to that, but emotion can’t be improvised or mimicked if you’ve never experienced it. That’s why I think we are dealing with a psychopath who has never really experienced these emotions and does not know how to play them. And audiences feel it instantly. It’s fake. Again just my opinion. This isn’t an accusation of crime, I’m not claiming this is what happened and it's a fact. It’s an analysis I made after watching her long enough. And quite honestly I am sick of this shit.

@MJB021618Mandy @baroncoleman I’ve met his doppelgänger at a Jaguars/Titans game. Haha

@baroncoleman Weird question were you on an American airline flight on Jan 4th or Jan 7th? I have been debating asking because I didn’t want to seem like a crazy stalker but you may have a doppelgänger 😂

Someone had ENTIRELY too much time on their hands. But this actually made me laugh out loud. youtu.be/o9x0wWcG_tk?si…

“Charlie’s blood was still wet. As the grass was rolled up, his blood got on their forearms.” UVU INSIDER: Charlie Kirk assassination crime scene destruction supervised by FEDS!

@rotoballs @ShadowofEzra That’s the same guy that works for TPUSA and also uses CK’s chair to take out the SD card from the camera minutes later.

@ShadowofEzra What’s this guy doing?

Candace Owens reveals that Kash Patel and the FBI seized all surveillance footage from the hospital where Charlie Kirk was taken. She questions why the FBI would need video from inside the hospital. Owens says agents collected every piece of footage from both inside and outside the building.

@HeinzEisenhart Since this happened I kept thinking about the movie Snake Eyes with all the misdirection— haven’t seen it since I was 14 but thought I’d look it up again. So eerie knowing the names, political motives, and decoys. David Koepp screenwriter and co-wrote with director Brian De Palma

In the 1998 movie Snake Eyes, the character "Secretary of Defense CHARLES KIRKLAND" is shot in the neck in the exact same spot where Charlie Kirk (Charles James Kirk) was. Boxer "Lincoln TYLER" feigns a knockout (takes the fall) to help the assassination plot. The killer is a Palestinian sniper ("Tarik Ben Rabat"), acting on orders from Commander "Kevin Dunne". The motive to kill "KIRKLAND" is to stop him from exposing an arms deal involving ISRAEL. The film's poster features a triangular hand sign, and the tagline reads "Believe everything except your eyes".