RugNik

@kirillk_web3 Claude Fable 5' doesn't exist. Neither does a Mythos-class model from Anthropic. The engagement bait is real though you're literally watching it work right now.

You’re burning $12,400 every month on a useless team. One founder replaced almost all of them with Claude + n8n for $187. Content, emails, support, reports — all automated 24/7. The TikTok shows how ridiculously smooth it runs. My thread has every prompt and setup. Agencies will keep scamming you for $15k You can launch this shit this week for pennies. Stop feeding dead weight.

Let’s be real: does anybody actually use Claude like this? 😂

ANTHROPIC SHIPPED A FEATURE THAT MOST BUILDERS AND CONTENT CREATORS STILL HAVEN'T TOUCHED. Skills. Not prompts. Ready-to-use files you give Claude that speed up your workflow and raise output quality instantly. Folder to Claude. Done. Setup takes 10 minutes. The gap between people getting generic output and people getting consistently sharp, on-brand, correctly formatted output is usually just this one thing they haven't installed yet.

THREE COUNTRIES THREE DIFFERENT WAYS TO TAKE YOUR PRIVACY ONE TELEGRAM FOUNDER SAYING WE ARE ALREADY LATE. EU - chat control, automatic scanning of all private messages, not suspected people everyone. UK - digital IDs, internet only for those who proved who they are. australia - online age checks anonymity in the network is gone. durov looks at this list and says one word: dystopian. and adds that time to save the free internet is. running out not "maybe someday" now, while these laws are not yet passed, while these systems are not yet fully built. germany blocked chat control. but that is not a victory it is a delay, experts say the fight has only just started. privacy is under attack, free speech is under attack. and most people do not know about it.

While senior devs are still arguing about architecture and best practices for months… A 17-year-old schoolkid built a full No Man’s Sky-style procedural planet in one weekend and already made 5000$ He just opened Claude, typed prompts, and got live terrain generation, biomes, atmosphere, LOD, spaceship controls and an entire solar system. No plugins. No assets. No team. No years of experience. Experienced programmers still charge $8k–$20k and deliver in 3–6 months. The kid recorded a 30-second clip, threw the files on Gumroad for $15 and is laughing all the way to the bank. Read the thread. Build it this weekend.Or keep perfecting your codebase for another year 😂

@S1TA10 People aren't buying the files. They're buying confidence that it's possible

@RugNik 15 bucks for the files is a smart move

A 17 year old schoolkid just made $5,000. He built a full No Man’s Sky-style procedural planet in Unity using Claude Code in one weekend. Fly to the planet, watch terrain generate live, land on unique surface, add biomes, atmosphere, LOD, spaceship controls and even a whole solar system. No plugins. No assets. No team. Just Unity + Claude Code and exact prompts from the thread. Studios still charge $5k–$15k for this exact thing. He recorded a 30-second flythrough, dropped the project files on Gumroad for $15, and cashed out. Now you can do the same this weekend. Read the full breakdown. Build one planet. Post the clip.A kid just proved it works. What’s stopping you?

@Vax0r The real disruption isn't AI getting smarter. It's AI becoming personal.

He replaced his ChatGPT subscription with a mini PC the size of a book. Best $800 he's spent this year. New AMD AI mini-PC. Small enough to fit in a backpack. Powerful enough to run real language models locally. No cloud. No monthly bill. No company reading your prompts. Everything happens on the device sitting on his desk. People think ChatGPT is just a chatbot in a browser tab. It's not. It's a full reasoning engine — and now it fits in something smaller than a shoebox. This is the shift nobody's paying attention to yet. Personal AI computers are becoming a normal thing to own. Not a server room. Not a subscription. Just a box on your desk.

@Vax0r The people winning with AI aren't waiting to become experts first.

He used to think programming took years to learn. Then he ran an AI model locally on his own machine. That belief lasted about a week. Local models don't just answer questions in a chat box. They write full chunks of working code, catch bugs before they break anything, and speed up the entire build process — all running on his own hardware, no cloud round trip slowing things down. He's not a computer science grad. Never finished a coding bootcamp. Just someone who opened a local AI model and started building. The barrier to entry didn't get lower. It basically disappeared. People are shipping real software right now who couldn't write a single function a year ago.

@solanadegepxxe And in a year, today's weekend project will be a 10 minute project.

@RugNik A year ago this would've been a startup. Now it's a weekend project 🔥

@Vax0r Everyone sees the AI. I see a 17-year-old moving faster than most adults.

@RugNik This breakdown is gold. Exact prompts + clear steps make it actually doable. A 17-year-old building a full procedural planet in one weekend is wild. Saved the thread.Would go for something weirder first. Thanks for sharing every step!

@0x404page The scary part isn't that she's fake. It's that the audience doesn't care.

被一个帖子震住了，一个21岁的美国大学生，靠AI虚拟女友一个月赚了4.3万美金。 他在OnlyFans上做了一个叫Maya的账号。这个Maya，22岁，标签是UCF心理学辍学生，有1247个付费订阅者，单个粉丝最高刷了1847美元。但最关键的是，照片里那个女孩压根不存在。 没有真人出镜，没有真人打字。所有的消息是AI写的，照片是AI生成的，声音也是AI合成的。整个Maya，就是藏在他MacBook里的四个文档。 以前搞一个AI虚拟网红，动辄半年到一年半，现在他只用4周就跑通了。再往后，可能一个周末就能搭出来。 这四个文件是这样的： · persona.md，写清楚Maya的人设、背景、喜好； · voice.md，固定她说话的语气和声音风格； · flux.md，固定长相、拍照风格，保证所有照片看起来是同一个人； · brain.md，记下每个订阅者聊过什么，什么喜好。 AI每次回复粉丝之前，都会把这四个文件读一遍，所以从来不崩人设，也不会忘记粉丝说过的话。 说实话，技术栈简单到有点离谱了。以前那个很有名的虚拟网红Aitana López，团队花了18个月才做出来。现在Maya这种模式，4周就全搞定了。 这根本不是科幻，就是任何一个有台电脑的人都能照着做的东西。而且不止是OnlyFans，这套流程往Instagram、TikTok、Twitch上套，都一样跑得通。 AI把造一个虚拟人的成本几乎干到了零。到这一步，剩下唯一的门槛，其实就是你有没有那个品味，去决定这个虚拟人应该是个什么样子。

Agencies charge $3k–$8k to build dead Obsidian second brains. This guy made a living neural net with STDP learning that fires real neurons and gets smarter every cycle — dropped for free. Agents watch your screen, feed data into the brain, pull insights and loop nonstop. The brain literally evolves in real time. Most builders still sell static folders that do nothing. One tool. Real thinking brain + autonomous agents. Full memory and self-improvement in minutes. Now you can undercut agencies, deliver tomorrow and keep all the margin.

@kirillk_web3 The model isn't the bottleneck, the routing logic is. Most people don't overpay because they don't know about cheaper models — they overpay because building a reliable router that knows when to downgrade is more work than just paying Opus tax

the clock is ticking. every day you wait is another day someone else is running both models and paying 77% less than you. people are routing Kimi K2.7 for mechanical work and Opus 4.8 only when it matters. meanwhile you're still sending everything through Opus and wondering why your bill is $500/month. while you're scrolling content you'll forget by tomorrow — someone just read the A-Z guide and cut their API bill from $340 to $87. same 24 hours. completely different outcome. your call. guide is below.

@cyrilXBT Close but worth the nuance — GLM-5.2 ties Opus on FrontierSWE/MCP-Atlas, but Opus still leads by a wide margin on the truly long-horizon stuff (SWE-Marathon, Tool-Decathlon). The hardest benchmarks are actually where the gap is biggest, not smallest.

GLM 5.2 JUST LANDED WITHIN 1% OF OPUS 4.8 ON THE HARDEST AGENTIC CODING BENCHMARKS. At roughly a sixth of the price. $1.40 per million input tokens, $4.40 per million output, versus Opus 4.8's $5 and $25. This is the moment open-weight models officially caught up to frontier closed models on the metric that actually matters: long-horizon agentic coding, not a synthetic leaderboard. Cheapest near-frontier model on the market right now.

@RoundtableSpace Jarvis didn't have ideas. Tony did. Jarvis just made sure none of them died in a notebook.

A REAL JARVIS SYSTEM THAT BUILDS PROJECTS FROM IDEAS It splits thinking and execution. Obsidian stores unfinished ideas. A separate machine runs Claude to turn approved ideas into real working projects using a structured file system.

Agencies charge $3,000–$8,000 for a custom browser mini-game. One guy built three full horror games in a single evening with Claude Fable 5 — for under $20.No studio. No developers. No 3D artists. Just prompts. All HTML. Fully playable in any browser.Lethal Company-style spaceship with monsters and loot. Phasmophobia-style ghost hunting with real tools and scares. FNAF-style animatronics and jump scares.All shipped the same night.Horror is the perfect genre right now — atmosphere, lore and tension are easy to describe in words. Claude executes perfectly.Solo builder undercuts every agency at $800–$2,500 and delivers in days, not weeks.The agencies will keep charging $8k. You can charge $1k and close tomorrow.

An asian guy has discovered a method to learn anything ten times faster using AI! It just involves the Claude + Obsidian. Most people learn the slow way: read, forget, re-read, forget again. His flip: use Claude to turn anything you're learning into small, connected notes. Use Obsidian to link them so nothing you learn ever sits alone. The slow way: highlight a book, move on, forget it in a week. The fast way: Claude breaks it into atomic notes, and Obsidian links them into a growing web of knowledge. Six months in, one new idea instantly connects to twenty things you already know. I broke down every Claude resource you should try to master claude in 7 days with practical guide that most people have never found. Article below ↓