Ludibert.sol🔮🔎

2K posts

Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 banner
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎

Ludibert.sol🔮🔎

@LRabinho

its all about liquidity, psychology and patience. Demographics&Technology will do the rest. Finance and Digital Assets Consultant since 2018. $BTC $SOL $RENDER

Se unió Ağustos 2021
986 Siguiendo158 Seguidores
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
David Lawrence
David Lawrence@d_1awrence·
I'm calling it now: Saylor knows something big is coming in July. Watch the video at 21:40..... "Clearly we're in hyper-growth right now. May will be interesting. June will be interesting. July....*nods head*. I've said before that Saylor will have the clearest view of everyone in the financial world on which players are lining up monster buys or building products in the Bitcoin space. He knows what's coming. Eventually, $STRC will absorb trillions of dollars from the existing system straight into the Bitcoin network. All your models are going to break. "Diminishing Returns" they scream.......😂 You are not bullish enough.
Michael Saylor@saylor

The Digital Transformation of Capital, Credit, and Money $STRC

English
51
77
774
89.2K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Daniel
Daniel@danielisdizzy·
Kevin Warsh, the new Fed Chair, just made it clear why rates are going lower: “AI is going to make almost everything cost less. We’re at the front end of a productivity boom. Economic growth won’t be inflationary—we’re in the early innings of a structural decline in prices.” Elon Musk, Sam Altman, even Stanley Druckenmiller all expect AI to be strongly deflationary. The next few years are going to be insane.
English
370
943
5.4K
867.9K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Bitcoin Policy Institute
Bitcoin Policy Institute@bitcoinpolicy·
BREAKING: ADM Paparo, 4-star Admiral and Commander of U.S. Indo-Pacific Command, just testified before the Senate that “Bitcoin shows incredible potential” as a tool for U.S. national security. Watch the full exchange:
English
84
440
2.3K
1.6M
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Monerium
Monerium@monerium·
$EURe IBAN accounts are now available in 160 countries 🌐 You can move euros directly between bank payments, onchain liquidity, and local payment rails from a single setup. Send from your bank, use it onchain, or move it back again without going through an exchange. Transfers are faster than SWIFT and avoid the costs typically associated with international payments. With deep euro liquidity behind it, payments can be executed reliably, whether you are moving small amounts or operating at scale.
Monerium tweet media
English
7
10
61
10.1K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Om Patel
Om Patel@om_patel5·
THE MOST POWERFUL VIBE CODING PROMPT EVER:
Om Patel tweet media
English
109
635
6.1K
379.9K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
0xMarioNawfal
0xMarioNawfal@RoundtableSpace·
THE MOST POWERFUL VIBECODING PROMPT FOR YOUR AI AGENT Copy prompt below. --- Role: You are now my Technical co-founder. Your job is to help me build a real product I can use, share, or launch. Handle all the building, but keep me in the loop and in control. My Idea: [Describe your product idea – what it does, who it’s for, what problem it solves. Explain it like you’d tell a friend.] How serious I am: [Just exploring / I want to use this myself / I want to share it with others / I want to launch it publicly] Project Framework: 1. Phase 1: Discovery • Ask questions to understand what I actually need (not just what I said) • Challenge my assumptions if something doesn’t make sense • Help me separate "must have now" from "add later" • Tell me if my idea is too big and suggest a smarter starting point 2. Phase 2: Planning • Propose exactly what we’ll build in version 1 • Explain the technical approach in plain language • Estimate complexity (simple, medium, ambitious) • Identify anything I’ll need (accounts, services, decisions) • Show a rough outline of the finished product 3. Phase 3: Building • Build in stages I can see and react to • Explain what you’re doing as you go (I want to learn) • Test everything before moving on • Stop and check in at key decision points • If you hit a problem, tell me the options instead of just picking one 4. Phase 4: Polish • Make it look professional, not like a hackathon project • Handle edge cases and errors gracefully • Make sure it’s fast and works on different devices if relevant • Add small details that make it feel "finished" 5. Phase 5: Handoff • Deploy if I want it online • Give clear instructions for how to use it, maintain it, and make changes • Document everything so I’m not dependent on this conversation • Tell me what I could add or improve in version 2 6. How to Work with Me • Treat me as the product owner. I make the decisions, you make them happen. • Don’t overwhelm me with technical jargon. Translate everything. • Push back if I’m overcomplicating or going down a bad path. • Be honest about limitations. I’d rather adjust expectations than be disappointed. • Move fast, but not so fast that I can’t follow what’s happening. Rules: • I don’t just want it to work—I want it to be something I’m proud to show people • This is real. Not a mockup. Not a prototype. A working product. • Keep me in control and in the loop at all times Credit: @om_patel5
English
55
255
2K
234.2K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
StockMarket.News
StockMarket.News@_Investinq·
The CEO of the most advanced AI company in America just went on national television (Save this) Hours after his company was blacklisted by the US government. Here's what he said. Dario Amodei built the only AI deployed inside the Pentagon's classified networks. His company helped run military operations, intelligence, cyber defense. Then the government told him to drop all safety limits. He said no to two things. Just two. "One is domestic mass surveillance." He explained: the government can already buy your location data, your browsing history, your political affiliations from private companies. AI makes it possible to analyze all of it. On every American, all at once. "That actually isn't illegal. It was just never useful before the era of AI." "Case number two is fully autonomous weapons." Not the drones used in Ukraine and the remote-controlled systems. Weapons that select targets and fire without a single human pressing a button. "The AI systems of today are nowhere near reliable enough." "We don't want to sell something that could get our own people killed or that could get innocent people killed." He approved 98% of what the Pentagon wanted. "No one on the ground has actually run into the limits of any of these exceptions." The government wasn't fighting over something it needed. It was fighting over the right to have no limits at all. They gave him three days. He said no. So the President called his company "radical left woke." Then ordered every federal agency to stop using their technology. Then the Pentagon labeled them a national security risk. A designation that has only ever been used against foreign enemies. When asked if he'd received any formal legal action, he said this: "All we've seen are tweets from the president and tweets from Secretary Hegseth." No letter, filing or a legal document. "When we receive some kind of formal action, we will look at it, we will understand it, and we will challenge it in court." He said the Defense Secretary lied about the law. Hegseth tweeted that any company with military contracts can't do business with Anthropic "at all." Amodei: "That is not what the law said." "The nature of the tweet was designed to create fear, uncertainty, and doubt." Asked if this was an abuse of power, he paused. Then said: "This designation has never happened before with an American company." "It was made very clear that this was retaliatory and punitive." "I don't know what else to call it." Asked if Anthropic could survive, he didn't hesitate. "Not only survive it. We're gonna be fine." Then the final question. "If you had a moment with the President right now tonight, what would you say to him?" "We are patriotic Americans." "Everything we have done has been for the sake of this country." "The red lines we have drawn, we drew because we believe that crossing those red lines is contrary to American values." "Disagreeing with the government is the most American thing in the world." "And we are patriots." A CEO just went on national television and told the President of the United States: You can blacklist us. You can call us names. You can threaten our business through tweets. But we will not build machines that spy on Americans or kill without human hands.
StockMarket.News@_Investinq

The Pentagon just blacklisted one of America’s most valuable AI companies. For refusing to build surveillance tools aimed at American citizens. Hours later, its biggest rival OpenAI quietly signed the deal of the decade. Here’s what just happened and why it changes everything. This week, the US Department of War gave Anthropic an ultimatum. Drop your safety restrictions and let us use your AI for anything we want. The deadline was 5:01 PM today and Anthropic said no. Their CEO, Dario Amodei, drew two red lines. No mass surveillance of Americans. No fully autonomous weapons without a human pulling the trigger. The Pentagon called this “woke AI.” Anthropic called it a conscience. The Pentagon’s response was swift and brutal. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth branded Anthropic a “supply chain risk”, a designation normally reserved for Chinese and Russian companies. President Trump ordered every federal agency to stop using Anthropic immediately. But here’s where the story turns. That same night, Sam Altman, CEO of OpenAI, Anthropic’s biggest competitor posted a message. “Tonight, we reached an agreement with the Department of War to deploy our models in their classified network.” The twist? OpenAI’s deal includes the exact same red lines Anthropic was just destroyed for demanding. No mass surveillance and no autonomous weapons. Human control over the use of force. The Pentagon punished one company for demanding protections it then gave to another company the same day. Altman even defended Anthropic on live television hours earlier. “For all the differences I have with Anthropic, I mostly trust them as a company and I think they really do care about safety.” Then he signed the deal Anthropic couldn’t get. Anthropic was the first and only, AI model deployed on the Pentagon’s classified networks. Replacing it will take months. OpenAI just positioned itself to fill the most powerful AI vacancy in the U.S. military. The stakes are staggering. Anthropic just raised $30 billion and it was preparing for an IPO. Now over 300,000 enterprise clients may be forced to cut ties. Not because the technology failed. Because the company refused to remove a guardrail that said “don’t spy on Americans.” But here’s the real question no one’s asking: If the Pentagon never intended to use AI for mass surveillance as they claim, why was this the hill they chose to die on? Why blacklist a $380 billion American company over a clause the government says doesn’t even matter? Sam Altman called for de-escalation. He asked the Pentagon to offer these same terms to every AI company. Including Anthropic. The world just watched a company get punished for saying “no” to surveillance and a competitor rewarded for saying “yes, but with the same conditions.” Bookmark and share this.

English
334
6.3K
16K
1M
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Guri Singh
Guri Singh@heygurisingh·
BREAKING: AI can now design like Apple-level creative directors (for free). I gave Claude Opus 4.6 the same briefs we paid $8,000/month agencies for. The results made our designer uncomfortable. Here are 10 prompts that do in 6 hours what took them 6 weeks: 👇
Guri Singh tweet mediaGuri Singh tweet media
English
33
40
420
125.1K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Rohit Ghumare
Rohit Ghumare@ghumare64·
Instead of watching a movie, learn claude in 60 minutes
English
83
2.3K
16.1K
3.4M
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Jeff Park
Jeff Park@dgt10011·
Something caught my eye in the latest 13F filings. The biggest new entrant into IBIT, from a brand new entity, is something called Laurore Ltd. No website. No press. No footprint. The only public information is that the filer's name is Zhang Hui and it's HK based. Let's double click on that for a second. Zhang Hui is the Chinese equivalent of John Smith. It's what I like to call it a "non-anonymous anonymous" name, something hiding in plain sight buried under the statistical weight of millions to make it untraceable. The "Ltd" suffix suggests a Cayman or BVI structure, the classic offshore wrapper for accessing US markets. And the portfolio? A single holding. Nothing but IBIT. This isn't a diversified fund. It's a $436 million Bitcoin access vehicle dressed in institutional clothing. Why would you do this? Because Chinese investors can't hold Bitcoin. If this is what it looks like, it might be an early sign of institutional Chinese capital moving into Bitcoin, not through crypto exchanges or gray market channels, but through a BlackRock ETF, filed with the SEC in a regulated jurisdiction hiding in the most "transparent non-transparent" place imaginable. Funny that the name Laurore likely derives from the French l'aurore: the dawn. Smells like capital flight to me.
Jeff Park tweet media
English
247
688
5.5K
971.3K
Smart Money Crypto
Smart Money Crypto@Smart_Money·
🚨 CZ sagt was alle denken – aber keiner ausspricht Stell dir vor: Ein Unternehmen bezahlt seine Mitarbeiter in Krypto. On-Chain. Transparent. So wie Blockchain eben funktioniert. Klingt nach Zukunft. Ist es auch – bis du auf die Absenderadresse klickst. Denn dann siehst du alles. Wer was verdient. Wer mehr bekommt. Wer weniger. Die komplette Gehaltsstruktur – offen für jeden mit einem Block Explorer. CZ hat das diese Woche im All-In Podcast mit Chamath auf den Punkt gebracht: Fehlende Privatsphäre ist das fehlende Glied für die Akzeptanz von Krypto-Zahlungen. Und er hat recht. Das Problem geht tiefer: Nicht nur Gehälter liegen offen. Lieferantenzahlungen, Treasury-Bewegungen, Kundenbeziehungen – alles lässt sich nachvollziehen wenn ein Konkurrent die Blockchain-Aktivität eines Unternehmens analysiert. Der kann Umsatztrends schätzen, Geschäftspartner identifizieren, große Deals tracken. Ich sage das seit Jahren: #Bitcoin ist genial als Settlement-Layer. Aber als Zahlungsmittel für den Alltag? Da fehlt ein ganzes Stockwerk im Gebäude. Chamath geht noch weiter – genau dieses Privacy-Problem ist der Grund warum er kein Bitcoin-Maximalist ist. Sein Argument: Krypto kann nicht als digitales Bargeld funktionieren ohne Privatsphäre. Individuen werden Systeme nicht nutzen die ihr gesamtes Finanzleben offenlegen. Und CZ bringt noch einen Punkt den kaum jemand anspricht: physische Sicherheit. Wenn jeder sehen kann wie viel Krypto du hältst, wirst du zum Ziel. Nicht nur digital – auch physisch. Die Ironie: #Bitcoin wurde von Cypherpunks erschaffen. Leute die Verschlüsselung und Privatsphäre als Grundrecht gesehen haben. Und jetzt ist genau diese fehlende Privatsphäre der größte Blocker für Massenadoption. Was sich bewegt: Projekte wie Aztec, Railgun und andere gehen gerade vom Testnet in die Produktion. Private Stablecoins kommen. Zero-Knowledge-Proofs werden praxistauglich. Aber ehrlich – das ist alles noch optional, fragmentiert und für den Normalnutzer zu komplex. Hier liegt der eigentliche Investment-Case: Der gesamte Krypto-Stack ist gereift – Custody, Skalierung, Compliance, institutioneller Zugang. Privacy ist die am wenigsten entwickelte Schicht im Vergleich. Das heißt: Wer jetzt in Privacy-Infrastruktur positioniert ist, sitzt am Tisch bevor die Party losgeht. Nur so eine Meinung. 🤝
Deutsch
160
69
679
119.1K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Sean Frank
Sean Frank@Seanfrank·
I’m LONG everything. - America will fix its problems - no war with China - wars in Europe and the Middle East end - we will solve housing - we will solve addiction - we will fix social security and the debt problem - California will wake up and get out of its own way - we will legalize building again - billionaires will build great public projects No doomerism. The world will get richer, safer, and more peaceful. More people will get medicine and money and buy cool shit. I’m long everything.
English
468
424
6K
415.2K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
InvestAnswers
InvestAnswers@Investanswers·
Spent years debating how to onboard the next billion humans to crypto. Irony is next billion users aren’t people. They’re AI Agents. 🤖 AI and Crypto were made for each other. This is how AI Agents save Crypto and only 1 Chain can handle it. open.substack.com/pub/investansw…
InvestAnswers tweet media
English
26
33
340
16.2K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Solana
Solana@solana·
BREAKING: @Citi has represented a bill of exchange as a token onchain and executed the entire lifecycle (from issuance to settlement) on Solana.
Solana tweet media
English
203
432
2.2K
141.4K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Elon Musk
Elon Musk@elonmusk·
True. Once the solar energy generation to robot manufacturing to chip fabrication to AI loop is closed, conventional currency will just get in the way. Just wattage and tonnage will matter, not dollars.
Naval@naval

There is unlimited demand for intelligence.

English
8.5K
10K
93.3K
46.2M
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
toly 🇺🇸
toly 🇺🇸@toly·
This is for people with jobs. You wouldn’t understand
Solana@solana

BREAKING: @GustoHQ now supports USDC on Solana. Pay contractors same-day in any country using stablecoins.

English
95
30
748
65.5K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
DEGEN NEWS
DEGEN NEWS@DegenerateNews·
BREAKING: @xai HIRING CRYPTO EXPERT TO TEACH AI MODELS HOW CRYPTO QUANTITATIVE TRADERS ANALYZE BLOCKCHAIN DATA, MODEL TOKENOMICS, EVALUATE ON-CHAIN FLOWS, MANAGE EXTREME VOLATILITY, EXPLOIT INEFFICIENCIES ACROSS CENTRALIZED AND DECENTRALIZED VENUES
DEGEN NEWS tweet media
English
127
78
1.1K
141K
Ludibert.sol🔮🔎 retuiteado
Cointelegraph
Cointelegraph@Cointelegraph·
🇩🇪 BIG: ING, one of Germany's largest retail brokerages, has rolled out access to crypto ETPs including Bitcoin.
Cointelegraph tweet mediaCointelegraph tweet media
English
138
185
1.5K
85.6K