Neil Murcko

859 posts

Neil Murcko

Neil Murcko

@NeilMurcko

Pasadena, CA Se unió Kasım 2021
45 Siguiendo11 Seguidores
Neil Murcko retuiteado
BonkDaCarnivore
BonkDaCarnivore@BonkDaCarnivore·
Reporter: Attacking civilian infrastructure violates the Geneva Convention (interrupted) Trump: The New York Times is failing Reporter: "OK whatever. Aren't these war crimes?" Trump: "You're fake news. You said I wouldn't win the election and I won. I won the election. I'm a winner." He's everything we were worried Biden had become, except worse
English
28
80
397
27.7K
Neil Murcko retuiteado
Marci Shore
Marci Shore@marci_shore·
I've taught European history for 30 years. Americans have always asked me how the Holocaust was possible, how Germans could have enabled a madman reveling in mass murder to carry out his plans. Now we can see in real time how this is enabled; now we have front-row seats.
Marci Shore tweet media
English
2.3K
24.2K
72.5K
1.2M
Marlene Nikolaevna
Marlene Nikolaevna@nikolaevnaru·
@NeilMurcko @piersmorgan For you its all war crime? Its crime @Keir_Starmer "killing" the british people with mass imigration, does that mean nothing to you? You are been replace, this is a genocide! Care about your people and leave Trump destroy terrorist!
English
1
0
0
25
Piers Morgan
Piers Morgan@piersmorgan·
Which part of ‘A whole civilisation will die tonight.. ’ am I misrepresenting?
Scotty@TheMeanAverage

@piersmorgan Why do you do this? You know you're deliberately misrepresenting his statement, and yet here we are. Do you make a lot of money off of engagement farming?

English
1.9K
2.9K
51.3K
2.5M
Neil Murcko
Neil Murcko@NeilMurcko·
Looking forward to those astronauts sending back the final shot of Oppenheimer
English
0
0
0
10
Neil Murcko
Neil Murcko@NeilMurcko·
@nikolaevnaru @piersmorgan How are civilian deaths minimized by bombing civilian infrastructure? That’s a way to maximize them. War crime.
English
1
0
0
13
Marlene Nikolaevna
Marlene Nikolaevna@nikolaevnaru·
@NeilMurcko @piersmorgan In War is not possible you dont kill innocents, no matter how cautious one is, and he speaks of ending the extremists, not of the Iranian people.
English
1
0
0
24
Marlene Nikolaevna
Marlene Nikolaevna@nikolaevnaru·
@piersmorgan You know perfectly well that he's (TRUMP) talking about the Ayatollahs, but since you're a bipolar and filthy pig traitor to the English people, you say this crap just to impress.
English
1
0
0
944
Just a random guy.
Just a random guy.@RajabiNima·
@piersmorgan Trump is too much aggressive in his rhetoric, he is not stupid to wipe out a civilization, something big is going to happen, maybe the largest coupe d'etat in human history,
English
1
0
0
3.9K
Neil Murcko retuiteado
LT Jonathan Kendrick
LT Jonathan Kendrick@enjoyer_liberty·
“your dick is small” “oh yeah? well yours is big!”
LT Jonathan Kendrick tweet media
English
203
791
27.3K
665K
Skeletor
Skeletor@skeletorischad·
@NeilMurcko @hasanthehun Let's see how things play out tomorrow. Like u said I care mostly about innocent people not being fucked over.
English
1
0
0
31
Neil Murcko
Neil Murcko@NeilMurcko·
@skeletorischad @hasanthehun They “would” or they do? I just want a source on them wanting to be sent back to the Stone Age. Also Trump’s stated goal isn’t regime change, it’s to “open the fuckin strait.”
English
1
0
0
24
Skeletor
Skeletor@skeletorischad·
@NeilMurcko @hasanthehun They would understand its for the greater good to speed up the process of a regime change. Your so short sided it's funny. You have America derangement syndrome you side with anything that's not America. You probably sided with Venezuela
English
1
0
0
32
Skeletor
Skeletor@skeletorischad·
@NeilMurcko @hasanthehun They would both be clearly the bad guys then. The Iranian people want the usa to intervene but you libtards ignore that.
English
1
0
0
26
Skeletor
Skeletor@skeletorischad·
@NeilMurcko @hasanthehun Let's see how things unfold. If they do devastate iran tomorrow they better aid the civilians with all the things they need
English
1
0
0
28
Neil Murcko
Neil Murcko@NeilMurcko·
@dmd1998slb @hasanthehun The reporter asked him how it wouldn’t be a war crime to destroy bridges and power plants. Normally it would be a war crime because it’s deadly to civilians, so the regime being animals wouldn’t answer the question. It would have to be that the civilians are animals.
English
0
0
9
92
D8
D8@dmd1998slb·
I didn’t say that, but you go right for theTDS talking point. Never did he call the woman and children animals…. The regime are the animals, these are horrible people and America is acting as world leaders to fix that issue. Collateral is part of war which sucks, but we will help rebuild Iran for the Iranians not the regime.
English
1
0
1
112
Neil Murcko retuiteado
FactPost
FactPost@factpostnews·
The Trump administration is shutting down 74% of all Forest Service research facilities. These facilities study wildfires, droughts, and environmental changes.
FactPost tweet mediaFactPost tweet media
English
194
2K
4.5K
421.3K
Neil Murcko
Neil Murcko@NeilMurcko·
@dmd1998slb @hasanthehun Why don’t you think the lives of women and children will be affected by bridges and power plants being destroyed?
English
1
0
7
118
Neil Murcko
Neil Murcko@NeilMurcko·
@skeletorischad @hasanthehun So true! I’m so retarded for thinking the loss of electric water and fuel pumps, food refrigeration, AC, etc would cause a significant death toll lol
English
1
0
0
11
Skeletor
Skeletor@skeletorischad·
@NeilMurcko @hasanthehun The ones on life support for sure. The others idk but it won't be anywhere near the amount caused by there radical government
English
1
0
0
26
Tommy
Tommy@PJharveyBIRDMAN·
@NeilMurcko @hasanthehun Wrong…. “…they killed 45,000 people, protesters…” If you can’t comprehend who “they” is…then I’m not sure I’m the retarded one here, Neil
English
1
0
0
25