Meekee011

@LTheos11169 @yyzqommi @Tarikh_Eran Just apologizing for lying and defending murder of children

@yyzqommi @Tarikh_Eran Iran Press TV is funded by the Iranian government therefore it is bullshit. We can use your exact same logic. Anyway IranWire debunked this Minab bullshit and there is nothing you can do about it.

Do people still buy the Minab school story? First they told us all the kids died Now they tell us there are survivors First they told us it was a US tomahawk Now they tell us it was actually drones First they told us it was an all girls school Now they tell us it was mixed gender First they told us they had a video of the tomahawk Now its just a bunch of he said she said and “trust me bro” First they told us the school was nowhere near a military compound Now they say it was actually just on the corner of an IRGC base The regime’s narrative is self contradictory and all over the place. Nothing adds up.

@Totorokkk9 @badiucao @adrianzenz @CUyghurs Yes I know dummy ... it's a center where minorities get free education, learning languages and other skills along with job programs... There's been many videos from these centers as everyone can go in and out lol 😆 😂

@Meekeepeeper @badiucao @adrianzenz @CUyghurs Okay fine, people only believe what they want to believe and you said it is an open center, which is probably the most funny thing I’ve heard about. DO YOU KNOW WHAT vocational training is in China lol.

80% of Labubu dolls contain Xinjiang cotton, as confirmed by independent testing commissioned by the New York Times. Toymaker Pop Mart had publicly defended use of Xinjiang cotton in a 2023 court filing. This was first discovered by @CUyghurs. Link below:

@oxpal @James78883286 @primeargument @RezaNasri1 I would bet you anything there's no mention of any of them in your tweets hypocrite... U westerners are worst kind of evil and stupid...a hypocrites.. I also never said 6th century China is same as modern China.. Another lie.. It just comes to u effortlessly

@Meekeepeeper @James78883286 @primeargument @RezaNasri1 You brought up the 6th century - your tweet is still there, so no need to call me a liar just because you finally realized your absurdity. I am consistent - you just have no clue what I think about Okinawa or Catalonia.

China has an enormous advantage over the United States when it comes to serving as a strategic partner, a reliable trade partner, or an effective mediator in international disputes. In terms of political system, unlike the United States, where individuals with questionable mental stability, character, or moral clarity can ascend to the highest offices through electoral spectacle, China’s leaders are rigorously selected, highly sophisticated, battle-tested, and consistently reliable. They emerge from a meritocratic process that prizes competence, long-term vision, and institutional discipline rather than short-term populism or personal charisma. This systemic stability extends to China’s foreign commitments. Whereas a single U.S. administration can casually repudiate treaties, alliances, or multilateral agreements signed by its predecessor—something the world witnessed dramatically with the election of Donald Trump and the abrupt scuttling of major accords—China’s undertakings survive electoral cycles and leadership transitions. This state continuity is not provisional but structural, giving Beijing a decisive edge in predictability and trustworthiness that Washington has largely forfeited. China’s broader vision of global affairs is markedly more balanced, pacifist, and respectful of other nations’ legitimate interests. While the United States has long profited from sowing and sustaining conflict—particularly in the Middle East, which it transformed into a perpetual powder keg through aggressive arms sales, the proliferation of military bases, and repeated regime-change operations—China has actively worked to reduce tensions. Its successful mediation between Iran and Saudi Arabia stands as a concrete example of constructive diplomacy aimed at reconciliation rather than division. Beyond these strengths, Chinese officials consistently observe diplomatic norms both in rhetoric and in action. They avoid the crude threats and ultimatums that have become routine in U.S. statecraft, such as explicit warnings to “kill” or otherwise eliminate foreign diplomats who fail to deliver Washington’s desired negotiating outcomes. China steadfastly upholds the principle of national sovereignty and refrains from interfering in the domestic affairs of other countries, treating internal political choices as matters for sovereign peoples alone. In sharp contrast, the United States openly regards "regime change" as a legitimate policy tool and routinely interferes through sanctions, covert operations, or outright military pressure. Furthermore, China’s foreign policy remains grounded in objective facts and pragmatic analysis rather than ideological labels or manufactured narratives. It does not weaponize terms such as “terrorism” to justify unlawful aggression against rival states, nor does it allow its strategic decisions to be hijacked by powerful foreign lobbies (most notably AIPAC and similar interest groups) that shape U.S. policy through selective storytelling and political funding. Beijing’s approach is rooted in evidence, mutual benefit, and long-term stability, not in the dangerous American doctrine of “peace through strength,” which in practice translates into illegal aggression, economic coercion, and the subjugation of other states by force. In every respect—reliability, respect for sovereignty, adherence to international law, and a genuine commitment to the prohibition on the use of force—China demonstrates a principled consistency that positions it as the superior partner for nations seeking genuine cooperation rather than subordination.

@JonesGashner @realdannysafa @unusual_whales I guess ure not able .. How suprising 🤣😂

@Meekeepeeper @realdannysafa @unusual_whales What lies have been said third worlder?

“The overall percentage of Americans viewing China as an enemy dropped from 42% in 2024 to 28% now," per Axios.

@lycanthropvnk @PKohotozajima @stimson_ben1975 As his profile says...these are the values worth fighting for 😂

@PKohotozajima @Meekeepeeper @stimson_ben1975 that's not a Nazi eagle but just a heraldic bird, pancek.

Even the London times has given up any censorship of the Na3i symbols.

@UmulisaAnisha @racoon_strong The idiot is even typing in Chinese 😂🤣

@racoon_strong @Meekeepeeper Delusional

Unpopular opinion; Taiwan had always belonged to China until it was annexed by Japan. Eighty percent of the Taiwanese population is of Han Chinese descent.

@lycanthropvnk @PKohotozajima @stimson_ben1975 Hes trying a desperate spin lol

@PKohotozajima @Meekeepeeper @stimson_ben1975 according to Hitler, you're just Slavs.

@racoon_strong @UmulisaAnisha Oh no !!!!! Western media faking data for Chinese benefit ?? 😂🤣 That's the first one... Wanna provide Evidence for your claims champ ?

@Meekeepeeper @UmulisaAnisha It's fake data, you retard.

@KotnameW @naomirwolf No problem then 🙏

@Meekeepeeper @naomirwolf You misunderstood that. 🤷‍♂️

I appreciate this. It’s literally the first time I’ve heard a European say ‘thank you’ to the US for the service of our troops.

@KotnameW @naomirwolf Lol

@Meekeepeeper @naomirwolf Im certainly not parroting any narrative. 😂

@racoon_strong @UmulisaAnisha Lol

@UmulisaAnisha Fake. Just shut up.

@ted_huang @UmulisaAnisha Silly western cucks

@UmulisaAnisha Before Qing dynasty annexed Taiwan in 1684, the Dutch and the Spanish Empire established colonies in Taiwan. Then Qing "ceded" Taiwan to Japan "in perpetuity" under the terms of the Treaty of Shimonoseki in 1895. Qing China only ruled Taiwan for 211 years

@jtht222 @UmulisaAnisha Jennifer , give up..ure not westerner

@UmulisaAnisha During the Japanese era, non Japanese population is 95% aboriginal. How do you get the 80% Han is beyond me. Care to share the methodology of survey behind the 80% numbers? Demography is science not opinion, by the way.

@montagsgericht @ted_huang @UmulisaAnisha Hes wanna be westerner named...Ted ! 😂

@ted_huang @UmulisaAnisha So what's your ethnicity?

@crehage Wonder why

Why do Ukrainians and all other normal people hate *the Islamic Republic* so much?

@jaanus x.com/i/status/20508…

russia has been genociding its neighbors for several centuries

@qirimlia Ure right

For us the war did not start in 2022 or even in 2014, its roots go much deeper and span generations

@ofkaradag @VladDadTrump @qirimlia We even have photos of it

@VladDadTrump @qirimlia Coup? Do you even know what a coup is?

@Y_Wenli I know ow better than you, cuck

@Meekeepeeper 我这样羞辱你的伟大领袖你难道不生气吗？还是只是只对咱们墙内文化一窍不通的死鬼佬？

I’ll never get over how nakedly racist anglo tankies can be towards anti-establishment diasporic Chinese progressives. This is far from the worst I’ve seen.

@Y_Wenli Lol someone recognized themselves in my comment 😂🤣

说曹操曹操到，thx for proving my point Also, do you think the “anti-establishment” here merely means “anti-Beijing”? Use your fcking brain