RhinoX

👍👍👍👍👍

@WRanald @GlobalIJournal @me_aware_awake An US with nuclear weapons is also very destabilising. And btw, Trump said last year that he had destroyed Iranian nuclear production facility, hadn't heard? And CIA and Pentagon had said Iran could not produce nuclear bombs. Don't make excuses, US just wants oil.

@GlobalIJournal @me_aware_awake To be fair, an Iran with nuclear weapons is very destabilizing. As the second most powerful nation in the world it is time for China to start acting as a responsible influence on that world.

🇺🇸 🇨🇳 Trump: “I think that China has neither the courage nor the will to open the Strait of Hormuz.” ➖️ China: “The Strait of Hormuz was already open before the war. You are the ones who created the war out of nothing and closed the strait to the rest of the world.”

@TheGalox_ I am not sure about US spying you, but I am quite sure China has no interest in spying you or attempting to get your sensitive data.

If buying a $25K Chinese EV with 350 miles of range and 100% charging in 5 minutes means China tracking me then sign me up I prefer China spies me in my cheap yet great EV than the US spying me in my plastic filled $60K Ford that breaks down every 200 miles

@primeargument @RezaNasri1 Do some homework and learn some basic Chinese history. Xinjiang, Tibet, Mongolia, Taiwan all belong to China since centuries ago. I understand you're sinophobic but for God sake, stop messing with history.

@RezaNasri1 China may be whatever else but it is not pacifist. It's an aggressive expansionist power which has attacked and occupied territory of its neighboring states. Gobbled up Tibet, Sinkiang, Inner Mongolia.

China has an enormous advantage over the United States when it comes to serving as a strategic partner, a reliable trade partner, or an effective mediator in international disputes. In terms of political system, unlike the United States, where individuals with questionable mental stability, character, or moral clarity can ascend to the highest offices through electoral spectacle, China’s leaders are rigorously selected, highly sophisticated, battle-tested, and consistently reliable. They emerge from a meritocratic process that prizes competence, long-term vision, and institutional discipline rather than short-term populism or personal charisma. This systemic stability extends to China’s foreign commitments. Whereas a single U.S. administration can casually repudiate treaties, alliances, or multilateral agreements signed by its predecessor—something the world witnessed dramatically with the election of Donald Trump and the abrupt scuttling of major accords—China’s undertakings survive electoral cycles and leadership transitions. This state continuity is not provisional but structural, giving Beijing a decisive edge in predictability and trustworthiness that Washington has largely forfeited. China’s broader vision of global affairs is markedly more balanced, pacifist, and respectful of other nations’ legitimate interests. While the United States has long profited from sowing and sustaining conflict—particularly in the Middle East, which it transformed into a perpetual powder keg through aggressive arms sales, the proliferation of military bases, and repeated regime-change operations—China has actively worked to reduce tensions. Its successful mediation between Iran and Saudi Arabia stands as a concrete example of constructive diplomacy aimed at reconciliation rather than division. Beyond these strengths, Chinese officials consistently observe diplomatic norms both in rhetoric and in action. They avoid the crude threats and ultimatums that have become routine in U.S. statecraft, such as explicit warnings to “kill” or otherwise eliminate foreign diplomats who fail to deliver Washington’s desired negotiating outcomes. China steadfastly upholds the principle of national sovereignty and refrains from interfering in the domestic affairs of other countries, treating internal political choices as matters for sovereign peoples alone. In sharp contrast, the United States openly regards "regime change" as a legitimate policy tool and routinely interferes through sanctions, covert operations, or outright military pressure. Furthermore, China’s foreign policy remains grounded in objective facts and pragmatic analysis rather than ideological labels or manufactured narratives. It does not weaponize terms such as “terrorism” to justify unlawful aggression against rival states, nor does it allow its strategic decisions to be hijacked by powerful foreign lobbies (most notably AIPAC and similar interest groups) that shape U.S. policy through selective storytelling and political funding. Beijing’s approach is rooted in evidence, mutual benefit, and long-term stability, not in the dangerous American doctrine of “peace through strength,” which in practice translates into illegal aggression, economic coercion, and the subjugation of other states by force. In every respect—reliability, respect for sovereignty, adherence to international law, and a genuine commitment to the prohibition on the use of force—China demonstrates a principled consistency that positions it as the superior partner for nations seeking genuine cooperation rather than subordination.

@Ripamaru @RnaudBertrand How dumb and stupid of you to think of that. Unbelievable.

@RnaudBertrand That's fine. I'm not saying buy nothing from them. But you have to use caution in dealing with them because they use their companies for political and corporate espionage.

Hilariously, when you actually read this FT article 👇 one of the main "national security problems for Europe" that could be "posed by Chinese green technology" is, quote: "that the US could demand Europe remove Chinese technology from its energy systems — or face tariffs, sanctions or reduced security commitments." In other words, a risk that has literally nothing to do with China but everything to do with the US's chokehold on European sovereignty.

@SenatorSlotkin x.com/i/status/20487…

Chinese cars have video, 3D mapping, and geolocation capabilities – and all of that data is sent back to Beijing. It's like a driving surveillance package. That is a risk to both our economic and national security.

@SenatorSlotkin I worry much less about Beijing having my data than US fascist govies giving it to Palantir to target me for extermination. x.com/FinancialPhys/…

@MindMenderX Jessica Alba

Top 10 Hottest Actresses 1. Jamie Lee Kurtis 2. Elena Satine 3.Catherine Zeta-Jones 4. Alison Brie 5. Kelly Preston 6. Margaret Qualley 7. Charlize Theron 8. Alexandra Daddario 9. Jessica Biel 10. Margot Robbie Anyone you’d add or remove? 👀

@World_Affairs11 Pls do. Don't brag.

BREAKING: The US says it will impose 100% tariffs on China if it buys Iranian oil.

@jenzhuscott I think their ultimate target "destination" is not desk top but humanoid robot companies for "integration".

But why

@miren_41319 年紀大，自然縮水。况且 180 也不算矮了。那位總統也太高了吧。但王毅氣場抵得住大個子。

身高为185cm的中国王毅 身高为208cm莫桑比克总统丹尼尔·查波 这……

@CarlZha Well, NYT is just "not WSJ" in US.

Poor Geely, got called "Not BYD" by NYT. L(Mao)

@Demeter_Erinia I am 65. I go to bed at 1230 and wake up at 0730 & pee.

Serious question. Why do people 50+ wake up like at 5 a.m.?

@LeadEscapeGoat @ShangguanJiewen If most Chinese can't afford to leave their home province, why would the gov't hv built the 50,000 km of HSR across the country? Pls use your brain.

@ShangguanJiewen Most Chinese people can’t afford to leave their home province. Reality doesn’t exist for people who shill for the US or China exclusively. Objectivity is lost on both.

Did you know, that as a percentage of our populations, three times as many US citizens permanently move abroad to live in other countries, as do Chinese citizens. Why do you think US legacy media doesn't tell you that? 👇

@sestewart44 @ShaykhSulaiman Why not?

@ShaykhSulaiman Please don't say Israel did it! I can't handle you fuckers just saying stupid shit

WHY WAS COLE ALLEN SEARCHED IN ISRAEL 12 HOUR BEFORE ATTEMPTED ASSASSINATION?

@ZhaiXiang5 @EricLDaugh But she lies a lot and very often behaves like a bxtch. I think the Chinese one, Mao Ming, is much better.

@EricLDaugh Though I don’t always agree with her, she’s brilliant! One of the best US press secs I have ever observed

🚨 NOW: Press Sec KAROLINE LEAVITT just showed up to the WH Correspondents Dinner LFG! She handles them like a pro! 🔥

@cgtwts At the end the American models want to reap off everyone via tokens or GPUs; whereas the Chinese ones want to empower everyone via accessibility to AI.

> be chinese ai labs > while claude and openai are in cold war > kimi dropped k2.6 using deepseek's v3 architecture > the same week deepseek drops v4 using kimi's muon optimizer > 1.6 trillion parameters & 1M context > both match or beat closed models on benchmarks while being 8x cheaper > both build on each other's breakthroughs > keep shipping frontier LLMs with far less or nerfed NVIDA GPUs > and keep them 100% open sourced the real battle is not between models, it's open source vs closed.

@RubiconTrading @0xSero Please behave like an educated adult. DS can be run local. Your comments on China blah blah show clearly you are an idiot and behave just like a dumb and childish American.

Except; It. Is. A. Chinese. Model. Everyone forgets these feed back to their government. People like you who can 100% monitor / prevent that on your local machine are in the extreme minority. Everyone else will fuck up their “isolation” and start leaking their personal info -> hacking -> infiltration -> SCREWED

DeepSeek-v4 is the most important AI release of 2026 It's going to fundamentally change the economics of big labs, corporations, and governments I have seen a lot of disappointment, or brushing this off because Qwen3.6-27B was so amazing. I have self-hosting + using it 24h 🧵

@billd1085676 @D162Michele

@D162Michele I mean, i've had Chinese AI Models self identify as "Claude" and as "Chatgpt" and even "Gemini". Its kind of an obvious thing.

When you can’t beat China, just accuse them of cheating. Standard American playbook.

@BowesChay He may try and let's see the consequences.

‘We can choke off China's oil at any time we want’: US lawmaker Carlos Gimenez says China’s energy and food dependence could be targeted in a conflict Playing a dangerous game.

@cbsguy63 @TigiSmartVibes @_InfoGram_ Murderous regime? You are referring to the US and Israel, aren't you?

@TigiSmartVibes @_InfoGram_ Yeah , let’s just reward a murderous regime …hope they bring plenty of security

BREAKING🚨: This is Massive from Italy.🔥 🇮🇹 Italy under Meloni REJECTS proposal from Trump’s envoy to replace Iran with Italy at the World Cup Italy called this idea as 'VERY SHAMEFUL' 🇮🇹 ITALY under MELONI politely saying "Get lost TRUMP"